XTR
F-TR obssessed shooting junkie
The 6.5Creed, the 6.5x47 Lapua and the 260 Rem are ballistic triplets. The 260 has been around longer, the two 6.5s came along at about the same time. All are good rounds if they fit in the ballistic envelope you need/want. The advantage that the 6.5s have over the 260 is that they are slightly shorter cases and can seat long bullets at a better seating depth when mag fed, and have a better shoulder angle than the 308 besed 260.
The 6.5 Creed got hyped, and developed a fanboi following.
What's amusing is that it was the flavor of the month for a while in PRS before they all moved to 6mms.
One personal example of the hype surrounding the chambering. I was at a long range F class match in MS and was between relays putting my rifle on the bench behind the line. A bystander walked up and commented on my rifle, and asked what it was. (I shoot F-TR) When I told him it was a 308 he asked "why aren't you shooting a Creedmoor?" as if that was the round for 1000 yards. Why didn't he ask why I wasn't shooting any of a dozen other rounds that might have better ballistics than a 308 at 1000 yards?... hype.
The 6.5 Creed got hyped, and developed a fanboi following.
Therefore, all of the old crusty, curmudgeonous, contrarians hate it. It is as simple as that. It is pushback against an image...regardless of performance.
What's amusing is that it was the flavor of the month for a while in PRS before they all moved to 6mms.
One personal example of the hype surrounding the chambering. I was at a long range F class match in MS and was between relays putting my rifle on the bench behind the line. A bystander walked up and commented on my rifle, and asked what it was. (I shoot F-TR) When I told him it was a 308 he asked "why aren't you shooting a Creedmoor?" as if that was the round for 1000 yards. Why didn't he ask why I wasn't shooting any of a dozen other rounds that might have better ballistics than a 308 at 1000 yards?... hype.
Last edited: