wkdickinson
Gold $$ Contributor
Sightron SIII 45X45 ED - best value out there for 50 and 100 yd. RFBR.
Nobody ever learned anything more than what was on the table by not trying something new. You can always go back if it doesn't work out. If you never go forward and experiment/test, you constrict yourself to what you think is the best, but could possibly be not.Should be a straightforward installation, but, if I hesitate, it is because I have an aversion to mess with something that is working well. Never mess with a going machine! But, what the heck, I don't have much else to do this week.
Will report how it goes (went?)
Luisyamaha
I dont think you can ever have too much optical horsepower.My CZ-455 has presently a Leupold 6-18X40mm scope. I've had a Minox 6-30X 56mm around for a few years (bought it on impulse, never mounted on anything) which I'm thinking of putting on the CZ. Mostly I shoot it on the 50 yard range, although occasionally I shoot it at 100.
Any thoughts? Too much X? Too big, heavy, or tall? On the pro side I'll be able to see the bullet holes better...
What say you?
Luisyamaha
It's nice to have but it comes at the price of not seeing the far flags due to reduced field of view. That's all I've been saying on this subject. If you feel like you can see the flags well enough, good. Those subtle changes can eat your lunch though. I'm not talking about seeing flags switch from green to orange, but the small angle changes that are very hard to detect at much distance with the naked eye. Hell, I wish I could fit them all in the scope! Ever wonder how those 6x guys shoot so well?I dont think you can ever have too much optical horsepower.
Field of view is where the "variable" of a variable power scope comes in. I do mainly critters at different distances. I don't shoot in matches. And paper only for testing and zeroing. More horsepower is always better. Nice to see things big on the screen.It's nice to have but it comes at the price of not seeing the far flags due to reduced field of view. That's all I've been saying on this subject. If you feel like you can see the flags well enough, good. Those subtle changes can eat your lunch though. I'm not talking about seeing flags switch from green to orange, but the small angle changes that are very hard to detect at much distance with the naked eye. Hell, I wish I could fit them all in the scope! Ever wonder how those 6x guys shoot so well?
I have never used either of the two riflescopes you mention...nor familiar with them but based on the greater range spread of magnification offered, I'd mount the 6-30x-56. Just starting in rimfire F-Class, I simply transferred over my F-O center fire NF 15-55 riflescope. And I normally use a range of 20-40x, just like in center fire.My CZ-455 has presently a Leupold 6-18X40mm scope. I've had a Minox 6-30X 56mm around for a few years (bought it on impulse, never mounted on anything) which I'm thinking of putting on the CZ. Mostly I shoot it on the 50 yard range, although occasionally I shoot it at 100.
Any thoughts? Too much X? Too big, heavy, or tall? On the pro side I'll be able to see the bullet holes better...
What say you?
Luisyamaha
I can't disagree with that a bit.Field of view is where the "variable" of a variable power scope comes in. I do mainly critters at different distances. I don't shoot in matches. And paper only for testing and zeroing. More horsepower is always better. Nice to see things big on the screen.
I use the Sightron 45xED on 2 RFBR riles, and have a Weaver 36x FCH on a CZ MTR. A couple of spare weavers in the closet.
FactNobody ever learned anything more than what was on the table by not trying something new. You can always go back if it doesn't work out. If you never go forward and experiment/test, you constrict yourself to what you think is the best, but could possibly be not.
Scott
8-32 1/8 min Japanese Tasco on the 457; fixed 10x Lyman target spot on the 52; 3-9 Leupold on the Shilen 10/22; 4-12 vortex on the Shaw 10/22. If I were you, I’d stick with that fine Leupold. Better glass. Had a 6.5-20 Leupold on the 40x but I put that bad daddy on my Savage 12 in 204. Man, I likes that 204. Damn thing is 6 times the speed of sound.My CZ-455 has presently a Leupold 6-18X40mm scope. I've had a Minox 6-30X 56mm around for a few years (bought it on impulse, never mounted on anything) which I'm thinking of putting on the CZ. Mostly I shoot it on the 50 yard range, although occasionally I shoot it at 100.
Any thoughts? Too much X? Too big, heavy, or tall? On the pro side I'll be able to see the bullet holes better...
What say you?
Luisyamaha
That's what I love about the internet gun forums, I always learn something factual.Had a 6.5-20 Leupold on the 40x but I put that bad daddy on my Savage 12 in 204. Man, I likes that 204. Damn thing is 6 times the speed of sound.