I would think only the first group would show, how do you keep track of the rest?
When I fire 15 consecutive shots as required in Palma matches and they're all like this I can't find much reason for driving back and forth!

I would think only the first group would show, how do you keep track of the rest?
43-43.5Ok, here's my attempt using the OPs method. Would like some feedback. Trying to find the magic in my .308 using 185 Juggernauts and Varget. Charge weight notes on top and group distance from vertical on bottom. No chrono data. Light at the range today was throwing off some strange numbers
![]()
If I understand this method correctly, the two contiguous groups with closest distance to vertical is the node. Would that be #4 and #5 or #5 and #6?
Or maybe #3 and #4?
I'm thinking two areas- 22.4-23 with 22.7 the middle. And 23.9-24.5. 24.5 was a bit hot with some primer cratering. So about 23-9-24.3. Any comments?And started to workup a .223 load with Berger 82 gn, and Varget, seating depth -.020 at 1.890
Seating test done today with Varget 22.7, 100m 8-10 quartering downwind. Do you pick the lowest SD or the best group? Do you need a good group on either side? Comments please.I'm thinking two areas- 22.4-23 with 22.7 the middle. And 23.9-24.5. 24.5 was a bit hot with some primer cratering. So about 23-9-24.3. Any comments?
1.899-1.902, and tiny powder changes. Forget about sd/es. Let them come to you if they willIn addition, can I assume, that if the same loading techniques are performed, that the SD's will remain similar across the seating depths to what was seen during this test?
Thanks Seymour! I'll give it a go.1.899-1.902, and tiny powder changes. Forget about sd/es. Let them come to you if they will
1.899-1.902, and tiny powder changes. Forget about sd/es. Let them come to you if they will
Great shooting Rick. One day I would like to try my pea shooter (6mm Dasher) at 1000 yards....if you would allow a novice 1000 yd shooter to use your range. Good shooting...James MockWhen I fire 15 consecutive shots as required in Palma matches and they're all like this I can't find much reason for driving back and forth!
15shot by Sharps Man, on Flickr
Great shooting Rick. One day I would like to try my pea shooter (6mm Dasher) at 1000 yards....if you would allow a novice 1000 yd shooter to use your range. Good shooting...James Mock
Good shooting. Looks like a good combination.I went with 0.016" off of jam and it seems to have come together pretty good. Shot these groups today
.308 185g juggernauts
Lapua brass
43.5g Varget
Fed. 210 primers
![]()
I usually use 3 shot groups just to get an initial point to work but have learned not to trust them too much. 5 is better, and at least 10 to confirm a load and re-shoot any pulled shots. Here is a .308 series of targets. I only changed the jump between each group and fired 1 shot each in group 1 through 6 and then started over again. This was with Lapua brass, 41.7 grains of IMR4064, Federal match primers, and Hornady 168g BTHP Match bullets. 30 rounds all together at 100 yards off a rest. The 4064 powder shoots better on a good day but seems sensitive to temperature so I usually just use Varget now.6.5 x 47 L using BR4 primers and 130 Norma golden targets -.002, Varget 36.2 - 38.0 in .2's
Curious for opinions. I'm thinking 36.9 test seating depth, or shoot in .1's from 36.7-37.1, 37.6 has potential but seems to be a narrower node between scatter nodes.
View attachment 1010457
[QUOTE="Erik Cortina, post: 36639205, member: 1217825
Broadside, get away from neck sizing and F/L size your brass everytime with .002" shoulder bump. Brass will chamber and extract easier and it will be more consistent since brass will always be the same size it enters the chamber.
[QUOTE="Erik Cortina, post: 36639205, member: 1217825
Broadside, get away from neck sizing and F/L size your brass everytime with .002" shoulder bump. Brass will chamber and extract easier and it will be more consistent since brass will always be the same size it enters the chamber.
Greetings from New Zealand. I only found this site a month or so ago and that was via this post. Since then I've learnt much and now sadly realise how little I know about precision reloading. I've searched many sites, forums, you tube, etc to get a better understanding of this hobby yet I still don't fully understand the art of precision case prep. I wish someone would start a step by step thread on the subject...... Just saying....
I've seen Erik mention before that full length resizing is a must and I was one of the many, I guess, who was under the belief that neck sizing was the way to go. I'm not fortunate enough to have a custom rifle or custom dies so my concern is that FL resizing will work the brass too much and/or bump the shoulder back more than 0.002" if the case is run into the die far enough to resize it completey. And from what I've seen it will also reduce the overall case size too much.
I know this thread is all about load development but since FL resizing is strongly recommended by Erik I'd like to get to grips with this so my load development actually works. The last two 223 loads I did for different rifles didn't clearly show any nodes and both had a large extreme spreads. I'm putting this down to poor case prep cause by my ignorance.
So, does FL resizing mean just that or is it resizing the full case slightly with custom dies?