I have zero dog in this fight, as I don't use tuners, but if they work, they work. I have been around long enough to know that if a BR or other discipline guy has one on his rifle, it ain't just there for show. That's what Lapua stickers are for.....
That being said, my questions are: Why is he doing this? What can he gain? Why did he not utilize a better testing regimen? Isn't science about being open-minded? Does this lead to questions/concerns about his bullet designs and/or ballistics theory? Did those also receive the same "strict" testing regimen?
It does sound like he wanted it to fail, for whatever reason. If I was designing/selling bullets, I would want anything available to make them perform better.
Just curious, I know that it sure does leave a bad taste....
That being said, my questions are: Why is he doing this? What can he gain? Why did he not utilize a better testing regimen? Isn't science about being open-minded? Does this lead to questions/concerns about his bullet designs and/or ballistics theory? Did those also receive the same "strict" testing regimen?
It does sound like he wanted it to fail, for whatever reason. If I was designing/selling bullets, I would want anything available to make them perform better.
Just curious, I know that it sure does leave a bad taste....