@tom are most testing different neck thickenss also to see what the chamber likes? Assume this is like testing all other aspects of a load
Thanks for the reply
Pansy.I haven't taken things that far. Years back I set one up for .002 total clearance and struggled with that set up. Went back to +-.003 and haven't seen a reason to change. There's damn good shooters running no turn chambers as well, but I haven't had the balls to try it yet lol.
Tom
Tom, I see you tested Alpha 1 and Alpha 4, how many variations are you testing all together? Looks like a monumental effort!
4 as of now until we see a direction.Tom, I see you tested Alpha 1 and Alpha 4, how many variations are you testing all together? Looks like a monumental effort!
Glad to see you are doing this.
CW
Which target was alpha 4 or was it the red color on both targets?Round one of the "tournament" started today.
View attachment 1230728View attachment 1230729View attachment 1230730
Best tunes for each, and an example of a group ripped off from some extras in group fashion rather than the round robin fashion for the tests. Conditions were squirrely, but spread out evenly throughout the two tests.
Tom
Red vs purple. Same test 30 minutes apart.Which target was alpha 4 or was it the red color on both targets?
Appreciate the updates.Red vs purple. Same test 30 minutes apart.
Tom
Appreciate the updates.
Here's a question likely without an answer yet but I'll ask it anyway. As I understand it you are testing flash hole size so are you essentially tuning the flash hole to your platform, componenents, bullets, powder, primers, chamber, barrel etc. or in other words just because a particular flash hole size is going to favor your platform and components that doesn't mean it will favor everyone else's correct?
Different lots or brands of powder and or primers could possibly favor a different size flash hole and there would be know way to know for sure without testing in your own platform..
I've got nothing but respect for your work here and recognize the effort you have into and thank you for sharing it but I'm curious if you think your findings are going to be the rule without exception for everyone else's platform and components or to take advantage of your findings that flash hole size does show a preference a guy is going to need multiple sets of various size flash hole brass to test it out in his own platform?
Late to the dance. Which group corresponds to which flash hole size?What I know so far.....as of today anyway.
I'm no longer afraid of .080" orifices.
Firing the first time, and then uniforming with my old Hart adjustable cutter was not a problem. However they do have a sort of "go-stop-go" feeling while priming.
They will shoot competitive groups, as they're currently made and sold.
What I don't know....as of today anyway.
Pretty much anything else lol.
Tom
I have followed Toms and Alex’s posts for quite some time. The crew in Montana are not stupid, they do post unbiased truthful information which will help. I shoot in a completely different environment but there information has been extremely beneficial in my shooting experience. I have been shooting completely at 1000 yds for more than 30 years. Successful people open their eyes to new ideas and thinking. Nothing remains stagnant. Someday I would like to have the opportunity to meet them and shoot at their range.You have to remember this pertains to mostly what Tom is shooting.
He is just posting what is working with his barrel, his action, his temps
and altitude, his primers, bullets, powder, neck tension, etc. To find out if this would work
for everyone else, he would need to change barrels, primers and place he shoots.
I'm pretty sure he doesn't have that time and resources to do all that.
Take this info for what it is, a test in his conditions and components for him
to shoot smaller.