• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

How NOT to validate your chambering job

Regarding the grizzly rod...

Hang a small weight on the rod... and most of that "slop" goes away. Dial with a grizzly rod like that... then direct indicate in the same spots... I bet it's within a tenth.
 
Regarding the grizzly rod...

Hang a small weight on the rod... and most of that "slop" goes away. Dial with a grizzly rod like that... then direct indicate in the same spots... I bet it's within a tenth.
When i have to use one i have a piece of unistrut on my shelf above that swings out and i hook a string and weak spring to that to hold the grizzly rod up. I heard about the weight thing and used that until i realized it was reading the bottom while i indicated the top. I used a 2oz bell sinker and fishing line tied in a loop i slid on there.
 
When i have to use one i have a piece of unistrut on my shelf above that swings out and i hook a string and weak spring to that to hold the grizzly rod up. I heard about the weight thing and used that until i realized it was reading the bottom while i indicated the top. I used a 2oz bell sinker and fishing line tied in a loop i slid on there.
Hell, I go the wrong way with my adjustments half the time anyway. Maybe that would help!!
 
I doesn't really matter how the Grizzly Rod is loaded. There is still tolerance between the rod and bushing and between the busing and bore. Not to mention the rod's natural resistance to being deflected.

With a high quality direct reading indicator there are no such tolerance issues. Maybe a little flexing when an ultra long stylus is used, but that is easily seen and mitigated.

That doesn't mean the Grizzly Rod wont work well enough, especially with a floating reamer holder, but any attempt to say it's on par with a good direct reading indicator is simply a rationalization. I know because that is what I used to tell myself until I figured out how to use the Interapid.
 
That reminds me... I ordered the interapid months ago from long island indicator and never got it. :/
 
Are you getting the indicator with the tip or getting “just the tip”?

I had ordered the indicator and the 5.5 inch "tip" from them... but if they're not gonna fulfill orders I can get the indicator a dozen other places... but its worthless to me without the tip... which I can't find anywhere else.
 
but any attempt to say it's on par with a good direct reading indicator is simply a rationalization.
I disagree in the context of using a 5.5" stem. As I stated previously- I know we're not "measuring"- but the half thou becomes a full thou. I'm not convinced a couple of tenths would even be discernible on the dial- or the movement itself being sensitive enough- to move the needle with a tenth of movement.

There's no clearance between bushing and rod, and bushing and bore when it's weighted, and the parts are "pressed" lightly together- the clearances are removed.

Explain to me how "a little flexing"- manifests at the dial? It doesn't...

No reason to speculate which one of us is correct- I'll call Long Island Indicator next week and ask 'em.
 
I disagree in the context of using a 5.5" stem. As I stated previously- I know we're not "measuring"- but the half thou becomes a full thou. I'm not convinced a couple of tenths would even be discernible on the dial- or the movement itself being sensitive enough- to move the needle with a tenth of movement.

There's no clearance between bushing and rod, and bushing and bore when it's weighted, and the parts are "pressed" lightly together- the clearances are removed.

Explain to me how "a little flexing"- manifests at the dial? It doesn't...

No reason to speculate which one of us is correct- I'll call Long Island Indicator next week and ask 'em.

I guess I disagree with you a lot.

Two tenths absolutely are discernible with a 5.5" stylus, as those of us who use them know.

It is incorrect that there is no clearance with a weighted Grizzly rod. If there was no clearance the bushing couldn't turn when the chuck is rotated

The long tip potentially flexing or hanging up is hard to describe if you haven't used one.

I am not speculating about anything. I am describing what I have actually seen. You do what you want and be happy........ :)
 
I had ordered the indicator and the 5.5 inch "tip" from them... but if they're not gonna fulfill orders I can get the indicator a dozen other places... but its worthless to me without the tip... which I can't find anywhere else.

I got the tip from Long Island Indicator in about a week. I've never seen it anywhere else. I think some people made one.

5.5" Indicator tip
 
I guess I disagree with you a lot.

Two tenths absolutely are discernible with a 5.5" stylus, as those of us who use them know.

It is incorrect that there is no clearance with a weighted Grizzly rod. If there was no clearance the bushing couldn't turn when the chuck is rotated

The long tip potentially flexing or hanging up is hard to describe if you haven't used one.

I am not speculating about anything. I am describing what I have actually seen. You do what you want and be happy........ :)

There was a discussion several years ago on Practical Machinist about the grizzly rods and not even using the tip of the indicator but further up the stem to try and alleviate some of the inaccuracy.

https://www.practicalmachinist.com/forum/threads/grizzly-vs-clibre-specific-indicator-rods.248343/
 
It is incorrect that there is no clearance with a weighted Grizzly rod. If there was no clearance the bushing couldn't turn when the chuck is rotated
Two parts making contact = no clearance. Following your logic, there would then also be clearance between the stylus and the barrel. There is no difference between the two.
 
Food for thought. Might keep some awake at night. ;);)
I'm chambering some barrels today. I use the Interapid 312B-15. With accuracy of the digital read out on the Haas I decided to see if I could come anywhere close to the same accuracy with the indicator. Without moving the barrel and comparing the indicator VS the readout of the Haas the best I could repeat moving the cross slide was +/- .0001". Now double the stem length and you've double that error.
 
Food for thought. Might keep some awake at night. ;);)
I'm chambering some barrels today. I use the Interapid 312B-15. With accuracy of the digital read out on the Haas I decided to see if I could come anywhere close to the same accuracy with the indicator. Without moving the barrel and comparing the indicator VS the readout of the Haas the best I could repeat moving the cross slide was +/- .0001". Now double the stem length and you've double that error.

Yep. That is what I expect and I am happy with .0002" when I have to use the 5.5" stem.

The Grizzly rod undoubtably has more error, even with it weighted. It likely takes what, .0002" clearance for the bushing to turn around the rod? .003"? Not to mention the rod flexing.

More importantly, every time I checked my Grizzly Rod dial in with the Interapid, I found the Grizzly Rod wasn't showing all the movement.

But guys need to do it the way they want. We get away with a lot in this game..........
 
Last edited:
@tobnpr 's point is, the clearance in the grizzly rod (rod to bushing, bushing to lands) isn't a the problem. Your indicator has a LOT of clearance to the bore.. but it's touching and giving you a reading.

I don't disagree that a good indicator is better than a grizzly if you can use one.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,312
Messages
2,193,354
Members
78,832
Latest member
baconbag
Back
Top