Some years back I tested 8208 for temperature sensitivity two different times from 6Dasher's. Both times it resulted to be the least sensitive of all the powders I tested that included H4895 and Varget. As to AR Comp, while I have not tested it myself, I put strong credit in my sources who have !.!.!I remember when Hodgens said 8208 was the least temp. sensitive, now it isn't. Maybe you had better test for yourself ....... jim
8208 I have tested for temperature sensitivity two different times from 6Dasher's. Both times it resulted to be the least sensitive of all the powders I tested that included H4895 and Varget. As to AR Comp, while I have not tested it myself, I do put strong credit in my sources who have !.!.!
So if one is looking for another powder to use in a .223 trainer for banging steel out to 700-800 yards this would be a good powder to try?
In my 6Dasher's, RL-16 is a little slower burning (not by much), and the least temperature sensitive powder I've ever used.If Alliant would do another one that's r15 speed that would be money. And I bet the military would be all over that.
In my 6Dasher's, RL-16 is a little slower burning (not by much), and the least temperature sensitive powder I've ever used.
In one of my barrels it is the most accurate hands down, with strong results in 2 other barrels that I have used it in.
A couple grains more then a 6BRA (dependent on Free-bore).Does the Dasher hold more powder than the 6bra?
Youd figure they would make some of this temp insensitive powder in the 133 speed for the short range crowd that im sure buys more powder than other disciplines
Do to case capacity, I doubt that to be true, over other disciplines.Youd figure they would make some of this temp insensitive powder in the 133 speed for the short range crowd that im sure buys more powder than other disciplines
If Alliant would do another one that's r15 speed that would be money. And I bet the military would be all over that.
Truth be told, I had developed AR-Comp(TM) with Bofors for the US Army, for use in the M118LR back in 2009. We had been getting some static about Reloder(R) 15 temp response, but the Army personnel we were briefing were not particularly interested in changing from Reloder 15, so we introduced it to the canister market.
Below is some temp response data in a hot 5.56 load. In this test, with this lot of IMR 8208XBR it went up a little at hot. This Hodgdon powder is generally pretty temp stable in my experience though. As others have said, AR-Comp is pretty darn temp stable in all the loads I have tested it in. We use a boatload of it here at Federal, and we changed it to our primary propellant in both the 168gr and 175gr Gold Medal Match 308 Win loads.
Please give it a try. I believe you will like it.
Shoot well,
Paul
View attachment 1124732
Do to case capacity, I doubt that to be true, over other disciplines.
Take F-Class for instance; more shooters nation wide and larger case capacity cartridges being used.
But do agree, hardly ever anything new for fast burning powders in the 133 burn rate.
Truth be told, I had developed AR-Comp(TM) with Bofors for the US Army, for use in the M118LR back in 2009. We had been getting some static about Reloder(R) 15 temp response, but the Army personnel we were briefing were not particularly interested in changing from Reloder 15, so we introduced it to the canister market.
Below is some temp response data in a hot 5.56 load. In this test, with this lot of IMR 8208XBR it went up a little at hot. This Hodgdon powder is generally pretty temp stable in my experience though. As others have said, AR-Comp is pretty darn temp stable in all the loads I have tested it in. We use a boatload of it here at Federal, and we changed it to our primary propellant in both the 168gr and 175gr Gold Medal Match 308 Win loads.
Please give it a try. I believe you will like it.
Shoot well,
Paul
View attachment 1124732
With a burn rate right near IMR 8208 and H4895 and supposedly the LEAST temperature sensitive powder on the market, no one on this board will touch the stuff.
I just keep wondering why.
So according to that graph, ar comp has pretty much the same velocity at -25 as it does at +160? Thats pretty wild.