If they could not steal they would never winThe "slower" delivery and reduced window time is a setup for the 2022 election. The HR1 bill that would allow Washington to control state elections, you know the one's where governors changed election laws without legislation. Some of the state's democrat governors allowed state constitutional law to be broken. HR1 is the means to fund and legalize the stealing of elections. It is happening again, Iowa elected a republican to the house, a close recount,court certified win. Nancy wants the house committee(6 dems-3repubs) to pick the winner. Disenfranchising 800,000 Iowa voters. This is how property,free speech,gun ownership rights will be lost, stolen elections.
Let's hear your plan for new delivery service.USPS is incapable of dong their job. Kill the USPS . Start new.
Waging war?Yup... can anyone name a service that the Federal government does better than the private sector?
Investigate why Amazon can make their delivery projections at a very high success rate- even during China-virus while the USPS success rate continues to drop off the cliff. 160 years ago the Pony Express delivery time was faster. I have relatives who work for and some retired from USPS, so I have a clue of what is going on. Let us not forget much of the USPS is union and they sympathize with the wrong political party if you want efficiency and accountability.Let's hear your plan for new delivery service.
Look up Privatization.. I'm too busy to explain everything.Let's hear your plan for new delivery service.
I wonder how firearms related items will be 're-classified' ?I saw a news clip on TV the other day stating that upcoming "changes" to the USPS would mean slower delivery and shorter hours the PO's would be open. Sounds like a good way to deal with increase in volume everyone says they have..
A receipt from the PO states"
"USPS is experiencing unprecedented volume increases and limited employee availability due to the impacts of COVID-19. We appreciate your patience."![]()
In a story published on 18 March 2021 CNBC wrote (emphasis added):Wal-Mart is the biggest employer in the U.S. and workers depend on government programs to survive, while the family owners (5 people) have more money than 40% of the population.
No , I'm saying many of the workers depend on Food stamps and Medicare, many positions are only part time. Many other employers do the same thing, using the government programs instead of providing any benefits. Many also will not 'lay off' or terminate a less productive worker, instead they just cut the workers number of hours. Wal-Mart is the largest importer and retailer of Chinese products. Wage earners are the ones that drive the economy, The GDP is about 80% retail sales. Bill Gates may eat 'higher on the hog', but he doesn't eat more than us. The country's well being depends on everyone being able to contribute to the economy and tax base. If they don't earn it, they can't invest or save it. The U.S. has a higher rate of poverty than other developed counties, I don't think we have more lazy people. I can remember when retail clerks made a 'family wage'. I bought my clothes from the same man (not the store owner) for over 30 years.In a story published on 18 March 2021 CNBC wrote (emphasis added):
"Walmart announced Thursday it will give 425,000 employees a raise, a move that will increase its average pay to above $15 an hour.
The discounter is the country’s largest private employer with a U.S. workforce of 1.5 million people. Its minimum starting wage will remain $11 an hour. Starting March 13, the company said it will pay store workers who stock shelves or support its e-commerce business $13 to $19 an hour, depending on their role and store location."
Bear in mind the federal minimum wage is $7.25. Even assuming (incorrectly) that every person working on the floor of a Walmart makes only $11 per hour , are you saying they all depend on government programs to survive, whereas if they made $15 they'd be walking in tall cotton?
-
Do you suppose forcing Walmart, Amazon et al to pay a "family wage" will eliminate or even just decrease poverty in the US?No , I'm saying many of the workers depend on Food stamps and Medicare, many positions are only part time. Many other employers do the same thing, using the government programs instead of providing any benefits. Many also will not 'lay off' or terminate a less productive worker, instead they just cut the workers number of hours. Wal-Mart is the largest importer and retailer of Chinese products. Wage earners are the ones that drive the economy, The GDP is about 80% retail sales. Bill Gates may eat 'higher on the hog', but he doesn't eat more than us. The country's well being depends on everyone being able to contribute to the economy and tax base. If they don't earn it, they can't invest or save it. The U.S. has a higher rate of poverty than other developed counties, I don't think we have more lazy people. I can remember when retail clerks made a 'family wage'. I bought my clothes from the same man (not the store owner) for over 30 years.
Like unions.Many also will not 'lay off' or terminate a less productive worker
You don't think stimulus money is being used for investing or savings? Why did seasoned citizens get stimulus money when pensions and SS checks kept coming? Those who have observed the way gov't works know the fed is going to ask for it back in spades and soon.If they don't earn it, they can't invest or save it.
I KNOW we have more lazy people, especially the under 40 crowd. I see it every day. The China virus has worsened the problem exponentially. Why do you think the guaranteed income policy talk has so much support. I don't believe that generation and younger will be able to handle the hardships we are about to face.I don't think we have more lazy people.
I was thinking of the time before the Covid -19 virus. I listen to the economist that study how things work and have statistics to back them up. How do you "know" that we have more lazy people? I would like to see the numbers. I live in a 'college town' the young people I meet are far from lazy, they are goal oriented and motivated to succeed. I've hired many young people to help on the ranch, inexperienced yes, lazy, no way. I worked 40 years in the heavy construction industry, didn't encounter that many lazy people, and they didn't last. Some may be thought to be lazy when they just aren't proficient, or don't have the aptitude or knowledge of the work.Like unions.
You don't think stimulus money is being used for investing or savings? Why did seasoned citizens get stimulus money when pensions and SS checks kept coming? Those who have observed the way gov't works know the fed is going to ask for it back in spades and soon.
I KNOW we have more lazy people, especially the under 40 crowd. I see it every day. The China virus has worsened the problem exponentially. Why do you think the guaranteed income policy talk has so much support. I don't believe that generation and younger will be able to handle the hardships we are about to face.