The most accurate cartridge.

[GSPV]

Catch a flipping clue! The OP is a troll. He gets a perverse thrill out of starting something outrageous and sitting back and feeling superior while other people knaw on the bait.

The time honored method for dealing with trolls is to not react to their provocation, thus denying them the thrill they are after.

OK, I've had my say. Going away now.

 

[bozo699]

so i had to go back and read a little...which you obviously did not....[
and while i dissagree..he did say this on the 2 or 3 page..
"With that said of the .222 I'd have to agree on the 6ppc for 300 yds and beyond"
so i think you have missed something....
dont pick on me go look what i said...

quote author=bozo699 link=topic=3806434.msg36206578#msg36206578 date=1365210158]

i'll admit , i did not read 10 pages of discussion.
as in most things, one must first DEFINE before searching.
1 shot hitting the dot from a cold clean bbl..no sighters.
3 shot
5 shot
10 shot
20shot.....
what distance ??
a 222 rem will not likely beat a 308 win at 600 yds
and a 308 will not likely beat a 300 win mag at 1000yds..and then there is the dasher....

if single target 5 shot at 100 ..the winner is 222rem..as no one has beat that record.
if ag of 5x5 then i suppose it is 6ppc tho 30br has shot better....once....
no clue as to who has 10 x5 ag.....

define, then make claims...

Well it is painfully obvious to me that you didn't read the whole thread as th op claims the .222 is the most accurate cartridge period the end no matter what distance, 100-1000 yards the .222 rules the roost! wind no wind it just don't matter, you really don't even have to aim it, it will put them all into one hole at any distance period the end!!
Wayne.

[/quote]
I have missed nothing, I have been on board since the beginning, Oh and I wasn't picking on you, you need to get that chip you have on your shoulder OFF as you seem to always be looking for trouble on almost every thread your on . I was being sarcastic to the op I would have to agree with most of what you said so lighten up and have some fun on a thread that is so ridiculous it's funny, and like many have said he is just a troll, I shouldn't respond at all but it kind of relaxes me and takes me away from all the precision minded threads that I get involved with.
Wayne.

 

[Hombre0321]

bozo, Not just hear man its every other forum as well. Sent you a PM.

Roland

 

[Hombre0321]

Hey Mike In Colorado, There you go again, making demands on people. He doesn't have to define anything to you, and he can make any claim he wants. Sense when did you get the job of thread police?

Roland

 

[stinnett1981]

The usual term is a troll. Best to not feed the trolls.

[br]
+1 They used to hang out under bridges. I guess the internet has enabled everybody.

Anybody with young kids knows this guy. Everybody on this forum know him too!

10 pages ??? what the heck guess I should jump in :-\

 

[bozo699]

bozo, Not just hear man its every other forum as well. Sent you a PM.

Roland

Thank's Roland, I know all to well and p.m returned
Wayne.

 

[ar10ar15man]

gee bozo..i could not HEAR the sarcasism in your voice...

so i had to go back and read a little...which you obviously did not....[
and while i dissagree..he did say this on the 2 or 3 page..
"With that said of the .222 I'd have to agree on the 6ppc for 300 yds and beyond"
so i think you have missed something....
dont pick on me go look what i said...

quote author=bozo699 link=topic=3806434.msg36206578#msg36206578 date=1365210158]

i'll admit , i did not read 10 pages of discussion.
as in most things, one must first DEFINE before searching.
1 shot hitting the dot from a cold clean bbl..no sighters.
3 shot
5 shot
10 shot
20shot.....
what distance ??
a 222 rem will not likely beat a 308 win at 600 yds
and a 308 will not likely beat a 300 win mag at 1000yds..and then there is the dasher....

if single target 5 shot at 100 ..the winner is 222rem..as no one has beat that record.
if ag of 5x5 then i suppose it is 6ppc tho 30br has shot better....once....
no clue as to who has 10 x5 ag.....

define, then make claims...

Well it is painfully obvious to me that you didn't read the whole thread as th op claims the .222 is the most accurate cartridge period the end no matter what distance, 100-1000 yards the .222 rules the roost! wind no wind it just don't matter, you really don't even have to aim it, it will put them all into one hole at any distance period the end!!
Wayne.

I have missed nothing, I have been on board since the beginning, Oh and I wasn't picking on you, you need to get that chip you have on your shoulder OFF as you seem to always be looking for trouble on almost every thread your on . I was being sarcastic to the op I would have to agree with most of what you said so lighten up and have some fun on a thread that is so ridiculous it's funny, and like many have said he is just a troll, I shouldn't respond at all but it kind of relaxes me and takes me away from all the precision minded threads that I get involved with.
Wayne.
[/quote]

 

[ar10ar15man]

roland
most adults add something to the thread.
typical of you , you attack a poster, and do not address the thread.

Hey Mike In Colorado, There you go again, making demands on people. He doesn't have to define anything to you, and he can make any claim he wants. Sense when did you get the job of thread police?

Roland

 

[bozo699]

gee bozo..i could not HEAR the sarcasism in your voice...

so i had to go back and read a little...which you obviously did not....[
and while i dissagree..he did say this on the 2 or 3 page..
"With that said of the .222 I'd have to agree on the 6ppc for 300 yds and beyond"
so i think you have missed something....
dont pick on me go look what i said...

quote author=bozo699 link=topic=3806434.msg36206578#msg36206578 date=1365210158]

i'll admit , i did not read 10 pages of discussion.
as in most things, one must first DEFINE before searching.
1 shot hitting the dot from a cold clean bbl..no sighters.
3 shot
5 shot
10 shot
20shot.....
what distance ??
a 222 rem will not likely beat a 308 win at 600 yds
and a 308 will not likely beat a 300 win mag at 1000yds..and then there is the dasher....

if single target 5 shot at 100 ..the winner is 222rem..as no one has beat that record.
if ag of 5x5 then i suppose it is 6ppc tho 30br has shot better....once....
no clue as to who has 10 x5 ag.....

define, then make claims...

Well it is painfully obvious to me that you didn't read the whole thread as th op claims the .222 is the most accurate cartridge period the end no matter what distance, 100-1000 yards the .222 rules the roost! wind no wind it just don't matter, you really don't even have to aim it, it will put them all into one hole at any distance period the end!!
Wayne.

I have missed nothing, I have been on board since the beginning, Oh and I wasn't picking on you, you need to get that chip you have on your shoulder OFF as you seem to always be looking for trouble on almost every thread your on . I was being sarcastic to the op I would have to agree with most of what you said so lighten up and have some fun on a thread that is so ridiculous it's funny, and like many have said he is just a troll, I shouldn't respond at all but it kind of relaxes me and takes me away from all the precision minded threads that I get involved with.
Wayne.

[/quote]
Mike,
I am sorry ,...everyone else could
Wayne.

 

[LawrenceHanson]

Gentlemen,

Please don't feed the trolls. It gives them diarrhoea and makes them irritable. No sarcasm intended.

Understand, that I am attempting to derail this conversation, thereby killing this thread for once and for all.

Why can't we all just get along?

LE Hanson

 

[bozo699]

Gentlemen,

Please don't feed the trolls. It gives them diarrhoea and makes them irritable. No sarcasm intended.

LE Hanson

Okay Lawrence
Wayne

 

[BigDMT]

Here's what I think every time I see this thread clogging up my unread messages box;

It's like a little kid who does something really funny and gets a group of adults laughing really hard, but then he keeps trying to do the same thing to keep everybody laughing. Unfortunately the child does not realize that it is not very funny after the first or second time and it is time to stop, so it just becomes annoying after that.

 

[Longfeather]

Here's what I think every time I see this thread clogging up my unread messages box;

It's like a little kid who does something really funny and gets a group of adults laughing really hard, but then he keeps trying to do the same thing to keep everybody laughing. Unfortunately the child does not realize that it is not very funny after the first or second time and it is time to stop, so it just becomes annoying after that.

I agree this thread has gone awry. Ridiculous as some of the comments I've posted, so are those who have taken them literally. Let's see if we can get this back on track: The .222 holds the world 5 shot/100 yd group record. Its been verified...its made history. With that said I ask all you knowledgeable shooters what cartridge holds the 5 shot/200 yd group?.......The 5 shot/300 yd group?........The 5 shot/600 yd group?........The 5 shot/1000 yd group? I'm at your mercy gentlemen............we'll discuss agg later......

 

[drumcorpschamp]

Oh...ok. Wait....which silly person in this thread is MikeinCO?

 

[ar10ar15man]

5 shoot 1000 group light gun ibs
5-Shot Group 1.397" Tom Sarver 7/7/2007
Tom was shooting a big 30 wildcat he calls the “300 Hulk”, a shortened 338 Lapua Magnum necked down to 30 caliber, pushing 240gr Sierra MatchKings (0.711 BC) at close to 3000 fps.

 

[ar10ar15man]

ibs 10 shot heavy gun
10-Shot Group 3.044" Joel Pendergraft 4/18/2009
He was shooting a .300 Ackley Improved.

 

[ar10ar15man]

ibs 600 yd lg groups 5 shots
Group 0.699" Sam Hall 6/12/10
shooting a 6mm Dasher,

 

[ar10ar15man]

ibs 600 yd heavy gun 5 shot
Group 0.404" John Lewis 4/26/08
308 winchester !

 

[bozo699]

Oh...ok. Wait....which silly person in this thread is MikeinCO?

Really?...... he's the argumentative one lol.
Wayne.

 

[Hombre0321]

roland
most adults add something to the thread.
typical of you , you attack a poster, and do not address the thread.

Hey Mike In Colorado, There you go again, making demands on people. He doesn't have to define anything to you, and he can make any claim he wants. Sense when did you get the job of thread police?

Roland

Well Mike as usual you are wrong again. I contributed to this thread in the very early stages when it was actually about the OP's orginal thread point.

As to attacking a poster ( I guess you mean you Mike) I have no need to attack you, you do plenty well at that on your own.

Roland