• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Questions about Weight-Sorting Cases

I didn't keep a record my groups but shot 1/2 of the testloads and plan to reload again. I write my weights on my brass with a sharpie but some smeared. When I reweigh the brass I'll submit my findings. However I don't plan to reload until I purchase a replacement Lee Neck sizing die. I got too much runout using my standard dies compared to last time when I used my old Lee neck sizing collet die.
 
A lot can be said for the mental game. I also weight sort cases and
bullets. Winter was hard this year so it helps pass the time. Now I just
shot a .628" group at 500 yards and repeated with .871" group using
this method. I wonder if they would have been tighter if I weight sorted
my BR2's.....?? We'll save that argument for another day !!
I cannot claim that weight by volume vs weight by volume makes a difference from my 7.7x58 case separation. I was trying to limit variation to find the most accurate load for now. The only thing I could infer from my last test results was that my groups changed as the length changed. My groups were tightening.. Still I have to retest. A constant strong wind picked up across the range for my last string of test loads and I printed a nice a horizontal string holes.
 
With case weight to volume correlation questioned by many, I can see your point.
Case volume, percent of fill, some even shooting over 100% fill, volume just seems to be a little important.
Those that load to 80% fill case it probably won't matter. It's just empty space.
Measure powder to +/- a tenth of a grain (good enough?) case weight/volume won't be seen on target.
Most will shoot like headstamps/years because brass matters. Mixed brands/weights do seem to matter. Lapua is called out because it is good and closely matched (I can't because not available for my cartridge).
Seems neck tension and nothing else really matters.
If you take great care with most steps in reloading and seem to be stuck breaking 1/2MOA for groups then practice more, improve wind reading skills, but if charge density matters (case volume) just a little, and it's pretty much FREE. WHY NOT?
Even a gain of 1/8 MOA would be welcome for the minor effort required.

I will repeat what I said in an earlier post;
Most weight to volume tests and charts are not precise enough to determine correlation.
Volume changes from virgin, sized, once fired, sized and fired again. That matters to some.
 
Last edited:
As pressure builds, the case wall is pressed to the chamber wall well down the case, probably to just above the case head, and the head is driven to the bolt face; I consider that the relevant volume of the case, not the volume after spring-back. The void in the extractor groove and between the case head and chamber wall are the only voids when the cartridge is fired.

I did an experiment several years ago to determine just how much effect brass weight has on .223 loads. I used WW brass (sized, trimmed and deburred, primer pockets uniformed, flash holes deburred, and neck turned) , WSR primers, charges of RL-15 or N-550 powder weighed to 0.1 gr, and 75 gr A-Max bullets. Using the lightest and heaviest cases (sorted from 1000 once-fired I had on hand), I had two lots of 10 cases with a 3 gr difference in weight. The average muzzle velocity difference was 16 fps, just a bit more than the 12 fps due to 0.1 gr of powder. I choose to sort 0.5 gr lots of .223 brass for my long range loads, but the effect will only matter at 800-1000 yards - the vertical displacement on the target from such a small velocity change is negligible at shorter distances. Unless you control all other sources of variation, the effect of brass weight is negligible. I also shoot .284, and because the brass is twice as heavy I batch in 1 gr lots.
 
With case weight to volume correlation questioned by many, I can see your point.
Case volume, percent of fill, some even shooting over 100% fill, volume just seems to be a little important.
Those that load to 80% fill case it probably won't matter. It's just empty space.
Measure powder to +/- a tenth of a grain (good enough?) case weight/volume won't be seen on target.
Most will shoot like headstamps/years because brass matters. Mixed brands/weights do seem to matter. Lapua is called out because it is good and closely matched (I can't because not available for my cartridge).
Seems neck tension and nothing else really matters.
If you take great care with most steps in reloading and seem to be stuck breaking 1/2MOA for groups then practice more, improve wind reading skills, but if charge density matters (case volume) just a little, and it's pretty much FREE. WHY NOT?
Even a gain of 1/8 MOA would be welcome for the minor effort required.

I will repeat what I said in an earlier post;
Most weight to volume tests and charts are not precise enough to determine correlation.
Volume changes from virgin, sized, once fired, sized and fired again. That matters to some.
if your gun only shoots 1/2 moa, you should not be in this conversation. 1/4 is the starting point for long range.....
 
I'm prepping new cases for my 6.5x55 and have chamfered the flashholes, trimmed them to the same length, and neck-turned them. These are Lapua cases, and I weighed 40 and found them all to be within about 1 gr. in weight--from a low of 176.8 gr. to a high of 177.9. I thought I'd sort them into two groups--the lightest 20 and the heaviest 20. If I do it this way, the weight variation in each group of 20 will be about .5 gr.

Here are my question:

1. Is this sorting worth the effort? To be sure, it didn't take much time, but if I passed on the sorting I'd have cases varying by up to 1 gr. in weight in groups shot.

2. In my two groups of 20 cases--with the variation in each of the two groups of 20 cases running .5 gr.--is this sufficient closeness in case weight for you guys shooting competitively? That is, in any group of 5 shot, the maximum case weight variation would be .5 gr., and in some groups shot, it would be less than that.
The theory says you should sort based on volume. I sort trimmed brass based on weight and I assume 0.3gr variance. Out of 1 Lapua box I usually end up with 3 lots of about 25 cases (which is what I need for a single match). The outliers are used for training.
 
if your gun only shoots 1/2 moa, you should not be in this conversation. 1/4 is the starting point for long range.....
I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….
vvv
 
Last edited:
I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….
You're killing me.
You mean to say that everyone isn't shooting 2.5" aggs at a grand???????
Pure blasphemy!!!!

Thanks for speaking the truth.

CW
 
I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….
vvv
IN CONTEXT...
HE SAID HE WAS SHOOTING 1/2 AT 100...I SAID 1/4....I NEVER SAID 1/4 AT 1000
DO NOT PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH
 
Here is a pic of a test I shot at 600 yards

View attachment 1335504
The Ops weight variation is much smaller than this test.
CW
Did you adjust the scope or not use the same point of aim for these groups?

And I have an observation that may be relevant. I have seen pressure go up with the same charge in neck size only brass that was a very close fit to the chamber when compared to the same load with full length sized brass that has some wiggle room in the chamber. I think Stretching the brass removes some energy from the system and acts as a slight pressure dampener. I do not think this is the case if you're full length sizing leads to compressed charges with the same mass of powder. At that point I think it does more to add to the pressure than it helps.
 
Last edited:
Did you adjust the scope or not use the same point of aim for these groups?

And I have an observation that may be relevant. I have seen pressure go up with the same charge in neck size only brass that was a very close fit to the chamber when compared to the same load with full length sized brass that has some wiggle room in the chamber. I think Stretching the brass removes some energy from the system and acts as a slight pressure dampener. I do not think this is the case if you're full length sizing leads to compressed charges with the same mass of powder. At that point I think it does more to add to the pressure than it helps.
Okay, great question.

That picture of two groups was actually one group. It was shot round-robin.
In other words the bullets are colored with a sharpie. All rounds shot at he same target, alternating between colors. The goal is to "even-out" or "level" the atmospheric conditions, so as to better see the one change (case-weight) in the test.

I hope this helps
CW
 
Okay, great question.

That picture of two groups was actually one group. It was shot round-robin.
In other words the bullets are colored with a sharpie. All rounds shot at he same target, alternating between colors. The goal is to "even-out" or "level" the atmospheric conditions, so as to better see the one change (case-weight) in the test.

I hope this helps
CW
Very nice methodology. That is exactly as it should be done. Interesting to see the difference in average point of impact height between those sets.

How did you process this brass? Sizing die type, other dimensional controls such as trimming turning ect, and when in that process did you weigh them?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,304
Messages
2,215,896
Members
79,519
Latest member
DW79
Back
Top