old_heli_logger
Gold $$ Contributor
These very slight variations are exactly why I pick the middle of an accuracy node
precision long range shooters..we doI'd be more interested in the neck tension. Who cares if the case weight varies a little?
John
I cannot claim that weight by volume vs weight by volume makes a difference from my 7.7x58 case separation. I was trying to limit variation to find the most accurate load for now. The only thing I could infer from my last test results was that my groups changed as the length changed. My groups were tightening.. Still I have to retest. A constant strong wind picked up across the range for my last string of test loads and I printed a nice a horizontal string holes.A lot can be said for the mental game. I also weight sort cases and
bullets. Winter was hard this year so it helps pass the time. Now I just
shot a .628" group at 500 yards and repeated with .871" group using
this method. I wonder if they would have been tighter if I weight sorted
my BR2's.....?? We'll save that argument for another day !!
There are a bunch of variables in bullet accuracy. Case weight is probably one of the least well correlated with precision. That was my point. Do you use brass only one time as well?precision long range shooters..we do
do you shoot 1000 yd br ???There are a bunch of variables in bullet accuracy. Case weight is probably one of the least well correlated with precision. That was my point. Do you use brass only one time as well?
John
if your gun only shoots 1/2 moa, you should not be in this conversation. 1/4 is the starting point for long range.....With case weight to volume correlation questioned by many, I can see your point.
Case volume, percent of fill, some even shooting over 100% fill, volume just seems to be a little important.
Those that load to 80% fill case it probably won't matter. It's just empty space.
Measure powder to +/- a tenth of a grain (good enough?) case weight/volume won't be seen on target.
Most will shoot like headstamps/years because brass matters. Mixed brands/weights do seem to matter. Lapua is called out because it is good and closely matched (I can't because not available for my cartridge).
Seems neck tension and nothing else really matters.
If you take great care with most steps in reloading and seem to be stuck breaking 1/2MOA for groups then practice more, improve wind reading skills, but if charge density matters (case volume) just a little, and it's pretty much FREE. WHY NOT?
Even a gain of 1/8 MOA would be welcome for the minor effort required.
I will repeat what I said in an earlier post;
Most weight to volume tests and charts are not precise enough to determine correlation.
Volume changes from virgin, sized, once fired, sized and fired again. That matters to some.
The theory says you should sort based on volume. I sort trimmed brass based on weight and I assume 0.3gr variance. Out of 1 Lapua box I usually end up with 3 lots of about 25 cases (which is what I need for a single match). The outliers are used for training.I'm prepping new cases for my 6.5x55 and have chamfered the flashholes, trimmed them to the same length, and neck-turned them. These are Lapua cases, and I weighed 40 and found them all to be within about 1 gr. in weight--from a low of 176.8 gr. to a high of 177.9. I thought I'd sort them into two groups--the lightest 20 and the heaviest 20. If I do it this way, the weight variation in each group of 20 will be about .5 gr.
Here are my question:
1. Is this sorting worth the effort? To be sure, it didn't take much time, but if I passed on the sorting I'd have cases varying by up to 1 gr. in weight in groups shot.
2. In my two groups of 20 cases--with the variation in each of the two groups of 20 cases running .5 gr.--is this sufficient closeness in case weight for you guys shooting competitively? That is, in any group of 5 shot, the maximum case weight variation would be .5 gr., and in some groups shot, it would be less than that.
I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….if your gun only shoots 1/2 moa, you should not be in this conversation. 1/4 is the starting point for long range.....
You're killing me.I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….
IN CONTEXT...I think a bit of clarification is in order, as very few guys shoot 1/4 moa to a 1000 yards. Yes we may shoot that at shorter range of strive to as a goal but let’s be honest….
vvv
2021 IBS 1K Nationals
It only lets me attach 6 files. Edit for Jason's 2 Gun SOY.forum.accurateshooter.com
Did you adjust the scope or not use the same point of aim for these groups?Here is a pic of a test I shot at 600 yards
View attachment 1335504
The Ops weight variation is much smaller than this test.
CW
Okay, great question.Did you adjust the scope or not use the same point of aim for these groups?
And I have an observation that may be relevant. I have seen pressure go up with the same charge in neck size only brass that was a very close fit to the chamber when compared to the same load with full length sized brass that has some wiggle room in the chamber. I think Stretching the brass removes some energy from the system and acts as a slight pressure dampener. I do not think this is the case if you're full length sizing leads to compressed charges with the same mass of powder. At that point I think it does more to add to the pressure than it helps.
No one said 100 yards until you said it just now so only thing in your mouth is your foot.if your gun only shoots 1/2 moa, you should not be in this conversation. 1/4 is the starting point for long range.....
Very nice methodology. That is exactly as it should be done. Interesting to see the difference in average point of impact height between those sets.Okay, great question.
That picture of two groups was actually one group. It was shot round-robin.
In other words the bullets are colored with a sharpie. All rounds shot at he same target, alternating between colors. The goal is to "even-out" or "level" the atmospheric conditions, so as to better see the one change (case-weight) in the test.
I hope this helps
CW
trueNo one said 100 yards until you said it just now so only thing in your mouth is your foot.