Adam in WI
Practically lives here
Hmmm...might make loading for any rifle using AR type magazines a problem.
Wouldn't you know, they just so happen to have a new cartridge to take care of that...
Hmmm...might make loading for any rifle using AR type magazines a problem.
A trip to the JBM Ballistics site using an 8 twist as the default will reveal much. Then you can input different velocities and get a clearer picture of Randy's excellent advice: "You can't get there from here."That’s pretty long. The 75 bthp of theirs that I use in the.223 is .981long.
When will these be for sale I have a 7 twist 22-250AI that these sound perfect for…..As Al mentioned, it will take at least a 7.5 twist to get to a 1.5 SG
to stabilize the 22 cal 62g VT's
And if you run them over 3300-3400 fps you'll be pushing them to explode.
That's the biggest problem with a long high BC small dia. bullet.
You need a fast twist to stabilize them, but then you run the risk of over spinning them.
Unless Hornady has found a way to improve the jackets from over spinning failure.
I run the 53's out of a 12" twist 20" AR to mid 3300's......Is there really a need to run them to 3300-3400 fps? I run my 53vmax out of my 7tw at 3313 fps. Killing pdogs over 500 yards, no problem. I'll give the 62 a try when available.
Is there really a need to run them to 3300-3400 fps? I run my 53vmax out of my 7tw at 3313 fps. Killing pdogs over 500 yards, no problem. I'll give the 62 a try when available.
My load is the lower node. 26" barrel. At that speed, pressure, and accuracy I didn't see any need to stand on it.I run the 53's out of a 12" twist 20" AR to mid 3300's......
I think Graf’s is taking backorder for these bullets now.When will these be for sale I have a 7 twist 22-250AI that these sound perfect for…..
You must be doing something wrong because I get them to shoot out of everything I haveIf only the 87s would shoot.
I don't think that will be an issue. The 73 eld-m is only .004" shorter and fits in the magazine just fine.Hmmm...might make loading for any rifle using AR type magazines a problem.
The new American way for about everything!224 62 gr -- It appears "engineers" took the 73 gr eld m, removed 11 grs of lead of the top of the core. This shifted the weight rearward and most likely made the bullet more explosive. So less lead(cheaper especially by the million). Same machines, same jacket, less lead(air is free). Charge more for the "new" product that costs less to produce.
I wonder that too. Id like to see something in 17 and 20. The thing is no factory rifles have the twist that would be needed. Maybe they will release new cartridges with the needed twist and freebore in factory guns. I also think this might inspire sierra and or Berger to develope projectiles to compete with Hornady.Does anyone have any insight or speculation on if they will product a 20cal version of an eld-vt?
I think a 45-50gr .204 with a G1 bc near or over .350 would be super.
While not a big Hornady fan, with a good barrel with an appropriate free bore length and diameter, the 87 VMax has shot well in every 6mm chambering I've tried them in. Twist rates from 9 to 12 and chambers in 243W, 243 AI, 6MM Jet, 6MM Rem., 6 Ackley and a couple of 6BR's.
In an unknown barrel, the Nosler 70 BTip and the 87 VMax are the first two non-BR quality bullets I try.
Good shootin'.-Al