IME, there might well be extreme limitations to this, but I've spent some time testing this very thing, this year. Testing tells me it's hard to discern "over twist" but longer bullets that require faster twist are less accurate. Case in point. I've been testing a 6mm 10 twist. The most accurate bullets, by very little in that twist, are 68's. Trying various 90-95gr bullets, more "suitable" to that twist, it appears that accuracy follows bullet length more than weight or twist rate. ...fwiw. Shorter, lighter bullets have consistently shot best at short range...100-300. 80's appear to be a very good compromise of accuracy and bc in that twist. I strongly suspect that accuracy from the 6BR based cases, out to 600 at least, may be better with the 90-95 class bullets than the more common 105-108 bullets. If so, it may or may not need more testing, to optimze proper twist for the better performing bullets, ie. 90gr bullets in a 9.5-10 twist vs shooting them in a 8 twist. But again, my main point here is that I think it's hard to "over stabilize" a bullet, but with limitations to that statement.Even though the twist rate might not be optimal (‘over twisted’) would you consider a flat base bullet for 300yds that our BR colleagues use?
Last edited:













