• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Long range load development at 100 yards.

groundhogassassin said:
I recently did a ladder test for my .308 savage axis and went with a powder range to test that guys on here suggested to try. I shot three rounds each from 42.1 to 43.3gr in 0.3gr increments using your method Mr. Cortina. This is what it did. I feel like the big wide groups were results of something I was doing differently every shot, or it could have been a dirty barrel? Do you suggest shooting this again and trying to get better results before determining what charge to go with? I am using Varget powder, 165gr hornady sst bullets, 210m primers. seating depth is 2.260" to the ogive. I know it is touching the lands but I'm not positive as to how much of a jam it is.

Here is my method, I do not do ladder tests.
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/index.php?topic=3814361.msg36221455#msg36221455
 
Erik,
Was wandering if you could take a look at my targets at the bottom of page 103 and let me know what you think. Thank you sir! I really appreciate you helping us all out!!
 
L1986 said:
Erik,
Was wandering if you could take a look at my targets at the bottom of page 103 and let me know what you think. Thank you sir! I really appreciate you helping us all out!!

Do you have any chronograph readings? The groups are very inconsistent.

What rifle are you using? Tell us more about it.
 
Erik Cortina said:
L1986 said:
Erik,
Was wandering if you could take a look at my targets at the bottom of page 103 and let me know what you think. Thank you sir! I really appreciate you helping us all out!!

Do you have any chronograph readings? The groups are very inconsistent.

What rifle are you using? Tell us more about it.
I do have chrono readings but I'll have to post them later. The rifle is described in the post above the target pics but it's a savage action with a McGowan 22-250ai barrel.
 
I post it also here. Maybe someone can judge my target:

I followed Erik´s advice to load development ( http://forum.accurateshooter.com/index.php?topic=3814361.0 ). This is the first part of it. Bullet seated at jam and -0.20" and loads with 0.5gr increments. Please tell me - do you see any node there? I think something between load Nr. 17 and 18 would be interesting. Yes there is always a flyer, but i think i know the reasons for it - mirage and my bad trigger pull. So, by loads Nr. 17 and 18 there are always first 2 shots in one hole and third shots were my errors.

Click the link below for bigger preview.

100mNormaGoldenTarget130gr2015419dax0.jpg


http://img.janforman.com/100mNormaGoldenTarget130gr2015419dax0.jpg
 
groundhogassassin said:
I recently did a ladder test for my .308 savage axis and went with a powder range to test that guys on here suggested to try. I shot three rounds each from 42.1 to 43.3gr in 0.3gr increments using your method Mr. Cortina. This is what it did. I feel like the big wide groups were results of something I was doing differently every shot, or it could have been a dirty barrel? Do you suggest shooting this again and trying to get better results before determining what charge to go with? I am using Varget powder, 165gr hornady sst bullets, 210m primers. seating depth is 2.260" to the ogive. I know it is touching the lands but I'm not positive as to how much of a jam it is.

Keep going up with powder, you shouldn't reach pressure till 45-46 grains.
 
x_wolf said:
I post it also here. Maybe someone can judge my target:

I followed Erik´s advice to load development ( http://forum.accurateshooter.com/index.php?topic=3814361.0 ). This is the first part of it. Bullet seated at jam and -0.20" and loads with 0.5gr increments. Please tell me - do you see any node there? I think something between load Nr. 17 and 18 would be interesting. Yes there is always a flyer, but i think i know the reasons for it - mirage and my bad trigger pull. So, by loads Nr. 17 and 18 there are always first 2 shots in one hole and third shots were my errors.

Click the link below for bigger preview.

100mNormaGoldenTarget130gr2015419dax0.jpg


http://img.janforman.com/100mNormaGoldenTarget130gr2015419dax0.jpg

Try between 17 and 18.
How do you know the third shots were errors?
 
I always saw first two hits in same hole. Then by third shot I was able to recognize stronger mirage. This maked me little bit nervous and the point of aim wasn't perfect. Result was also not proper trigger pull (still waiting for the Jewell trigger...) This was relevant to these two groups (17 and 18). Weather was changing bit faster and causing this problem... Maybe it sounds like justification but I was trying my best. When I saw the one hole of first 2 shots by Nr. 17 and 18 I said to myself "...That's it...." and then came this damn mirage.

OK, thank you Erik, I was hoping for loads Nr. 17 and 18. I'll advance to the next step.
 
Ran the test on my fresh (15 rounds through it) 1941 USMC Sniper clone last Saturday. Ran them through OnTarget and this is what I got... (sorry no chrono numbers for this one either.)

Criterion 1:10 - 1903 Springfield Profile
168 SMK
IMR 4350
CCI BR 2
LC NM 62 Case

Vertical distance to aim point (as given by OnTarget) for each group was -

53.0 ~ -1.260
53.5 ~ -0.296
54.0 ~ 0.198
54.5 ~ 0.448
55.0 ~ 1.571
55.5 ~ 1.570
56.0 ~ 1.800
56.5 ~ 1.865
57.0 ~ 1.922
57.5 ~ 1.792

normal_IMG_4711.JPG


normal_1941-1.jpg


normal_1941-2.jpg


normal_1941-3.jpg


normal_1941-4.jpg


normal_1941-5.jpg
 
fspitzdorf said:
Erik,

Can you expound a bit on why?

Thanks,

Jamie

Because they impacted the same distance away from the aim point vertically, except for one shot. If you had chronograph numbers it would be much easier to find the node, but since you don't, this is the best guess I can come up with as to where the node is.
 
Erik,
I was hoping for your input on this target. I am shooting a GAP 6.5 SAUM, 26" 8.7 twist barrel. 140 Berger Hybrids, .020" jump w/ H-1000 & unfired Norma brass. I have about 75 rounds through the barrel. From what I understand, the goal w/ this bullet is 3100 fps after 100-200 rounds through the barrel. I'm figuring that with a new barrel, I should be looking for about 3000fps. I did an initial velocity work-up and got the following velocities (only one round per charge):
60.0gr: 2953
60.5: 2986
61.0: 2986
62.0: 3054
62.5: 3061
I'm thinking either 60.4 or 62.2 as a starting point. I realize that its not optimal to do this with unfired brass but that's all I had. I'm looking for a place to start.
Thanks,
Bill
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1410.jpg
    IMG_1410.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 249
bill123 said:
Erik,
I was hoping for your input on this target. I am shooting a GAP 6.5 SAUM, 26" 8.7 twist barrel. 140 Berger Hybrids, .020" jump w/ H-1000 & unfired Norma brass. I have about 75 rounds through the barrel. From what I understand, the goal w/ this bullet is 3100 fps after 100-200 rounds through the barrel. I'm figuring that with a new barrel, I should be looking for about 3000fps. I did an initial velocity work-up and got the following velocities (only one round per charge):
60.0gr: 2953
60.5: 2986
61.0: 2986
62.0: 3054
62.5: 3061
I'm thinking either 60.4 or 62.2 as a starting point. I realize that its not optimal to do this with unfired brass but that's all I had. I'm looking for a place to start.
Thanks,
Bill

Start at 60.0
I don't believe in the "target speed" theory, I believe in doing a detailed load work up and selecting the load that provides the most consistent speeds and accuracy. Accuracy first, speed second (assuming you will be supersonic at the range you intend to shoot at).
 
bill123 said:
Thanks for the reply. Can you explain what you mean by start at 60.0?

I thought you were asking for a starting point to do powder test again with fireformed brass. Why did you only get velocity for one shot on each charge?
 
Erik Cortina said:
bill123 said:
Thanks for the reply. Can you explain what you mean by start at 60.0?

I thought you were asking for a starting point to do powder test again with fireformed brass. Why did you only get velocity for one shot on each charge?

Sorry for the confusion. My plan was to do a pressure work up first (shooting 1 round in increasing .5gr increments) to find what GAP considered a good MV range. That was my first shooting session (target not posted). The target that I posted was an OCW round robin based on the idea that I would test around 3000fps. That session was 3 shots per .3gr increment. For the posted target, I am trying to discern which charge I should work with.
 
bill123 said:
Erik Cortina said:
bill123 said:
Thanks for the reply. Can you explain what you mean by start at 60.0?

I thought you were asking for a starting point to do powder test again with fireformed brass. Why did you only get velocity for one shot on each charge?

Sorry for the confusion. My plan was to do a pressure work up first (shooting 1 round in increasing .5gr increments) to find what GAP considered a good MV range. That was my first shooting session (target not posted). The target that I posted was an OCW round robin based on the idea that I would test around 3000fps. That session was 3 shots per .3gr increment. For the posted target, I am trying to discern which charge I should work with.

Shoot groups until you encounter pressure signs. You will be able to tell where your node is. Use a chronograph when you test.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,900
Messages
2,206,073
Members
79,207
Latest member
bbkersch
Back
Top