MikeMcCasland
Team Texas F-T/R
I guess I've had worse luck with the Bluetooth on my LR. I'm using an S9 phone, and it drops connection on mine pretty often. Once I got the buttons/menus etc. down after the ~2nd trip, I just kept using that.
Still, of the chronographs I've used, the LR is absolutely the best. Keep in mind guys, we're only listing the negatives of the LR...if we listed the negatives of the others, you might start to see why a LR is so nice.
It's also not as though every 'con' I listed is insurmountable, because it's not. So long as you aren't horrible with 'technology', you'll have it down after a couple of range trips. The point I was trying to make is that the 'out of box experience' isn't as simplified as something like a MS.
I've owned screened chronographs, the Magneto Speed, and the LR. I only use the LR these days, and everyone I know who's gone to the LR pretty much shares the same opinion.
Still, of the chronographs I've used, the LR is absolutely the best. Keep in mind guys, we're only listing the negatives of the LR...if we listed the negatives of the others, you might start to see why a LR is so nice.
It's also not as though every 'con' I listed is insurmountable, because it's not. So long as you aren't horrible with 'technology', you'll have it down after a couple of range trips. The point I was trying to make is that the 'out of box experience' isn't as simplified as something like a MS.
I've owned screened chronographs, the Magneto Speed, and the LR. I only use the LR these days, and everyone I know who's gone to the LR pretty much shares the same opinion.