People keep putting made up numbers on this website.Hmmm??? 250°C/480°F for how long?
People keep putting made up numbers on this website.Hmmm??? 250°C/480°F for how long?
Nice info.The one good place to use Tempilaq in teaching neck annealing was to demonstrate to the students how the heat propagates down the case body. (That is also a back-handed way of saying the internet lore of using the 750F on the necks is not a good method.)
By painting a stripe of 400F Tempilaq down the case body and then running it through the process, the trainees got to see how far down the body the 400F line would go.
Generally, even when using a relatively "slow" flame annealing time, the 400F goes roughly a body diameter below the body-shoulder junction, and less when regular rates were used.
If you noticed the "patina" created on Straighshooter1's brass photos, somewhere about the end of that patina is where the 400F level would be seen. This level is way above the level where the case body tends to fail due to stretching. YMMV
View attachment 1609198
Jim,We have member that I believe works with Capstone, he might shed some light on Lapua’s annealing process. Maybe @barefooter56 will weigh in.
A question for Straightshooter1~ what is the end result you are seeking ?
Is it sizing consistency or bullet seating consistency or both and how are you confirming the results ?
Thx for testing and sharing.
Jim
The plot looks like the length of the indent plotted and not the VHN? At least he gave the load on the indenter it's an ASTM requirement. What's max and min. mean.When he suspected the hardness value of a piece of virgin factory brass was HV = 95, he wasn't wrong.
It just took some time to get him up to speed.
For your background, here is a public domain version of a M855 case.
View attachment 1615622
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!!
Based on the hardness numbers he must be over 1200F for a fraction of a second.Thought some of you might find this of interest:
I just happened to come across this YouTube video where the where the guy actual had some Vickers hardness testing done for his test. Like I found in my less precise hardness testing, he found substantial increase in hardness after sizing. But like he mentioned, how much the necks are worked (reduced then expanded again) will vary the amount of increase in hardness after the annealing process. He doesn't say what he's using for his annealing process, but given the short periods of time, I'd bet it's done with an induction annealer.
How much sizing the brass will harden the brass depends on how much movement is going in the sizing process. If the die is squeezing the neck down by .014 then expanding it back out by .003", seating a bullet and firing it again that expands them out that .014. That much movement back and forth will firm then up nicely.I'm just now getting to this thread, but it is fascinating to me because it seems like it is hard to over anneal and not be able to reharden just by resizing. However, I managed to anneal about 20 pieces of brass, half Lapua and half Norma that were so soft that a bullet couldn't be held firmly in place, even after 2 or 3 resizings. I now keep them around to test for glow when setting up my annealer's timing, cause otherwise they're garbage. Aside from that, I have no idea how i could have over annealed this brass so badly with just a few more seconds under the flame, at the most.
Actually no. Most of the time, my loads are fine. But with these loads, they often came apart as I loaded them so I took them out and recovered the bullets, primers, and powder.How much sizing the brass will harden the brass depends on how much movement is going in the sizing process. If the die is squeezing the neck down by .014 then expanding it back out by .003", seating a bullet and firing it again that expands them out that .014. That much movement back and forth will firm then up nicely.Though you can't get a bullet to be held firmly, you can still load them up and fire them by hand loading them into the chamber, huh???
Not to techy but I think it's very informitive. I like all his data. I did microhardness testing for 45 years and I am very familiar with the procedure. I wish I had a copy of all the ASTM conversion charts.Thought some of you might find this of interest:
I just happened to come across this YouTube video where the guy actual had some Vickers hardness testing done for his test. Like I found in my less precise hardness testing, he found substantial increase in hardness after sizing. But like he mentioned, how much the necks are worked (reduced then expanded again) will vary the amount of increase in hardness after the annealing process. He doesn't say what he's using for his annealing process, but given the short periods of time, I'd bet it's done with an induction annealer.
https://www.buehler.com/assets/posters/Hardness-Conversion-ASTM_10-20-1.pdfI wish I had a copy of all the ASTM conversion charts.
Good enough. Data is given in several hardness scales sometimes making it difficult to relate to. I'm getting old, I forget what the chart looks like to convert filar length to Knoop or Vickers hardness. Again I question why he as 2.5 KG load on the vertical axis of his chart. Is this a typo? Anyone that did microhardness testing would properly label the chart. I never used more than a 500 gram load testing to military and aircraft specs. I don't think you can load more than 500 gr on most microhardness testers. 2.5 KG is a Brinnel tester spec.https://www.buehler.com/assets/posters/Hardness-Conversion-ASTM_10-20-1.pdf
Will this do, or do you need the full versions?
ETA: The full ASTM have copyright protections, and they want $$ for them.
As a former Branch Chairman, I am bound by contracts to play it straight.
Most public domain stuff doesn't go very low on the HV or Knoop scales.