Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heavies said:thefitter said:I have always thought that they annealing processes that are discussed here and on other boards was fledgling experimentation and totally individual at best. Everyone seems to do it differently and until I see hard data like the OP was describing I will continue to search myself for the formula that I believe works for me. Because I have learned that much of this reloading "science" is faith based.
I appreciate the OPs effort.
I agree with you Fitter.
That is one of the reasons I am so interested in the inductive process. Differences in the thickness of brass the torch method, even on a timed machine, will be hit or miss at best. Uneven heating will be the ultimate outcome when trying to raise the temperature from the outside of the neck.
With the inductive process the heating is on a molecular level, thus creating an even heat, regardless of the thickness variance. There will be a difference in the tempering due to these variances, however I am thinking that due to the process being even heating, (inside the neck, outside the neck, and in the core or the metal itself) will tend to give better consistency to the process.
I, my self, cannot do this sort of testing, for I have neither the time, budget, or equipment to entertain many of my hypothesis. I am slowly building my tool chest and skill level to try things out, but I really appreciate all the knowledge I have gained from this forum. This is the reason I love this forum. It gives me a place to throw out the ideas and get the experienced comments, from those able to test, and those who have done this before.
TonyR said:... A very fine shooter I know told me early on that he is sure a lot of what he does is unnecessary. He just doesn't know which things!
TonyR said:... My working assumption is that the variability of all of the things, big and little, that show up on the target is additive so anything I can reasonably do to reduce variability pays off either in a big way or in the sum of a lot off little ways...
thefitter said:Well said. Although I will argue the time involved. This whole reloading thing has really cut into my workout time and it's showing in my waist line.
sleepygator said:thefitter said:Well said. Although I will argue the time involved. This whole reloading thing has really cut into my workout time and it's showing in my waist line.
Rig up a linkage so that you can do situps and resize cases at the same time.![]()
thefitter said:sleepygator said:thefitter said:Well said. Although I will argue the time involved. This whole reloading thing has really cut into my workout time and it's showing in my waist line.
Rig up a linkage so that you can do situps and resize cases at the same time.![]()
It's funny you said that because I have noticed that my right forearm is getting bigger... oh wait... forget I said that!
thefitter said:You know whats next right? Ladder tests using different annealing time durations.
12 seconds
13 seconds
14 seconds
etc,.
Webster said:Great article on induction heating of cartridges. I think this is the future is they can keep the price down.
http://www.carolinamarksman.com/induction-annealing.html
DougMH said:Do you suppose all these manufacturers doing this procedure in a nearly identical manner could ALL be doing it wrong...