GotRDid
Gold $$ Contributor
So, you absolutely need RN and SP construction?Yep. After all the weapon was designed for indoor work so the neighbors wouldn't hear it.
So, you absolutely need RN and SP construction?Yep. After all the weapon was designed for indoor work so the neighbors wouldn't hear it.
I totally understand where you are coming from, but like above, being that you are in AZ the difference from sea level may make them sub sonic. I am at Camp Lejeune, but have my farm in Ohio. I do most of my testing in NC, but have found that in Ohio, i get different results (1000 ft difference). Sound from the can is what I'm looking for. Other wise, why sub sonic. My go to for subs are 150gr round nose 30-30 bullets. Sometimes I'll get 170gr, but they both shoot well!Yep, fell victim. So loaded up 100 ctgs. using the Sierra load data for 150 grain sub-sonic ammo. Ran some through the speedo-meter and was sad to discover, they were 1159 fps (sub-sonic is 1123 fps at sea level). Not sub-sonic. Had to pull the rest and start over. That's what happens when you break the basic rule of loading a new cartridge. Load 10 and test. Shame on me.
While I fully recognize the problem exists, I wonder why we rarely if ever see or hear about.300 Blackout. Not such a good design. We see one of these blow-ups on the web every couple of months because the .300 BLK will chamber in typical .223 Rem barrels.
View attachment 1284429
.300 Blackout Fired in .223 Rem — Mistake Is Disasterous « Daily Bulletin
Photos and Facebook post by Tactical Rifle Shooters Yet another .300 Blackout disaster. Unfortunately, that .300 Blackout cartridge can fit in a .223 Rem chamber. Shooting a .308-caliber bullet in .223 bore is a recipe for disaster. <img src=https://accurateshooter.bulletin.accurateshooter.com
View attachment 1284430
I'll tackle this one since I have first hand experience with the Blowing Up part.While I fully recognize the problem exists, I wonder why we rarely if ever see or hear about
223 bolt actions blown up with 300 Blackout rounds
280 Remington/30.06 based rifles blown up by .308 win. based cartridges
There are so many different combinations where this potential exists, but it only seems to happen to 223/556 AR owners who chamber Blackout rounds.
Is it a poorly designed cartridge?
Poorly designed rifle?
Poor thinking by the operator?
Just something for people to think about.
What is the 1123fps based on? 65degF?they were 1159 fps (sub-sonic is 1123 fps at sea level). Not sub-sonic.
So the problem is the 223/556 AR shooters, because I don't think I have ever seen where a 300 Blackout blew up a 25-45 Sharps, or a 6X45?I'll tackle this one since I have first hand experience with the Blowing Up part.
Wrong cartridges get placed into bolt rifles periodically, but since everything works so much slower with a bolt rifle is get caught sooner/more often. Also, bolt rifles have a more distinct, individual look from one rifle to the next so less likely to accidentally commingle guns and ammo. When was last time you were on 100-yard line and looked down benches and saw 2 guys shooting the same bolt rifle. Also, majority of bolt rifles still use internal blind magazine/hinged floor plate. It is hard to ignore/overlook the ammo as you are manually feeding the rounds either directly into the chamber or loading the internal magazine.
The increased frequency with AR15's is a function of overlapping equipment and speed of activity. Identical magazines loaded with both .223/5.56 and 300BO. Identical rifles used for shooting both cartridges with no real discernable markings. Frequent use of both calibers in close proximity and perhaps even by same person during same range trip.
Finally, the rate of activity and type of shooting lends itself to increase in risk. AR15's are shot faster while shooting from a bench at the range, hunting, and participating in various dynamic shooting sports. Grab a mag and shove it in. If you are using the same exact magazines (PMags) loaded with .223/5.56 and 300BO that are tossed into a bag then a moment of carelessness and you just distractedly loaded the 300BO mag into your 5.56 AR15.
Interesting story, Oso. Hat's off to you and all the other good folks out there who try and educate the uneducated.
But when you walk back and try and identify the "critical moment," it was when your guest decided to chamber and fire a live round he found on the ground. Maybe not doing that needs to be part of the protocol.
The .300 Blackout is a fine cartridge, blessed with remarkable utility. But those of us who shoot it must walk the fairly narrow path it lights in front of us.
Pretty much like all guns, and all calibers.
Yes. You have to pay attention.Poor thinking by the operator?
I'll guess at this one.There are so many different combinations where this potential exists, but it only seems to happen to 223/556 AR owners who chamber Blackout rounds.
Bullet set back due to light crimps are a large number of the problems 300 BLK in 223/556 chambers. Part of what allows that is light powder charges for subs.Yes. You have to pay attention.
This is a long way from being the only cartridge capable of being chambered in the wrong firearm.
I watched two guys each with a 30-06 rifle. The one was really upset because his buddy's rifle kicked so little compared to his. When I looked the 'light' kicking 30-06 was being loaded with 270's! No harm done.
However I wondered if a 30-06 can be chambered in a 270? These guys were plenty strong enough to close a bolt. Thinking about it, I know there will an impressive 'jam' However to a point. Then wouldn't the bullet reseat itself deeper in the neck allowing the bolt to close?
If it can, you'll wind up with a similar picture that was posted above.
View attachment 1283955
Worked with supers yesterday and 135 gr Sierra SSPs in prep for Youth Whitetail weekend on Oct 9-10 here in KY.
Grandchildren of my Former Partner (shooting) and Son of a KTP Buddy will be using my BOs to hopefully take their first Deer. They are all 7-8 yrs old, and are excited to be going out with Papaw and Dad.
View attachment 1283958
As a follow up to our efforts to prepare for the Youth Hunt, Caden took a yearling Doe at about 40-43 yds in the timber. His first Deer and 8 yrs old and we are so proud. Paul is Caden’s Grandfather and the first Sniper I ever trained after my All Skills Firearms Instructor certification was complete (that was a long 18 months). Paul and I are both retired but are still close. Paul’s Father, Joe, passed away 2 months ago and Joe left me his Hunting rifle knowing I would take it (and Joe) hunting for the rest of my years. When the time comes, it will be given back to Caden if he sticks with hunting.
Thank You for letting me share.
GotRDid.
Thank you for sharing with Caden.
Really the list is endless. There are so many more cartridge today than just 30 years ago. One should be aware at all times..300 Blackout. Not such a good design. We see one of these blow-ups on the web every couple of months because the .300 BLK will chamber in typical .223 Rem barrels.
View attachment 1284429
.300 Blackout Fired in .223 Rem — Mistake Is Disasterous « Daily Bulletin
Photos and Facebook post by Tactical Rifle Shooters Yet another .300 Blackout disaster. Unfortunately, that .300 Blackout cartridge can fit in a .223 Rem chamber. Shooting a .308-caliber bullet in .223 bore is a recipe for disaster. <img src=https://accurateshooter.bulletin.accurateshooter.com
View attachment 1284430
While I fully recognize the problem exists, I wonder why we rarely if ever see or hear about
223 bolt actions blown up with 300 Blackout rounds
280 Remington/30.06 based rifles blown up by .308 win. based cartridges
There are so many different combinations where this potential exists, but it only seems to happen to 223/556 AR owners who chamber Blackout rounds.
Is it a poorly designed cartridge?
Poorly designed rifle?
Poor thinking by the operator?
Just something for people to think about.