Believe me, I get it. I am a member at 3 different shooting clubs in my home state, and due to finances, your system can't reasonably be considered for installation at any of them. As great as it sounds (and I've heard that it is indeed great), financial reality dictates that we can only consider options that we can afford. I think you will find that to be the case at *most* clubs in the US. At the end of the day, it's just a hobby.
Just a Hobby Woooo not with the gear I see on the mound. The demand for accuracy is very high with the same demand for longevity on a daily basis.
"Hobby" is now for me the operative word.Believe me, I get it. I am a member at 3 different shooting clubs in my home state, and due to finances, your system can't reasonably be considered for installation at any of them. As great as it sounds (and I've heard that it is indeed great), financial reality dictates that we can only consider options that we can afford. I think you will find that to be the case at *most* clubs in the US. At the end of the day, it's just a hobby.
Shotmarkers are $800 USThat sounds great. Get the price point down around the $1k USD mark and they’ll be a contender.
I’m sure there’s a direct correlation between shooting on expensive targets, and deciphering tricky wind.I hear via the grape vine GeoffR, that the Au Palma team kinda walked away with all the prizes is NZ. Congratulations to great bunch. I noticed they did most of their practicing on HEXTA expensive targets. HMM
I hear via the grape vine GeoffR, that the Au Palma team kinda walked away with all the prizes is NZ. Congratulations to great bunch. I noticed they did most of their practicing on HEXTA expensive targets. HMM[/QUOTE
Has any company contacted you about selling your rights to your system? If so you can recoup some of the cost of developing it, and possibly boost the effectiveness of the other systems on the market."Hobby" is now for me the operative word.
For us here in Australia - two of us - I think the end of the road has come. I have no interest or desire - or the resources - to consider putting my system into the mass market of the USA. That market is at least 150 times larger than it is here. The economies of scale simply don't allow something like my ET to flourish here, so it's not (and arguably never was) commercially viable. But I have had fun putting it together - mostly. I am seriously out of pocket but not broke.
Time to move on methinks.
G.
I hear via the grape vine GeoffR, that the Au Palma team kinda walked away with all the prizes is NZ. Congratulations to great bunch. I noticed they did most of their practicing on HEXTA expensive targets. HMM
I noticed they did most of their practicing on HEXTA expensive targets. HMM
Back on topic... I ran some rudimentary analysis using ShotMarker detail from the last LR match I was at to see what average times between shots were with the 'no delay' setting. To summarize, the fastest shot was 7 seconds, which I interpreted to mean it was fired about 5 seconds after the result of the previous shot was reported.
As a general trend, it looked to me like matches fired with a average shot delay of under 20 seconds scored higher than those fired with an average delay greater than 20 seconds, but it's hard to say the shorter delay accounts for that, and most of the 'cleans' were fired with an average shot delay of over 20 seconds. Should mention that conditions that day were almost ideal.
Maybe some will find this interesting, and perhaps have some thoughts on what the data is indicating.[/QUOTE
CROW can you call me Diffey 281 728 5246
Was told that once the match is complete, no worries about affecting system performance. Any other reasons for not allowing downloads?It highlights security as an important issue, is what the data is indicating to me.
Pretty sure everyone told Jade not to do this, but he did it anyway.Thank you Jade for getting this important discussion going. It has been very civil!
I think this thread demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of active f-class shooters in the U.S. agree that the "delay" is a core part of what makes High Power a unique and wonderful shooting sport. The delayed nature of scoring forces competitors to shoot through different wind conditions and removing the delay fundamentally changes the sport. So, for discussions sake, if we mostly agree that a delay should be preserved, the next question is, "What should the delay be?" I was involved in creating the precedent for 7 seconds...a funny story for some other time. But, I will say I just pulled that number out of my arse a few years back.
February of this year, I decided to get some actual data and recorded the pull times at the Southwest Nationals: see attachment. Keep in mind that the SWNs have not one, but two pullers per target and it is safe to say these are the most experienced high power competitors in the country. Yes, there were a few intrepid targets with consistent 5 second pull times. But, the average pull time was 10 seconds...with two pullers per target.
I plan to continue gathering data and and suspect the average pull time will be somewhere near 12 seconds in matches with just one puller. I encourage all of you to gather your own data on average pull times....you might be surprised just how slow people are.This is one of the key reasons why High Power/F-Class is NOT the same as benchrest. I very much want to keep the wind-reading element of our sport just like it is today because it is what makes it so challenging and rewarding.
Respectfully,
Scott Harris
PS. we are in the final stages of standing up a club in Phoenix that will use the Shot Marker system: with a 10 second delay.
Do you have data to back that claim? Or threat for that matter.The posts on this threat do not even come close to representing the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF ACTIVE F CLASS SHOOTERS IN THE US,