Brians356
Gold $$ Contributor
Last edited:
I think you may be misinformed about the virus being able to spread via food. Or at least the answer should be it depends on your definition of transmitted via food. There have been known cases where the handling of food has transmitted the disease. An instance would be meat workers that pass a piece of meat from one person to the next. other methods that have occurred are food delivered on a tray from an infected person to a quarantined person. What is more worrying I think is that while it has never really been said that it can spread "airbourne" as such it is clear that it has spread via central air conditioning units.Flash: "No evidence of contracting Covid-19 from food or food packaging". No surprise there, the virus' mythical survival skills outside the friendly confines of the body had already been debunked in the lab.
The spike in new cases is largely among younger people eschewing social distancing in bars and clubs. Picture typical "spring break" behavior. If my assessment proves out, I don't expect an equivalent spike in deaths, since the most vulnerable (elderly and infirm) are still locked down. If (!) hospitalizations and deaths can be contained, there's a perverse positive effect: inching toward herd immunity.
-
https://seekingalpha.com/news/35859...-40&utm_medium=email&utm_source=seeking_alpha
-
Yeah, wish this guy was leading the charge!!!!Yup. (Although sick people don't work much.) Just getting started. Plenty of room to grow. I wouldn't put much stock in anything coming out of De Santis's mouth. If it were all youngsters I doubt hospitalizations would be rising. Hopefully the death count doesn't turn up but it's very early days on that front. It almost certainly will but hopefully not as badly as NY did. The next 4-6 weeks are going to be interesting. Very good chance we beat NY's one day new confirmed case count record and add another trophy to the cupboard.
They've closed the beaches here again now (as well as bars) but I believe the marinas are still open. All good!
Arizona takes tenth place, nipping at Georgia's heals. The Carolina's head higher also.
Yeah, wish this guy was leading the charge!!!!
https://www.mygwork.com/en/my-g-news/andrew-gillum-linked-to-meth-overdose-of-gay-escort-incident
I don't need to define anything, it's in the CDC report:I think you may be misinformed about the virus being able to spread via food. Or at least the answer should be it depends on your definition of transmitted via food.
... it seems that covid is only about as deadly as the flu.
COVID-19 has an infection fatality rate 5-20 times higher than the seasonal flu, and in 5 months has already killed more Americans than any seasonal or pandemic influenza in the past century.
If you prefer to keep score by deaths as a percentage of population rather than as a raw number, the sentence above will be true by the end of this year.
More than 90% of the U.S. population is still susceptible to COVID-19, and in the U.S. R0 is going back up to its uncontrolled value of ~2.5 (~twice that of the seasonal flu). From the virus's point of view, things are just getting started in a target-rich environment.
I will win my bet easily.
B.S. on every number out to the Public. This Country doesn't have a clue nor do the people on this Forum what the true numbers actually are! This thread is very amusing to me. I'm in Florida, from P.B.C. and my wife is in the medical field.
Where Doomed!
I do prefer to. Of course 1918 (0.68% of population killed) happens to be outside the past century, so that leaves only 1967 (0.05%) and 1957 (0.07%). To be the deadliest in the past century will take 231,700 deaths, likely to become reality. But considering it'd be nearly an order of magnitude less devastating than 1918, a mean feat.COVID-19 has an infection fatality rate 5-20 times higher than the seasonal flu, and in 5 months has already killed more Americans than any seasonal or pandemic influenza in the past century.
If you prefer to keep score by deaths as a percentage of population rather than as a raw number, the sentence above will be true by the end of this year.
Per 100,000 the death rate is about the same as the common flu. As further testing occurs it continues to drop and may actually drop below that of the common flu.
The per 100,000 death rate can't fall. It can only go up. Unless JDS has a way of raising them from the dead...or a lot of children are born.