You could be like her!!! Yay!!!An intelligent individual cultivates his vices and enjoys them into old age. Only those gripped by fear and a desire to appease naysayers abandon the finer pleasures life has to offer.![]()
You could be like her!!! Yay!!!An intelligent individual cultivates his vices and enjoys them into old age. Only those gripped by fear and a desire to appease naysayers abandon the finer pleasures life has to offer.![]()
No, you are the freeloader the right tells me about!!
Come on Ron, you were doing ok without resorting to trolling
The numbers indicate that there was a significant difference in infection and death rates from enacting lockdowns versus not. But you knew that.
You could be like her!!! Yay!!!
I’ve been “retired” for 21 years and I’ll turn 63 in July.
That’s your right. Don’t believe the truth just keep drinking the government kool aidSorry, I’m not drinking what you’re selling
No government checks for me!
I'm 60, quit smokin and drinkin four years ago. I'm in my prime. I'll never retire and I'm gonna live forever. MikeI’ve been “retired” for 21 years and I’ll turn 63 in July.
I’ve been supporting the uneducated and underprivileged my entire life, you would just be another in a long line.
When all this started the experts said this was no big deal. Then they found out that China lied about the origin and its transmissibility, and that the WHO was unreliable.
The experts next move was puzzling, as they decided to accept worst case models that were wildly wrong vs considering that COVID-19 would probably be like other respiratory viruses.
Be that as it may, with all the uncertainty it made sense for the initial two week shutdown. Not that such a shutdown would reduce the number of cases but we needed to flatten the curve to avoid overwhelming medical capacity.
The big error has been as the actual data came in it showed the models used for the caseload assumption were hopelessly wrong and that we were in no danger of overwhelming medical capacity. At that point the shutdown should have started ending, though social distancing, protecting the vulnerable, and quarantining the sick should have continued. However, instead of opening up our experts and leaders decided to protect their position and double down on the necessity of shutdown.
As a consequence we have damaged our economy terribly. We have weakened our collective immune systems and even have had to furlough many in our medical profession.
The experts and our leaders will claim all this damage was necessary to save lives. They can only come to that conclusion if they assume the worst case scenario models were reality had we done nothing. They have to make this assumption or else they must admit they damaged us for nothing. Since there is no true way to tell what might have happened they will claim they were right and then dismiss any criticism by virtue-signaling about lives vs dollars.
The likely scenario was had we only done social distancing, quarantined the sick, and protected the vulnerable we would have seen a similar number of deaths without creating the disaster we have now. This was common sense before all this started.
Let's examine the facts:
Your contention: more people died from Covid than died from the flu in the recent decade.
Fact: 80,000 people died from the flu last year in the US. CDC report:
https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/
An intelligent individual cultivates his vices and enjoys them into old age. Only those gripped by fear and a desire to appease naysayers abandon the finer pleasures life has to offer.![]()
Disease burden of 'flu for the US for each of the last 9 seasons from the CDC itself:
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
Including 95% confidence intervals. We'll clock through all years' mean estimates by the end of the day today or tomorrow. And COVID will keep one rocking on. Despite the largest implementation of NPI we've seen in over 100 years, I think @Toby Bradshaw 's bet is looking good.
All the evidence from Europe and the UK (and we're running some weeks ahead of the US) is that most official figures understate Covid deaths. The key stats being used now in the UK are the ONS (Office of National Statistics) total weekly death figure compared to the five previous year average of the equivalent week. These figures are very accurate but take around 10 days to be collated and checked. W/e 17.04.20 has just been released and is a full 100% up over the average for the previous five years. That is around 10,000 more deaths than would be expected.
Some lack it entirely. Enjoy your $100 glasses of wine.![]()
Let's examine the facts:
Fact: Sweden did not lock down. They even kept schools open. Their infection rate and death rate per capita is on par with their neighbors who did lock down yet their economy is not going to suffer like the rest of Europe and the US.
Err facts... So Sweden has about double the population of Denmark, Finland or Norway. Yet Sweden has 2462 deaths versus 443, 206 and 207 for Denmark, Finland and Norway respectively. Pressure is growing for a change in strategy in Sweden.
Lower level of testing? Your claim that the population of Sweden has herd immunity is unsubstantiated.
The death rate in Sweden is currently 23% above historical averages