bozo699 said:
Stiles,
I am not sure what you mean? do you mean Concentricity gage or gauge? or do you mean total induced runout is the proper term that a machinist would use rather than concentric? The world is full of miss terminology, try calling sinclair Sinclair, Midway and ask for a TIR gauge they would have no idea what you were talking about but they could find a tool to measure the tir,....it's commonly called a Concentricity gauge

Wayne.
Yes I mean gage and gauge can be used interchangeably, both are correct, but guage is not correct (sorry OP I didn't start the semantic argument, I knew what you were talking about). I also mean that the measurements, TIR and concentricity are totally different measurements. Welcome to GD&T 101. For example concentricity ignores the most common type of cylindricity error, an oval shape, but TIR will indicate this type of form error.
I've have never heard total indicated runout or reading called "induced" not sure where you got that, maybe incuction has something to do with it hell i don't know. Maybe you can explain it to me? And you were talking about a world full of incorrect terminology?
I couldn't care less what some handloading companies call their wears, but I do care about what GD&T standards mean. After all if I don't know GD&T I can get caned for making scrap parts. When was the last time you had an $80k+ part on your table? Me? Yesterday. IJS.
Let me guess, your not a machinist.