Seems to help hold barrel heat down and lengthen times between cleanings.
Does he sell it?DennisH said:Only reason I ask, David Tubbs seems to believe in it!
Only reason I ask, David Tubbs seems to believe in it!
Does he sell it?
1shot said:My experience with the product is limited to a test that I did during a 3x600 match. I was shooting a 6.5x284 with 139 Scenars. Matches one and three were shot with “naked†bullets with #2 being coated with Hbn. There wasn’t a ¼ MOA difference between the three matches. I also did some load development with coated bullets, and the bare bullets chronoed the same velocities with identical powder charges. Given the extra steps involved in the application of the coating, I’ll stick with the bare bullets. BTW, this info is worth exactly what you paid for it, but I hope it helps,
Lloyd
Bob, interesting comment!If I didn't already have the equipment to coat bullets, I wouldn't go thru the trouble.
There is no substitute for laying down behind your rifle, watching conditions, and breaking the shot. Keep a logbook.
Remember that saying... It's not the arrow, but the Indian
Nomad47 said:"Friction proofing" bullets does result in a net loss in velocity. However, it also results in a greater loss in pressure. So with an increase in charge you can either have the same velocity with less pressure or more velocity with the same pressure.
QuickLoad backs up my statement.