• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Barrel Nut Disadvantages?

Whichever one of you monkeys that ends up testing this... It might be worth testing a load that ISN'T perfectly tuned for the gun and seeing what difference it makes? A lot of new shooters choose a nut barrel because they're new (not all, dont flame me) but their reloading skills might be limited and might be shooting factory ammo.
 
A couple of posters have mentioned the actual size of a barrel nut might present a problem.

Not particularly the length, but more the diameter. Too thin, the nut could distort, compromising the joint.
Too large, aesthetics become an issue.

Any thoughts on this?
 
Someone on here obviously does not want the test done. I hope Jackie gets it done and followed up with others. Most on here do not understand the level of precision or accuracy that Registered Competition demands. " Not world class but close enough" won't cut it in our disciplines.
 
Whichever one of you monkeys that ends up testing this... It might be worth testing a load that ISN'T perfectly tuned for the gun and seeing what difference it makes? A lot of new shooters choose a nut barrel because they're new (not all, dont flame me) but their reloading skills might be limited and might be shooting factory ammo.
When we do a test we always cover a lot of ground. We want to see how small they will shoot but also if the window was effected or how bad they shoot out of tune. This is particularly true when testing primers. Many times a couple of primers will shoot small, but one shoots a lot better when off tune.
 
A couple of posters have mentioned the actual size of a barrel nut might present a problem.

Not particularly the length, but more the diameter. Too thin, the nut could distort, compromising the joint.
Too large, aesthetics become an issue.

Any thoughts on this?
I looked at that bug nut bug holes is selling. They make them in 1/16-18tpi with an od of 1.300. I think that would be the way to go. I didnt see one with 1.125-16 threads for your M so you would need to make one up. I wouldnt worry about looks, Im sure you will design it to work well.
 
I'm going to be curious what barrel nut these tests will use.

When I was in the industry working as a mechanical engineer and later as a Six Sigma Black belt I dealt with production people and management people all the time who said that their data was good and it "proved" this or that. Many times you would have a company doing something because they did something 25 years ago a few times and then it just became gospel that that's how you're supposed to do it. Well that's what's going to happen if you do one test and it comes out. This thread will be returned to a thousand times as the defining moment in testing of this one subject. The day that the question was answered with the data point of one. Now written in the book forever as the defining answer for everyone else in the whole world.

Alex just said it these other tests have been performed literally hundreds of times in hundreds of rifles. Testing primers and powder and bullets for example. Repeated over and over and over again until the data rises to the top. But this test will only be a data point of one, and has no more validity than flipping a coin. But I do have a feeling it will just be referred to over and over and over again for decades as being the definite moment that set the record straight.
 
Last edited:
A couple of posters have mentioned the actual size of a barrel nut might present a problem.

Not particularly the length, but more the diameter. Too thin, the nut could distort, compromising the joint.
Too large, aesthetics become an issue.

Any thoughts on this?
Jackie, my approach is going to be an 1.250 O.D. round nut with two blind holes on the front face and a two pin style spanner wrench.

I sketched up a Tommy bar' style, too. But this could distort the nut when torqued aggressively.
 
I'm going to be curious what barrel nut these tests will use.

When I was in the industry working as a mechanical engineer and later as a Six Sigma Black belt I dealt with production people and management people all the time who said that their data was good and it "proved" this or that. Many times you would have a company doing something because they did something 25 years ago a few times and then it just became gospel that that's how you're supposed to do it. Well that's what's going to happen if you do one test and it comes out. This thread will be returned to a thousand times as the defining moment in testing of this one subject. The day that the question was answered with the data point of one. Now written in the book forever as the defining answer for everyone else in the whole world.

Alex just said it these other tests have been performed literally hundreds of times in hundreds of rifles. Testing primers and powder and bullets for example. Repeated over and over and over again until the data rises to the top. But this test will only be a data point of one, and has no more validity than flipping a coin. But I do have a feeling it will just be referred to over and over and over again for decades as being the definite moment that set the record straight.
No, actual results from hordes of Registered Competition aggregates will determine the optimum method.......it's the trait us Benchresters have been associated with for years
-once one guy wins with something new -others follow suit.
 
No, actual results from hordes of Registered Competition aggregates will determine the optimum method.......it's the trait us Benchresters have been associated with for years
-once one guy wins with something new -others follow suit.

Once again. Made my point.

Although, I would hate to think that benchresters are all just a bunch of followers. But you said it!
 
All joking aside... wouldn't that be the best way to test the differences? We already know barrel nuts will get the job done, no one is denying that. But this is a thread full of guys willing to split hairs and experiment.
To me this is ford vs Chevy, both have merits.
My two best barrels were 7mm brux with barrel nuts, amazing shooters that made me look like a competent but that’s just a barrel blank lottery win in my opinion.

I’ve burned out way more barrel nut barrels than shouldered barrels but I’m really liking shouldered now for the weight, ease of swapping and enjoyment of cutting them.

I’m interested to see test results and format it takes regardless
 
Once again. Made my point.

Although, I would hate to think that benchresters are all just a bunch of followers. But you said it!
All competitions are like that, silver bullet.
I used to see that a lot in fly casting competitions, people would spend a fortune on the hottest lines and rods instead of optimizing what they had and putting in the many hours of practice and then upsetting themselves with the new equipment.
 
I sincerely hope some testing comes of this. It appears several good people are willing to get involved and I'd like to see this come together.

This is an excellent thread. Very interesting ideas.
 
All competitions are like that, silver bullet.
I used to see that a lot in fly casting competitions, people would spend a fortune on the hottest lines and rods instead of optimizing what they had and putting in the many hours of practice and then upsetting themselves with the new equipment.

I know some some dominant competitors. They don't copy. They innovate. They don't give a flip what the other guy is using.
 
I sincerely hope some testing comes of this. It appears several good people are willing to get involved and I'd like to see this come together.

This is an excellent thread. Very interesting ideas.

I'm sorry I just don't see it like that.

There are like millions of nut barrels out there just working like a champ. And now there is this teeny tiny group of people that are going to set the record straight on this whole thing.

In fact, after posting here for many years it always seems to come down to this teeny group of people that must bless anything before it is considered valid. It's the ultimate snobbery. No matter what anyone is doing in the industry or competition outside this microscopic group, it is invalid until blessed by this group. On nearly every subject.
 
Last edited:
Once again. Made my point.

Although, I would hate to think that benchresters are all just a bunch of followers. But you said it!
No, actual results from hordes of Registered Competition aggregates WILL determine the optimum method.......it's the trait us Benchresters have been associated with for years
-once one guy wins with something new -others follow suit.
Future tense. I welcome more shooters at Registered Club matches. If this encourages more shooters with Savages or Remage's (?) or whatever to come out , I am 100 % for it.........even if it's factory class. If they do well it will encourage more to re-think the barrel attachment method.
 
I'm going to be curious what barrel nut these tests will use.
I just purchased one of your 1-1/16X18 Kelbly's/BAT nuts from your online store: urbanrifleman.com. Order #2213.

I'll A-B-A test your nut in addition to the one I make.

P.S. Your site shows pictures of both a black and natural nut. But when you purchase it, there's no option given to select the finish. Now, I don't care if comes lime green or competition orange. Some customers may.
 
Future tense. I welcome more shooters at Registered Club matches. If this encourages more shooters with Savages or Remage's (?) or whatever to come out , I am 100 % for it.........even if it's factory class. If they do well it will encourage more to re-think the barrel attachment method.

I have a bunch of customers shooting in matches. Most of my customers shoot in matches.

?????

Nut barrels are everywhere. For a long time. Some of the posts here seem to presume this is a new invention.
 
I just purchased one of your 1-1/16X18 Kelbly's/BAT nuts from your online store: urbanrifleman.com. Order #2213.

I'll A-B-A test your nut in addition to the one I make.

P.S. Your site shows pictures of both a black and natural nut. But when you purchase it, there's no option given to select the finish. Now, I don't care if comes lime green or competition orange. Some customers may.

That's the only one that only comes in black. They haven't made a run of that thread in years, because no one buys them. 18tpi threads are custom actions and people don't use nut barrels.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,856
Messages
2,204,344
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top