Bear with me, I may have some terms wrong here, but I will pass on what hours of reading has done to mold my understand and annealing practices.
Using 750 Templaq doesn't seem advantageous, but may even be foolish. I read on a lot of metallurgy pages that the key to annealing is keeping it to temperature for a certain period of time, which we cannot accomplish with the flame annealing machines because the flame has a propensity to go PAST the target if you try to maintain that temperature. Additionally, the Templaq only tells us the temperature on that portion of the case neck, be it inside or outside, but the whole will not be the same temperature. So essentially, Templaq tells us when we've crossed a line, but there is measurement for how far past that line and for how long.
The understanding is that the brass begins to cool as soon as its removed from the flame, if you heat up to 750, the temperature isn't maintained for full annealing, therefore we must "flash anneal," as it was referred to on one page, by bringing the brass to an even higher temperature for just a fraction of a second. For instance, perhaps 1200 degrees for 0.5s or 750 degrees for 3s (and these are numbers that are made up for demonstration purpose). I have a hard time doing this with a flame annealer as each piece of brass reacts differently and I have no way of measuring that temperature or time interval.
Essentially, without proper control and equipment which isn't available to the average handloader, annealing is an art. Being an art, scientific observation of Templaq can be disregarded. I've experimented with my results and I've found going to a dim glow in a low-lit room (not a dark room) is working well for my rifles' precision across the board. I do this every firing, POI doesn't seem to shift all over the place, nor does velocity. Some may believe I have "over-annealed", but I can find no evidence of that other than people's talk about "color" which is not a measurable scientific observation of the naked eye.