I have a question or two... First of all I am just a recreational shooter.. not interested in competitions. I am considering buying a Ruger Precision Rifle and am trying to decide if I should go with the 243 Win version or the 6.5 CM version.
My biggest concern is that the barrel life of the 243 Win would be significantly shorter than that of the 6.5 CM ... Is that valid?
I am leaning towards the 243 because I can get Lapua brass for it and it has less recoil therefore my wife might actually want to join me and try some shooting as well. I would probably reload with 100 gr or 105 grain pills... probably with Hornady A-Max most of the time. I am guessing that the price per round to reload would be less with the 243 as compared to the 6.5
I was told that the 6.5 can get 3000 rds of useful bbl life vs only 1200 rds with the 6mm.. Would you agree?
The 243 version has a 26 inch tube with a 1:7.7 inch rate of twist. Will that stabilized 105 grainers? see link below for specs
http://ruger.com/products/precisionRifle/specSheets/18010.html
My biggest concern is that the barrel life of the 243 Win would be significantly shorter than that of the 6.5 CM ... Is that valid?
I am leaning towards the 243 because I can get Lapua brass for it and it has less recoil therefore my wife might actually want to join me and try some shooting as well. I would probably reload with 100 gr or 105 grain pills... probably with Hornady A-Max most of the time. I am guessing that the price per round to reload would be less with the 243 as compared to the 6.5
I was told that the 6.5 can get 3000 rds of useful bbl life vs only 1200 rds with the 6mm.. Would you agree?
The 243 version has a 26 inch tube with a 1:7.7 inch rate of twist. Will that stabilized 105 grainers? see link below for specs
http://ruger.com/products/precisionRifle/specSheets/18010.html