• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

New to load development and suffering from information overload

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got lots to learn. But, here's what I can share...

I've tried the satterlee method when it was popular & it didn't pan out for me. As others have mentioned, when sample sizes are small, results are statistically insignificant (and therefore likely not repeatable). If you decide to increase sample sizes and do a velocity ladder with 4-5 cartridges per charge weight (CW), one might argue that you might as well be doing OCW.

There seem to be two major schools of thought for load development methodology. (1) OCW then fine tune seating depth, (2) seating depth tests at lowest book CW, then OCW at that optimal seating depth. I've done it both ways and gotten to the same place. I don't personally feel like either method is really faster or uses less components...unless you just get lucky and hit gold early.

My opinion is that OCW then seating depth is easier process to mentally manage. So, here's what I would suggest:

Find load data for a projectile and powder that puts you in your desired velocity range. Load 10 or so CW in that load data around that velocity. For 6.5CM, I would suggest incrementing CW in 0.2 gr steps. For lower case volumes (e.g. 223). I would suggest 0.1 gr increments. Initially seat projectiles at manufacturer recommended starting point or 0.020" off lands if you cant find manufacturer recommendation. Now go shoot and see what looks promising.

If you find something that makes you happy, load 0.1 gr CW increments on either side of it. Shoot it again.

If you find something that makes you happy (or happy-er) again, you can stay there...or see if you can tighten it by trying seating depths 0.003" on either side of your initial. You might decide to load just one on either side or a few. But, if going in a certain direction makes groups open, abandon that direction. If you do seating depth tests and find something that makes you happy-er, load that CW & seating depth and confirm it a couple of times. If you decide not to tune seating depth, confirm whichever CW you think you want to move forward with a couple of times.

In my opinion, now that you have a confirmed load(s) that make you happy...this is where a chronograph becomes important. Chrono your favorite load(s) and measure SD, ES, velocity. To me, this is just a confirmation step that your load is in a stable node and that any variation in velocity doesn't muck up your expectations of that load (e.g. longer ranges).

Hope that helps to clarify and outline a manageable process & hopefully didn't just tell you a bunch of stuff you already knew.
Good post. I appreciate the info and the time it took to reply. Thank you, sir.
 
I also try not to waste time.

First example is nosler ABLR.... notoriously hard to tune but the price was right i wanted to try them. I always start with a pressure ladder to see how they generally shoot and to find my max safe charge.

1000053695.jpg

Wide and spread out..... very bad.

Next is same rifle with 180 hybrids and 162 ELDM.... bullets notoriously easy to tune....

1000053698.jpg

Much more clumped together.... much better chance of finding an easy to shoot load.

If it doesn't start off fairly small I don't waste my time.
 
Anyway, I'm going to load some sighters up and then load five rounds at 40.5 and load in increments of .4 up to 43.3gr. (Accurate 4350) @ .020 from jam. So here's my question.... Do I look for a flat spot in velocity, a low ES, watch the groups for size/stringing or all of the above?

I thought I had it figured out on what I was going to do and the more I read/watch, the more I get confused. (Not hard for me to do)

Thanks

It looks to me like you have it figured out well enough. Don’t get too far into the details for now, or you will end up overwhelmed. Shoot your early testing groups at 100 yds and avoid windy conditions. Keep records of each group average velocity, es and sd. You probably don’t want to focus on the chronograph numbers now, but as you progress out to longer distances, they will become more important. Also, note the temperature for each session. The more data you gather now will make it easier when making future decisions.

Shoot the groups as you note and let the barrel cool between each group to ensure consistent barrel temperature. Make sure to pay close attention to high pressure signs for each group so you don’t exceed unsafe pressures. I pay close attention to a heavier bolt lift, primer cratering, primer flattening, and smearing shiny marks on the case head.

As has been previously mentioned, keep your scope settings constant for all of your groups. From your proposed powder load testing groups, compare the groups and hopefully you will find two or three consecutive groups where the centroid (center) of the group impacts the target at the same or similar location on the vertical axis. Don’t worry too much about group size and shape just yet, you can tighten that up later with seating depth testing.

You might want to conduct this testing multiple times and look for repeatability to help verify the best charge window. Once you are done with the initial powder load testing, you will be able to focus in on a load.

The next step will be to select a charge or two in the middle of the charges where the group centroids had the least vertical dispersion. From there you can perform seating depth testing.

Post some targets and you will get some helpful feedback from the forum members. Be patient, don’t expect to shoot quarter minute groups after an only few testing sessions, and remember to have fun!
 
Try do load development at 600 if possible. Even 300 will be at better than just 100.
ABSOLUTELY.
Testing for long range loads, 100 yd groups are close to worthless, except to sort out some really bad loads.
The next most worthless thing (In terms of giving you really worthwhile LR information) is 3 shot groups.

(Spoken from half a century on the bench. My experience; expect others to exactly disagree with me).
 
Last edited:
Forget about FPS flat spots, Forget about E.S as long as its below 30, charge weights in your application shout be .02 difference, I would watch Alex Wheelers methods on shoulder bump and how to find touch and start there with seating depth you could be skipping over a very good node starting at .020 off.
If 600 is your goal test atleast there with whatever you decide on for a load.
Test your seating depth .003 at a time you will be surprised at the difference especially at 600.
Lastly, trust your targets not numbers
 
Testing for long range loads, 100 yd groups are close to worthless
I disagree with this statement, I have had very good results at 600 yards tuning at 100 yards. If 100 yards is all you have to tune at, get those groups as small as you can get them and the ES as low as you can get them, this is what I have experienced if it groups at 100 it will group at 600 if you do your part driving the gun.
 
Last edited:
The more spikes closer is effected by the wind later. I always have time to watch the wind at longer ranges as well as shorter. The animal doesn’t know who’s watching them.
 
Last edited:
I want to thank everyone for taking the time to help get me and my thoughts lined out. I appreciate everyone's input. I've decided a plan of attack. Here's what it's going to look like.....

* 1st, I'm going to load up a few sighters/foulers and get it close

* 2nd, I'll load 4 rounds of each charge weight in increments of .3 ranging from 40.5 - 43.5. (more on the charge weights at the end of the post)

* 3rd, I'll shoot one of each charge weight at different points of aim in a straight line looking for pressure and observing POI. If pressure is found, back off a little and test groups up to that point.

* 4th, shoot the remaining three of each charge weight (up to pressure limit) at different points of aim, looking for POI and reading the groups. All groups shot over the chronograph recording the data.

With that info, I should be able to pick a charge weight. That'll wrap up one range session. The next time out, it'll be seating depth testing. On the third trip, it should be fine tuning of the charge weight. Sounds about right?

* On the charge weight, Hornady says a max charge of 41.2 (w/ a 140 BTHP). Berger says a max of 42.1 (w/ a 140 Elite Hunter) and Hodgdon says 43.5 (140 ELD-X). The reason I decided to start loading at 40.5 is, if I find pressure in the middle of that (somewhere in the low to mid 42's), it gives me 7 - 8 groups. If I don't find it until 43, that's 10 groups. If I find it where Hornady says, that'll make for a short range day. Lol. Two of them say starting load at 38 and one says 39.2. I don't have any idea where max would be with them ranging 2.3 grains as max. Being that I'm shooting 140 gr. BTHP's and my Accurate powder is Pre Hodgdon, should I load a few lower than 40.5?
 
Last edited:
I want to thank everyone for taking the time to help get me and my thoughts lined out. I appreciate everyone's input. I've decided a plan of attack. Here's what it's going to look like.....

* 1st, I'm going to load up a few sighters/foulers and get it close

* 2nd, I'll load 4 rounds of each charge weight in increments of .3 ranging from 40.5 - 43.5. (more on the charge weights at the end of the post)

* 3rd, I'll shoot one of each charge weight at different points of aim in a straight line looking for pressure and observing POI. If pressure is found, back off a little and test groups up to that point.

* 4th, shoot the remaining three of each charge weight (up to pressure limit) at different points of aim, looking for POI and reading the groups. All groups shot over the chronograph recording the data.

With that info, I should be able to pick a charge weight. That'll wrap up one range session. The next time out, it'll be seating depth testing. On the third trip, it should be fine tuning of the charge weight. Sounds about right?

* On the charge weight, Hornady says a max charge of 41.2 (w/ a 140 BTHP). Berger says a max of 42.1 (w/ a 140 Elite Hunter) and Hodgdon says 43.5 (140 ELD-X). The reason I decided to start loading at 40.5 is, if I find pressure in the middle of that (somewhere in the low to mid 42's), it gives me 7 - 8 groups. If I don't find it until 43, that's 10 groups. If I find it where Hornady says, that'll make for a short range day. Lol. Two of them say starting load at 38 and one says 39.2. I don't have any idea where max would be with them ranging 2.3 grains as max. Being that I'm shooting 140 gr. BTHP's and my Accurate powder is Pre Hodgdon, should I load a few lower than 40.5?
Sounds like you have a good, well thought out plan. You should be okay with 40.5 to begin with. You could load your sighters at the lower charge to see what the pressure signs look like on the low end. I tend to not use up components testing the extreme low end.
 
Here is my previous post continued...

-40 did in fact shoot the smallest, but again impact are all pretty much same spot in relation to dot. This is a hunting rifle.... I'm very satisfied with the result.

White dot is 0.75. I use center dot scopes and I like uncluttered targets....I can't shoot targets with grid marks all over them as well as a plain dot.

1000053857.jpg


Next is a pretty typical average hunting rifle.

Groups for me usually show wide and then tall and then wide again as you change charge or seating depth.

I like seeing triangles.

So in this rifle -60 to -80 appears to be where it will shoot the smallest....

1000053859.jpg
 
How about this… try not to buy to many components of various brands or types. I found out after many years not to go crazy buying everything other people told me they buy or “it’s an experiment” you just have to try it. That’s partly true but not to go beyond what “your rifle likes” or does the job, or equipment that loads it.

Lee collet neck sizer/Redding body die and a competition seater. I bought a forester comp seater used off ebay. No need to check concentricity, it’s fine. A Frankford arsenal coax press verses a forester coax is fine. I don’t size with the Frankford press, the shell holder is crap just seat. I bought a used Rcbs RC that is really nice to size.

Powder. I had a great load with 1 powder.. after careful research and switched for better temp stability.. even though the first one is just as good, and the second one is on hold for distribution. It’s easy to get caught up with try this it works well in my rifle. Sometimes it works well across the board but not usually. Bedding is always a way to say ,it’s not that l did bed it.
 
As I got older, I learned a few things. One of them is when a hobby because a source of frustration and stress, then it is time to step back and re-set one's attitude and approach.
I agree. That's the reason I don't work on my Chevelle any longer. It was turning into work and frustration.

I said "suffering" in the title, but it's far from it. There's no frustration with load development or reloading. I love it. I was just asking this to get all of the info bouncing around in my head straightened out and get a plan together.
 
Last edited:
women are multitaskers, men? Some are, I ain't, well it depends on what it is. Our lives are to easy. No kids, no mortage, no to do lists, etc.... I wouldn't bounce too much around in your head. That isn't good, to the point of buying and doing too much too soon. Don't waste components, time and money. Go for bedding the rifle/free float the barrel, a Body die, Lee collet die, and a used competition seater from Forster off ebay, and a VLD stem and form it to a good vld bullet. I use light valve lapping compound chucked in a drill. Take your time, and gradually work it. Their stems aren't hardened.
 
I suspect you don't need to over think it for the creedmoor. Maybe I just got lucky or maybe its the Bartlein barrel. I load 6 creed but I bet the same principle applies to 6.5. H4350, berger hybrid, smk, or eldm, back it up .010 to .020 off jam, send it. I also use once fired Hornady brass with good results. About a billion people have already done the load development for 6.5 creed, just copy them and you will be in the ball park.

I have done the full load development with 3 to 5 shot groups for powder and seating depth when I started loading. Now I am trying larger samples and bigger changes per Hornady. So far, their observations have been true for me. Many times in the past I thought I was on to something with a certain charge or seating depth. I would then load up 10 or more to confirm and it would all fall apart. Now shooting 25 shot samples with larger changes I find for example .5 gr in a 223 makes very little difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,856
Messages
2,223,958
Members
79,944
Latest member
GeorgeF
Back
Top