Parr the course with this dude.And crickets......![]()
Parr the course with this dude.And crickets......![]()
Theoretical engineer with no people skills, no experience, no budget.Parr the course with this dude.
My full review will be posted in mid August after nationals are completed.This review could just as easily have been written by the OP.
I am not saying it is however it lacks any verifiable information as to its source.
I am waiting for established Forum Members to post independent reviews without the "middle man".
Neither group is SUB MOA. Too funny.John,
I picked up ten of your bullets at the last Pensacola gun show. I was able to load and shoot them yesterday and wanted to share the results with you.
I shot two five shot groups from a Remington 700 .308 with a 24” 1/10 Kreiger barrel. Both groups were sub MOA as can be seen in the attached photo. The bullets were loaded in once fired Federal cases with 41.0 Grs of Hodgdon Benchmark powder using a Federal large rifle primer.
After talking with you at the show, I wasn’t expecting much in the way of accuracy because you had said you hadn’t had great results out of the .308 bullet. I find these groups acceptable and could probably be reduced with further testing.
View attachment 1572698
View attachment 1572699


I have those bullets and will include them in my testing.Hope you are not counting me in that number.
I bought 20 .... you were very gracious and sent 20 additional (so 40 in total).
Not long ago, I gave them away to someone I really don't know (that is the truth).
Not being a shooter. He stated he shoots 10,000 shots a year.Wow, some of you guys are embarrassing me to be part of the precision shooting community. You're acting like a pack of wolves or a lynch mob. I thought this thread was going to be more civil and it started out that way but then the mob jumped over and started up again. This man has an idea which may or may not be valid but not being a shooter and not really knowing any shooters he asked for help. I think if we went into his arena we would come off as poorly as he did. Give the man a break if you don't agree with his idea or don't want to help just ignore him. Obviously there are a few who will help him, good on them. I remember a few years ago when there was a violent discussion on center fire tuners. All the experts said they wouldn't work now half the line has tuners. Please back off and let it play out on it's own. Rant off
Why is that a surprise? I test lots of 100 at a time with about 10 warming rounds. For the last few years I've tested about twice a weekNot being a shooter. He stated he shoots 10,000 shots a year.
You are correct sir, I read that as more like laboratory type shooting rather than what most of us do. I guess that means you can reassemble and hang me along with himNot being a shooter. He stated he shoots 10,000 shots a year.
you admitted to not having "bench rest type rifles" to test with.Why is that a surprise? I test lots of 100 at a time with about 10 warming rounds. For the last few years I've tested about twice a week
110*2*50=11,000
I doubt I tested 50 weeks a year so I rounded down.
Just because I don't shoot LIKE YOU doesn't mean I don't shoot. Bullet development is just weird shooting.
Y'all act like lawyers in the forum. "YOU ADMITTED"!you admitted to not having "bench rest type rifles" to test with.
So, much of your testing is being done with sub par equipment, which will be difficult to determine any data with (is it the bullet or the rifle).
If you are in fact testing 10k bullets a year ... why is it so difficult for you to provide 'know shooters' here with 500 or 1k bullets for testing at the ranges you claim will make a difference ?
Researching and developing a sub MOA load at 100 yards generally takes more than a few bullets.
At the ranges you are suggesting your bullet will make a difference is generally A LOT more R&D for sub MOA.
Whether you shoot them yourself .... or someone else shoots them, the cost is the same to you (actually cheaper, no powder or primers).
Most of the shooters here are stand up guys and will/would provide you with honest feedback that you will not be able to obtain with your current equipment.
JMO
I have given away about 20 boxes so far. Just not to the loud voices that you are hearing.You will never sell any until someone shoots an impressive wallet group, sets a record or wins a match with them. Hits on your website, are a lot different than selling bullets and winning matches. I would love for your bullets to be the real deal, but we will never know cause you are afraid to loss the price of a box of bullets to prove your point. Can't see the forest for the trees.
Well, ... many of the guys here are into super accurate rifles. You know, like 1 hole groups at 100 and 200 yards. If your equipment IS different than theirs ... maybe you should drop the bullet idea and sell those super accurate rifles to them.Y'all act like lawyers in the forum. "YOU ADMITTED"!
No, my equipment is not sub par. It is just different from yours.
Yes, I spend a bunch of money on testing. That does not mean that I will give you bullets for free.
No, based upon your behavior on this forum (and several others I might add) I did not select you to be one of the initial testers. I have found several shooter and things are going well.
I really should send you several boxes as a thank you. Every time you and the other distractors show your ass on one of my posts the hits on my Aerospike.com website spike.
“Rolling Nowhere”Are we still stirring the pot or “Is it soup yet”
Have you offered to help?. I have, and so have others. We did not ask for free bullets or anything other than an opportunity to provide feedback that might be meaningful to the designer.Wow, some of you guys are embarrassing me to be part of the precision shooting community. You're acting like a pack of wolves or a lynch mob. I thought this thread was going to be more civil and it started out that way but then the mob jumped over and started up again. This man has an idea which may or may not be valid but not being a shooter and not really knowing any shooters he asked for help. I think if we went into his arena we would come off as poorly as he did. Give the man a break if you don't agree with his idea or don't want to help just ignore him. Obviously there are a few who will help him, good on them. I remember a few years ago when there was a violent discussion on center fire tuners. All the experts said they wouldn't work now half the line has tuners. Please back off and let it play out on it's own. Rant off
Those are the exact guys you need to test your bullets. If you can convince them you can convince anyone.Please don't assume that the loud or obnoxious voices you hear are the experts doing the testing. I have been doing my best to avoid them.
Really? What’s wrong with lawyers? You got something against them? Sounds like you could use a good one right about now with a fair amount of people skills.Y'all act like lawyers in the forum. "YOU ADMITTED"!
No, my equipment is not sub par. It is just different from yours.
Yes, I spend a bunch of money on testing. That does not mean that I will give you bullets for free.
No, based upon your behavior on this forum (and several others I might add) I did not select you to be one of the initial testers. I have found several shooter and things are going well.
I really should send you several boxes as a thank you. Every time you and the other distractors show your ass on one of my posts the hits on my Aerospike.com website
Pot calling the kettle black?loud or obnoxious
