Death rate is extremely low in Netherlands, most recent figure 4 deaths per day or 0.23 deaths per 1M population (7 day average.) The EU average is 0.18 deaths per 1M.I see the increase in "cases". if these are the young, then they are furthering herd immunity. Are the deaths in Netherlands starting to climb or not ??
About 3 weeks after the Sturgis Bike Rally ends, we'll begin to see the badass bikers start to fall ill and die. But Sturgis will have benefited from their money spent, and taxes collected and that's the most important part. Sturgis residents will then be subjected to widespread testing to gather data about spread. Meanwhile the superspreaders and their victims will have taken the virus home with them.
I'll be giving wide berth to any bikers I see.
Wanna bet?About 3 weeks after the Sturgis Bike Rally ends, we'll begin to see the badass bikers start to fall ill and die.
No takers, huh? Come on, you closet MENSA members. Your chance to shine!The Kansas Secretary of the Department Health created a chart intended to show the effectiveness of masks, and to indicate that mask-wearing counties have been considerably safer than non-mask-wearing counties.
...
Exercise for the reader: How many times safer are mask than non-mask counties?
-
Looks like masks are 16/100,000 vs non-mask’s are 9/100,000. Tricky!No takers, huh? Come on, you closet MENSA members. Your chance to shine!
-
Deliberately designed to be misleading.No takers, huh? Come on, you closet MENSA members. Your chance to shine!
-
The Kansas Secretary of the Department Health created a chart intended to show the effectiveness of masks, and to indicate that mask-wearing counties have been considerably safer than non-mask-wearing counties.
View attachment 1196121
Exercise for the reader: How many times safer are mask than non-mask counties?
-
No takers, huh? Come on, you closet MENSA members. Your chance to shine!
-
Wow... so they intentionally created a chart with different Y axis range scales to make it look like the “Non Mask” counties are experiencing higher rates! Sad, very sad...
Ding! Ding! Ding! Winner! Winner! Chicken Dinner!Looks like masks are 16/100,000 vs non-mask’s are 9/100,000. Tricky!
Preaching to the choir. Try these folks:Why not just make the Y axis 0-1000?
I suppose it doesn’t raise any questions in your mind that almost 100% of that reduction can be isolated to just 3 of the total 22 days shown??????Why not just make the Y axis 0-1000?
No mask: from 10->9 (at best) over the period. 10% improvement.
Mask: from 25 -> 16 over the period. 36% improvement.
No mask vs with mask??
I can't remember the exact number, but according to CNN, I thinks it's something like a bazillion times safer with a mask. jd