Brians356
Gold $$ Contributor
Who? How many? Where?And people running around with placards arguing we should "sacrifice the weak."
-
Who? How many? Where?And people running around with placards arguing we should "sacrifice the weak."
I still haven't seen this healthy crisisWe are learning that in a health crisis there are many who are "weak" - more correctly, vulnerable. Vulnerable segments of the population (old, black, fat and other complicating conditions etc). Vulnerable jobs - jobs with little security, no support, no sick pay and 'gone in the flashest of flashes'. Vulnerable businesses - inability to adapt, over-leveraged, no capital buffers, poor supply chains etc. And people running around with placards arguing we should "sacrifice the weak." Yup they're being sacrificed. Never let a crisis go to waste.
Now we are told that the majority of people in the US want the federal military to stop the riots.
"The architect of Sweden’s controversial lighter lockdown policy for dealing with coronavirus has for the first time conceded the Scandinavian country should have imposed more restrictions to avoid having such a high death toll.
Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s state epidemiologist, agreed with the interviewer on Sveriges Radio that too many people had died in the country.
“If we would encounter the same disease, with exactly what we know about it today, I think we would land midway between what Sweden did and what the rest of the world did,” said Mr Tegnell in the interview broadcast on Wednesday morning." FT
Unfortunately you don't get to make decisions with hindsight
Thank goodness there are real independent medical professionals and scientists out there that don’t let their objectivity and ethics get tainted by political beliefs. I think this quote sums op the situation quite well.So it looks like peer reviews of one particular aspect of treatment are starting and the results are turning out to be quite controversial.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling
No need for the military just let the police do their job!
Story from Bloomberg 30 minutes ago:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...by-trump-provides-no-protection-from-covid-19
discusses "latest and most definitive study" on hydroxychloroquine and COVID. David Boulware, senior author of study/paper: "For post exposure prevention, this is pretty conclusive evidence that this doesn't work." Paper published in New England Journal of Medicine. I looked but don't see it on their website.
Story from Bloomberg 30 minutes ago:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...by-trump-provides-no-protection-from-covid-19
discusses "latest and most definitive study" on hydroxychloroquine and COVID. David Boulware, senior author of study/paper: "For post exposure prevention, this is pretty conclusive evidence that this doesn't work." Paper published in New England Journal of Medicine. I looked but don't see it on their website.
Story from Bloomberg 30 minutes ago:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...by-trump-provides-no-protection-from-covid-19
discusses "latest and most definitive study" on hydroxychloroquine and COVID. David Boulware, senior author of study/paper: "For post exposure prevention, this is pretty conclusive evidence that this doesn't work." Paper published in New England Journal of Medicine. I looked but don't see it on their website.
Thank goodness there are real independent medical professionals and scientists out there that don’t let their objectivity and ethics get tainted by political beliefs. I think this quote sums op the situation quite well.
“Chaccour says both NEJM and The Lancet should have scrutinized the provenance of Surgisphere’s data more closely before publishing the studies. “Here we are in the middle of a pandemic with hundreds of thousands of deaths, and the two most prestigious medical journals have failed us,” he says.”
I guess your definition of “conclusive” is different than his. Of course he is a doctor and you are.....?Story from Bloomberg 30 minutes ago:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...by-trump-provides-no-protection-from-covid-19
discusses "latest and most definitive study" on hydroxychloroquine and COVID. David Boulware, senior author of study/paper: "For post exposure prevention, this is pretty conclusive evidence that this doesn't work." Paper published in New England Journal of Medicine. I looked but don't see it on their website.