I keep wondering why antibody testing has any significance at all given that the WHO (apparently the gold standard health organization run by certified 3rd World medical system rejects) says there is absolutely no evidence such testing has any benefit!!!Yes of course. I went on to say
My point was that swab testing has been minimal let alone antibody testing.
The UK now, finally, feels they can source a reliable antibody test via Roche. I wonder how long it will take for the US to roll out general public antibody testing in scale.
That CNN headline said (back on 25 April) "WHO says no evidence shows that having coronavirus prevents a second infection." Fair enough. However, there was also no evidence showing that having coronavirus does not prevent a second infection.I keep wondering why antibody testing has any significance at all given that the WHO (apparently the gold standard health organization run by apparent 3rd World medical system rejects) says there is absolutely no evidence such testing has any benefit!!!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...s/who-immunity-antibodies-covid-19/index.html
And what is the purpose of that goal if in the end it’s meaningless?? Seems pretty easy to determine if antibodies confer future immunity.That CNN headline said (back on 25 April) "WHO says no evidence shows that having coronavirus prevents a second infection." Fair enough. However, there was also no evidence showing that having coronavirus does not prevent a second infection.
What the headline should have said (but wouldn't have been panic-inducing enough for CNN) was "Post-infection Immunity Still Uncertain".
But to the real point of your statement "there is absolutely no evidence such testing has any benefit": The main goal of antibody testing is to determine what percentage of the population have been exposed to the virus.
-
I just want to know when this went from “flatting the curve” while this thing ran its course to saving every possible life by crushing the economy while we wait for a cure!!
People die from a lot of unpreventable things every day all over the world and we don’t live in fear. I’ll be cautious, but I won’t live in fear over this virus either. It’s time to get things moving again!!!!
According to Minnesota's published data, the median age of Covid-19 decedents is 83 years. 80% of all deaths in MN had been in long-term care facilities. Combining those LTCF deaths and decedents who had co-morbidities, the total is 99.2%. That's not a typo.I've been working from home since this thing kicked off, and mainly binge watch Fox News. Throw in Outdoor Channel for some nice hunting/shooting shows.
While we don't want unknown carriers infecting others, and elderly/people with underlying conditions are at a much higher risk, overall, young and middle age folks seem to be at very low risk of major symptoms and/or death.
Everything in life is a risk and a reward. And we weigh those every time we do something.
If every single life must be saved for everything in the world that could kill us, lets stop driving automobiles. Stop having trucks, trains, airplanes move commodities and people. Shut down all factories and industrialization.
We can go back to the stone age (and a huge number of people will die of starvation as we do that).
Or we can use common sense.
Most of us in a work setting of any kind (including shoulder to shoulder in a meat packing plant/manufacturing, etc) will live, even if exposed. The Sioux Falls SD pork plant is 60 miles from me. Hundreds of employees were infected. I know 2 died, don't know if there were more. One was retirement age and the TV pic showed very heavy/obese. Two strikes for him, and the virus took his life. Plant not fully operational yet (may be closed, I'm not sure) SD Governor said weeks ago the Feds will decide when it opens. Geeze, that will take forever.
81% of the Minnesota deaths were in nursing homes. I think it was 60%+ in NY.
Lets use common sense, let the CDC, big gov't tell us the risks and mitigation techniques (not mandatory procedures), but let us get on with a life worth living.
There are two main points to everything being done, economic shutdown, social isolating, testing, etc.
1 The disease is being spread by those who are infected, contagious but asymptomatic or presymptomatic. The "super spreaders" are the 20 to 29 year olds who typically are asymptomatic and fearless so they are predisposed to gather in large groups and party, ignoring social distancing guidelines and refusing to wear masks. Compounding the situation is that apparently, refusing to wear a mask has also become a political ideology.
2 So far only about 3 percent of the population has been infected, as confirmed by active infection based tests. This number will surely rise as post infection tests confirm asymptomatic but recovered cases, but whatever the current actual case count is, the other 90+ percent of the populations is still vulnerable until widespread inoculation becomes available. If we overtax the hospitals by carelessly spreading the disease, a lot more of us will die rather than recover from an infection, and in so doing possibly take a few hospital workers with us.
Whereas it takes but a few seconds to make an N95 mask, it takes years to make a Nurse or Doctor.
This website allows the user to look at various aspects of the pandemic. Tabs at the top allow filters and present information in clear context.https://coronavirusgraphs.com/?c=cd&y=linear&t=bar_cumulative&f=0&ct=&co=2
No matter how you look at it, we're still seeing 20,000 to 25,000 new cases every day for the last 7 weeks. There has been no significant decline in the spread to warrant loosening of restrictions, and worse, the forecast model is showing a significant upward trend. The mathematical models that were much maligned in weeks past have been much more right than wrong. There's no reason to doubt them out of hand now.
We're in this for the long haul, and as Hans Solo said in Star Wars, "don't get cocky, kid", if we're overconfident in opening up the economy now, we'll risk getting slaughtered later.
For now, all we can do is to be smart, wash hands frequently, wear a mask, and stay away from large groups.
If Covid-19 was not killing anyone, no sane person would think a lockdown necessary, and few people would even know what the term "Covid-19" refers to. With that in mind, show me one model's prediction WRT deaths under strict social distancing ("lockdown") conditions, that was much more right than wrong.The mathematical models that were much maligned in weeks past have been much more right than wrong.
Deaths are what count. The common cold viruses are also coronaviruses. Nearly every one of the billions of humans on Earth are infected with a common cold virus, on average 2 or 3 times per year (children even more frequently). Yet deaths are so rare that there's no reason to spend time and $$ trying to "cure" or create vaccines against those coronaviruses.No matter how you look at it, we're still seeing 20,000 to 25,000 new cases every day for the last 7 weeks. There has been no significant decline in the spread to warrant loosening of restrictions, and worse, the forecast model is showing a significant upward trend. The mathematical models that were much maligned in weeks past have been much more right than wrong. There's no reason to doubt them out of hand now.
...But Covid-19 is still not much deadlier than a typical "bad" flu season.
Rounding up from Worldometer's 91,000? Fair enough. I said "not much deadlier". Also fair enough?The highest yearly death count for seasonal flu in the past decade in the U.S. is estimated to be 61,000. By the end of May COVID-19 will have killed around 100,000 Americans in two months.