Albany Mountain
Silver $$ Contributor
This is the first I ever heard of this. And would say that eliminating sling shooters is a real kick in the pants in that most (if not all) ranges that F class is shot on, were funded and built by the sling shooters. I guess I would need an explanation of what additional experience is needed to officiate and operate a F class match to include sling shooters.It depends on how much help I have and whether the help provides the ability to properly officiate those events according to the established rules. I don't think any match director should plan events that cannot be properly officiated. There is a lot more to it than "hanging targets." A lot of facilities have separated their F-Class matches from the traditional high power disciplines. Since AR Tactical is a new and rapidly growing discipline, I expect there would be a lot of demand. But being new, there would likely also be some grace during the provisional period as directors come up the learning curve to support it.
I expect in most places there will be much more demand and growth for F-Class and Tactical AR than for the traditional high power classes. If demand were to emerge, I think a match director focused on F-Class and Tactical AR would need help from more experienced shooters, or would do well to leave those disciplines to directors experienced with them. "Mission creep" can torpedo lots of good ideas that depend on volunteer labor when the volunteers lack the required experience to carry out the added mission elements.