VV equivalent to Varget

[sandwarrior]

Don’t mean to jack the thread, but dear lord, N140 is $100 cheaper than Varget??? I had no idea. Thanks!

Is it as temp stable as varget?

That's the kicker, NO.

 

[eddief]

N150 is Very close to Varget. Don't trust the burn rate charts for it. In my experience, it was basically the same in 6BR and Dasher.

 

[Bc'z]

All I can say is I'm thankful I have enough N140 for another 3000 rounds, because after this thread and Hodgedon's high prices I'm feeling like it might become the new unobtainable powder. Lol

 

[tominboise]

Has anyone used N140 in the M1 Garand, with 150gr FMJ and/or 168gr HPBT? It seems to be in the burn range that would work well in that platform.

 

[SeabeeKen]

Been buying up VV for several months after Hodgdon dropped the enduron line and I dropped Hodgdon. Put in a good supply of most of them and been having great results. N-140, N-540, and N-150 cover most of what I have. N-133 covers my 223 loads very well. Threw Hodgdon out of my powder cabinet permanently. I'm good on powder for many years to come

 

[JFrank]

Which VV powder is the closest to H 4895 ?

 

[memilanuk]

I'd say N135 and N140 probably straddle it, kind of like N140 and N150 straddle Varget. It'll vary a little depending on specific lots, etc.

 

[JFrank]

I'd say N135 and N140 probably straddle it, kind of like N140 and N150 straddle Varget. It'll vary a little depending on specific lots, etc.

Those and I was wondering about N530 , I suppose if I saw some I’d grab it to test.

 

[memilanuk]

Can't say I've ever heard of anyone using that one... N540, N550, sure.

 

[Laurie]

Which VV powder is the closest to H 4895 ?

Monte (@memilanuk ) has it right - it's straddled by N135 and N140. Again. don't believe burn rate charts where N135 is shown as 'slower' than H4895, even 'slower' than VarGet in some charts.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3934

for a range test in 223 Rem vs H4895. Note comments on N135's low bulk density / high fill-ratios, burn rate, and how far out QuickLOAD v.3.9 predictions are for QL users.

Those and I was wondering about N530 , I suppose if I saw some I’d grab it to test.

Viht N530 is a strange powder with by Viht powder standards a very restricted range of applications. I've only rarely seen it work well in any of them. In bulk form, it was Viht's original powder for factory 55gn M193 5.56mm military equivalents. Viht has discontinued this grade, and few will miss it.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3956

 

[boltfluter]

Thanks guys for the VV education. I had no idea this would be such a spirited topic. Guess I am not the only one tired of the price gouging going on. I have used VV133 in my .22 Waldog with fantastic results. Off to test more of the offerings. Thanks again for the hard earned info, much appreciated!
Paul

 

[Mulligan]

Monte (@memilanuk ) has it right - it's straddled by N135 and N140. Again. don't believe burn rate charts where N135 is shown as 'slower' than H4895, even 'slower' than VarGet in some charts.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3934

for a range test in 223 Rem vs H4895. Note comments on N135's low bulk density / high fill-ratios, burn rate, and how far out QuickLOAD v.3.9 predictions are for QL users.



Viht N530 is a strange powder with by Viht powder standards a very restricted range of applications. I've only rarely seen it work well in any of them. In bulk form, it was Viht's original powder for factory 55gn M193 5.56mm military equivalents. Viht has discontinued this grade, and few will miss it.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3956

Laurie,
I have ran several tests with N-150 and N-165 in my dashers. 150 has several nodes with the 103-105 class Bullets from slow to formula 1. N-165 is way slower, but accurate. I have not tried N -160 yet, is it closer to 150 or 165?

CW

 

[SeabeeKen]

I have a 8# of N-530 but havent done much testing with it as N-133 has performed great in my 223. As Laurie said, it was discontinued as was tin star (n-32c)

 

[SmokinJoe]

I've ran varget in my 204r for ever now and have been curious as to N140 or maybe N130.

Had good luck in the 204R with N530.

 

[Mulligan]

I seen several shops had a new run of 530 a couple of months ago. Did production start up again or did they find a pile of it in a warehouse somewhere?
CW

 

[Kracken McGraw]

Guess I am not the only one tired of the price gouging going on.

I’ve got a jug of Accurate 4064 to try with 105 type bullets in the 6br sometime because of this.

 

[marchx]

N140 is what I am using in BR and f-class for my 105s. Was considering N135 but the slight speed increase is not worth extra pressure.

 

[JFrank]

Monte (@memilanuk ) has it right - it's straddled by N135 and N140. Again. don't believe burn rate charts where N135 is shown as 'slower' than H4895, even 'slower' than VarGet in some charts.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3934

for a range test in 223 Rem vs H4895. Note comments on N135's low bulk density / high fill-ratios, burn rate, and how far out QuickLOAD v.3.9 predictions are for QL users.



Viht N530 is a strange powder with by Viht powder standards a very restricted range of applications. I've only rarely seen it work well in any of them. In bulk form, it was Viht's original powder for factory 55gn M193 5.56mm military equivalents. Viht has discontinued this grade, and few will miss it.

http://www.targetshooter.co.uk/?p=3956

Excellent articles, thank you

 

[ridgeway]

Accurate Arms 2495 has show very promising results in 6BRA...

 

[rebs]

which VV powder do you recommend for a 223 shooting 69, 77 and 80 grain bullets