• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

True Bore Alignment System

Over the last +11 years, I have had SSG chamber & crown 9 barrels, all of which were done in his True-Bore Alignment System on Haas TL1 CNC Lathes. The simplicity of the his system and stress free manor the system holds the work, makes so much sense to me, which leaves a lasting impression of perfection in my mind.

I have been privileged and blessed over the last +23 years to have several great gunsmiths do barrels for me, and have been honored to watch them perform their arts.
I've had barrels that were done in a "steady rest", some that were done through the spindle bore "rotationally", some that were done "adjusted outward with a spider", and these that were done in the True-Bore Alignment System.

I have seen excellent accuracy come from all these setups of chamber/fitting and believe all their arts are to be commended!!!
I am not saying one way or the other will produce more raw accuracy, but am saying the TBASystem is the most practical and stress free setup I have seen to holding and dialing in a barrel.

To emphasize on what I've seen while their, I will describe the process Nate used on the barrels:
After dialing the barrel in to less then 1/2 of 10-thousands across the 4" of his SSG range rods, he then puts a dial-indicator in the bore (near the proposed throat area) and again the indicator read less then 1/2 of 10-thousands. All adjustments were done to the TBASystem, none to the chuck.

Next the CNC cuts the threads and tenon. In that operation I've seen on the screen it's being done at around 950-RPM. Then the recess are cut, chamfers made, and chamber boring is done, again at similar speeds (a little less then 1000-rpm).
After these operations are complete, he re-inserts the SSG range rod and the indicator repeats to less then 1/2 of 10-thousands across the 4" rod, after which he again puts into the bores the indicator that repeats spot on the same as from the start.

The chambers I have watched him ream, resulted the same as the fittings, with 100% repeatable indicator readings to all the areas of the chamber that he reached for with the indicator stand.
From start to finish, I seen no movement of the parts being held, as proven by the before & after indicator readings. A very lasting impression to say the least !!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
Just my own curiosity... anyone have pictures of the TBAS taken apart? I'm interested in how the coaxial alignment works between the two main "plates" of the system.
Just had mine apart yesterday to clean everything, the ductile iron plate (front) has a radius (ball) and the alloy steel side has a female socket. There used to be a video 10 years ago where Nate showed how good they mesh together, not sure if it’s still around or not.
 
Last edited:
It works in a similar manner as the faceplates we use on our 4th axis rotary tables in Haas vertical mills. The plate, about 1" thick, bolts to the face of the 4th axis, then the chuck is bolted to the plate. The plate has a register that fits inside the backside of the chuck. The chuck has allen screws that you adjust in or out to center against the register on the faceplate. With a precision Thompson bar in the chuck to indicate, you can adjust the run out of the chuck down to well below .0005" if you have the time to do so.
 
Last edited:
What is the issue with the muzzel end that requires tapered bushings and why is it any different from chucking a tapered muzzle in a four jaw chuck?
 
What is the issue with the muzzel end that requires tapered bushings and why is it any different from chucking a tapered muzzle in a four jaw chuck?
Most barrels are tapered, all the pivoting tKes place in the TBAS, the Barrel is held still in the jaws. If a sleeve was not used, then the jaws would only grip a .030 or so of the barrel and it would wobble around. I actually just finished a barrel with mine today, maybe this pic will be worth more than words.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1212.jpeg
    IMG_1212.jpeg
    371.7 KB · Views: 138
I invested in the True Bore because my lathe’s primary use is not chambering barrels. It’s headstock is long and does not allow the use of more common practices like inboard/outboard spiders.

I thought the system had nice features, the primary being the ability to hold a barrel or action without inducing stresses by way of a 6 jaw chuck. I’ve used mine now for almost 10 years without any issues.

When I first started off I overcame holding the barrel taper by the same ways already mentioned, bushings. After making a hand full of those I decided I wasn’t gonna continue down that path so I made jaws that swivel to match any taper. I combined that with a tennon extension so I can support the outboard end.

Minus the weight (66 lbs with D1-6 back plate) I am still very happy I invested in it.

View attachment 1462802
Love it! Very nice work and great thinking on those jaws. That's how my brain works. If I can think of a way to make a tool within my means that will allow me to accomplish a task easier or with more precision, I'll just make it.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,518
Messages
2,197,791
Members
78,961
Latest member
Nicklm
Back
Top