I've always thought benchrest group agg's were the average size of a few or several groups shot; not the size of a circle encompassing all shots fired. Which means to me, an agg of 2.8 inches would include at least one group larger than 2.8". And the more groups shot in the agg, the more will be larger than their average size.johara1 said:Erik, I don't post pics. but draw a circle 2.8" and put 20 dots in it….....jim
It might do just that. As long as the sum of all group's sizes all add up to a number divided by the agg's size equals the number of groups fired. If the agg's 3 inches after 5 groups are fired, the sum of 15 inches divided by 3 equals 5. Firing 10 groups would need a total of all groups' sizes to equal 30 so when divided by 10 the agg would stay at 3. Shooting 20 groups need their size total to equal 60 inches to still average 3 inches. I don't think it matters if there's an equal number of both larger and smaller groups.Viewing it from that perspective (red above), regarding the AVERAGE: recording more groups, while maintaining the average, should also produce an equal number of SMALLER groups.
Well then, kudos to you with that record.johara1 said:Bart, This is what i shot for a new 1000 yd. IBS. record with a Dasher…. 4.262, 2.839, 3.715, 2.996, 2.433 and 2.188. . . . .
I think he's the Greg Conners that was on the 1988 US Palma Team with me.johara1 said:Bart, I saw SSGT. Conners shoot 35V's at 1000 yds. at inter service at Lackland AFB. with a gas gun and they called it on kind of darkness.