I know... I hate him... lol
I don't hate either one of them...if they help to save me some of the time and money I have already wasted testing for why a rifle wont shoot I'll kiss the SOB's if I ever do meet them!!!!
I know... I hate him... lol
What would be most helpful is an opthamologists report on the vision quality of the user.
EVERYTHING that relates to sight picture, involving a telescopic sight is Objective. Only YOUR Vision matters. Buy "the best scope" going according to "tests" and it's only as good as your eyes...
Loved the recent remarks cited by members here, how NF rep said their "scope tubes are all made on state of the art CNC machinery".... Like duh... only thing "state of the art" about CNC is the controller and software and machining a 30/36mm tube to ID perfection is not rocket science.... Buzzword Bat Scatt.... Like the NF rep who said NF has a "scope tester"... LOL Forever! A "scope tester" Is the NF customer a simpleton? Must be if the NF rep don't know how they "test" or what "tests" they run???
How's your vision? Best scope in the world won't improve it, but at least it won't diminish your ability.
The only "test" or "test eqpt" that matters is your eyesight and your possessing enough inteligence to prove your chosen gear works satisfactorily for you...
If you think you have to spend over $2000 to get superb optical performance, you are just wrong.
I can't wait to get one now and just as worried all of my scopes will have issue..
The highest dollar scope I have is a 1,000 dollar Leupold.
Anyone test any leupolds yet? You could pm me if unwilling to post on this thread.
FWIW, I don't have a scope checker yet, but as soon as somebody says "your checker is ready" I will. I currently have a Leupold Mark 4 M1 that has been my "go to" scope to check rifles and to rule out other scopes. I've had this one for quite a while and it has always held zero. Kind of been my "de facto" scope checker all this time. I don't know if Leupold does something different with the turrets or erector tube in the Mark 4's , but the ones I have had never had trouble holding zero.
This whole scope checker thing is kind of like a borescope...you want to see it for yourself, but then sometimes you don't want to know...like the joke about the wife that died and left her husband $1000 and an ear of corn...
she left him a note to look in the trunk up in the attic. He finds $1000 and an ear of corn. He figured she saved her spare change the entire marriage, but could not figure out the ear. He finally passed away and meets her in the after life. He asked about the ear of corn and she said "you don't want to know" but he insist. She tells him that every time she cheated she put an ear of corn in the trunk. At first he was mad but then figures "once in all those years isn't too bad, what about the $1000????" She said, "I got about $7.00 a bushel for the corn!!!!"
Every scope I own will test bad!!!!!!!
I don't know if the Leupold Mark 4 has anything better than the other brands but I had one take a dump on me a couple weeks ago on a rifle at work.
The initial testing has prove to me that everything must be proven and verified.
Rich
Id love to test the leupold 7-42 if someone wants to send one out....
I am surprised to hear that...I guess anything can go bad. I just always stuck to the Mark 4 fixed 10X because back in the late 80's early 90's that was the scope everyone was using on all the then new 50 cal bmg bolt guns. I figured if it would hold zero on a 50 cal it should work for my 308. It was also one of the first scopes you could get with mil-dots. Premier Reticles put the mil dot reticle in them.
Let me ask this...is there a particular scope that:
A. Is easy or easier than others to lock up solid for use as a test base??? and
B. Don't cost too terrible much money???
....we don't need the thing to be made with Schott glass a 34mm tube and special coatings for testing.
You could make a bunch of money if you could figure it out. I got one but I believe it is rock solid. I have it on a heavygun and the gun tracks. MattI wish someone would come up with a way to install a posi loc in a comp scope. The glass is so excellent, if we could lock them down they would be perfect. HINT! If it doesnt happen I may just have to try it myself eventually.
They have....a long time ago. Scroll down the page to the next to the last item.I wish someone would come up with a way to install a posi loc in a comp scope. The glass is so excellent, if we could lock them down they would be perfect. HINT! If it doesnt happen I may just have to try it myself eventually.
In the past I have seen an article that featured xrays of several different scopes. It would be interesting to see what xrays of the 15-55 would show in the area of the turrets. I forget, does that scope have a coil spring and plunger that serves to oppose the turrets? If it does, a modification of that feature might get you where you want to go without drilling any new holes.Boyd, I meant I want someone other than me to drill into the side of a NF comp 15x55 scope and install a posi-loc screw. Then we would have the scope we all want.
They dont have the exposed coil spring on this one. I asked Cecil Tucker if he would be willing to look at them maybe 6 months or longer ago. He declined. Cant blame him.In the past I have seen an article that featured xrays of several different scopes. It would be interesting to see what xrays of the 15-55 would show in the area of the turrets. I forget, does that scope have a coil spring and plunger that serves to oppose the turrets? If it does, a modification of that feature might get you where you want to go without drilling any new holes.