• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Roy Hunter stocks

Ya theres different methods. If you notice, you can see the grain still in the stock. Its not clear with flattener added. Which I wont even do anymore. It has to be left as sprayed and cant be touched up. If a guy leaves a gun loose in a case it buffs it up in spots. I definately dont like a matte or satin clear on a gun stock. Im not sure what Roys doing but I know its not clearcoat.
The way I've done them in the past has always turned out good. I'm guessing I avoid what you describe because I only use the satin for the last coat. I can certainly understand it hiding what's underneath if you build it up with a flattened clear. I just would never do that over a nice piece of wood. Grain shows wonderfully. In fact, better than a high gloss. All that shine is nice and some prefer it but that shine actually takes away from the figure that's underneath. Again, so much of this can be done differently and that likely explains why we have different experience with it and the end result. Not that either is right or wrong, just different. Most people want a high gloss to ooh and ahh over and I get that too but a satin lets the grain show through as you're eyes aren't as full of glare...for lack of a better way to put it. It's a trick that's been done like that for years with other finishes for that reason, though, to show the features of a nice piece of wood. Ultimately, it's about personal preference more than anything.
 
The way I've done them in the past has always turned out good. I'm guessing I avoid what you describe because I only use the satin for the last coat. I can certainly understand it hiding what's underneath if you build it up with a flattened clear. I just would never do that over a nice piece of wood. Grain shows wonderfully. In fact, better than a high gloss. All that shine is nice and some prefer it but that shine actually takes away from the figure that's underneath. Again, so much of this can be done differently and that likely explains why we have different experience with it and the end result. Not that either is right or wrong, just different. Most people want a high gloss to ooh and ahh over and I get that too but a satin lets the grain show through as you're eyes aren't as full of glare...for lack of a better way to put it. It's a trick that's been done like that for years with other finishes for that reason, though, to show the features of a nice piece of wood. Ultimately, it's about personal preference more than anything.
Oh, they turn out good for sure. You just cant fix them. If its not perfect you cant sand and buff. If you scratch it, you cant fix it without re clearing it.
 
Oh, they turn out good for sure. You just cant fix them. If its not perfect you cant sand and buff. If you scratch it, you cant fix it without re clearing it.
I can see that. Once all the other work is done though, I'd probably just sand it back and re-shoot it. The hard part is done already at that point but I see what you're saying now.
 
I like them both. Beautiful is a understatement ‘

I have a general question if I may… we see a lot laminated, stocks using curly maple but why don’t guys occasionally use Birdseye maple ?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,983
Messages
2,207,157
Members
79,238
Latest member
claydunbar
Back
Top