The way I've done them in the past has always turned out good. I'm guessing I avoid what you describe because I only use the satin for the last coat. I can certainly understand it hiding what's underneath if you build it up with a flattened clear. I just would never do that over a nice piece of wood. Grain shows wonderfully. In fact, better than a high gloss. All that shine is nice and some prefer it but that shine actually takes away from the figure that's underneath. Again, so much of this can be done differently and that likely explains why we have different experience with it and the end result. Not that either is right or wrong, just different. Most people want a high gloss to ooh and ahh over and I get that too but a satin lets the grain show through as you're eyes aren't as full of glare...for lack of a better way to put it. It's a trick that's been done like that for years with other finishes for that reason, though, to show the features of a nice piece of wood. Ultimately, it's about personal preference more than anything.Ya theres different methods. If you notice, you can see the grain still in the stock. Its not clear with flattener added. Which I wont even do anymore. It has to be left as sprayed and cant be touched up. If a guy leaves a gun loose in a case it buffs it up in spots. I definately dont like a matte or satin clear on a gun stock. Im not sure what Roys doing but I know its not clearcoat.