Tango you obviously have a very biased opinion, but from my experiences and from all that I have read on the web, your opinion is in the minority today.
I have a bias but you don't . . . I see. Savages are cheap, there are a lot out there and a lot of owners, owners that want to defend their rifles. If you think that internet forum praise due to a high number of sales and representation I'd say you have a few things to learn about statistics.
I know a few die hard Remington guys that just can not accept the facts.
I'm not a Remington guy but I am curious about these purported facts you have; please refrain from using libelous CNBC specials as evidence.
Savage is one of the best shooting rifles in production right now and if I wanted to spend the amount of money to but a Tikka or a CZ, sorry, but not me, plus they are not upgradeable like the Savages are these days.
What needs to be upgraded on Tikkas and CZs that can't be done that actually has an affect on shoot-ability or accuracy?
OK the action is a like clunky, but there are no other rifles that a person can buy off the shelf and offer the accuracy.
You're smoking crack if you think there are no other rifles off the shelf that are more accurate than a Savage and that wild claim does nothing more than show your unparalleled bias for Savage.
That is something that rings true, just look at a few forums.
Again, a poor excuse for statistics and if gun forums were all that mattered for accuracy and quality all the gunsmiths out there should just close shop right now and start registering domains.
As was stated earlier, I could really care less [sic] what you may dislike about Savages, because they perform and that is all that i care about.
You didn't previously state your level of apathy concerning my opinion but if you want to start a sentence that way anyway . . . You cared enough to respond this thread, directly to my opinion and to defend your Savages - grammatical errors aside, it appears you actually do care.
Accuracy is the bottom line. All else is replaceable
So you admit Savages are sub-quality and need parts replaced. Wouldn't replacing parts add cost to that oh so impressive cost-to uber interweb accuracy-ratio thus proving you wrong?
And at the cost, it is an absolute no brainer for the buyers of these firearms. It is not a wonder that they have become so extremely popular worldwide. Those are facts that biases simply pale against.
Sales of cheap firearms does not directly correlate to quality, accuracy or any other trait other than it being affordable. The only 'fact' involved is that they're affordable and sales are high because of that. Cheap price = more sales = more fan boys. Those 'facts' simply pale against biases? According to you, when I display my opinions they're biases but when you do it they're facts. Well played! Unfortunately, trying to marginalize your opponent by being a hypocrite does nothing but make you look like a fool. "Kettle, you're black" - Pot
Wayne