• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Oh dang! - Labradar LX - Small form factor

Got mine as well over the weekend, only tried it in my
Basement with my precharged air rifles picked up every shot, very easy to set up and I prefer it much better than my buddies Garmin, it’s all metal and made in Canada, they have a winner now.
 
I view it like this, the better the LX is over time the more Garmin will keep at it and listen to customers wants and in turn hopefully Labradar as well.

Competition is always a good thing when it comes to consumer products.
 
I view it like this, the better the LX is over time the more Garmin will keep at it and listen to customers wants and in turn hopefully Labradar as well.

Competition is always a good thing when it comes to consumer products.
I bought a secondhand LabRadar back in the fall when Garmin frenzy was in full force. Got it with all of the accessories for a very good price, still no regrets.

Three years ago I paid $1000+ for a Bulletseeker Mach4, and it did about what the LabRadar and Garmin do now just for higher cost, with weaker apps, and more missed shots. I try not to think about that too much when I see what the Garmin and LabRadar LX so reliably for half the cost. I’m worn out on spending money on chronographs for at least another year or two.

Now I think this product segment is matured to the point where we can upgrade when it suits our budget and personal needs, knowing that the latest devices will be better version than the last. Game changing technology is less of a factor.
 
Yeah honestly other than a few "want" improvements to the UI the Garmin already does everything I'll ever need for data acquisition. I only moved up from my mag because I can do all my items from rubber band gun to my Swifts at 4500fps reliably and no impact on poi.

If it lasts years it will be worth it over time. Costly buggers for sure, like so many tools are.
 
An aside, I got my Garmin chrono as a gift. I have a Garmin InSight (also a gift) as I hunt alone and for some reason my wife and kids are worried about me. Garmin's customer service is the best I have encountered with ANY technical product of late, courteous, patient with old Ludites like me, never put you hold, know their stuff. Just a consideration before you spend your money.
 
Garmin, smaller, lighter, quicker menus and bootup, fast response time to the shot, 5 button presses for a new series, very intuitive app.

LX, slightly larger, definitely heavier, longer battery life (+40-50%), slower to boot up, slower response time to the shot, but only 3 button presses for a new series, app is a bit clunky, but mines been reliable to pull series from.

Both have been easy to orient.

Garmin missed a shot the other day that the LX picked up, but both have been very reliable.
Have you had issues with it picking up shots from shooters nearby? Today mine picked up two shooters on the next target over and the other shooter on my target during pair fire.
 
Depending on separation and amount of muzzle blast, you will get shots from other folks regardless of the brand of unit. It is an engineering issue. Make a trigger sensitive enough for a 'dodgy' setup, but, not sensitive enough to trigger from another muzzle blast nearby. My older LR was tripped by a guy shooting with a muzzle brake 20ft away from me. I really do hate muzzle brakes on a crowded range.

Then there is the 'unicorn' shot. Had someone shoot at the same time I did and the radar tracked his shot (probably cause it was a bigger bullet).
 
Depending on separation and amount of muzzle blast, you will get shots from other folks regardless of the brand of unit. It is an engineering issue. Make a trigger sensitive enough for a 'dodgy' setup, but, not sensitive enough to trigger from another muzzle blast nearby. My older LR was tripped by a guy shooting with a muzzle brake 20ft away from me. I really do hate muzzle brakes on a crowded range.

Then there is the 'unicorn' shot. Had someone shoot at the same time I did and the radar tracked his shot (probably cause it was a bigger bullet).
Agree. There is a time and purpose to a muzzle brake, but those who use them really need to consider where that blast is pointed and make it their own problem instead of blasting the next benches.

A portable partition that can be moved to both sides of a brake user would be the easiest way to keep everyone happy, but I don't know why ranges typically don't have them.

I had my table blown clean at an indoor range when someone came into the next lane and stuck their rifle muzzle just past the partition. It blew my gear all over the floor and the young man didn't blink an eye or acknowledge it was their doing.

I had to stop and wait for them to finish but gave the range master a few words about where he places rifle shooters at an otherwise indoor pistol range. He didn't understand my gripe, so I invited him to step inside my lane and let that kid shoot the rifle. It rung his bell so bad he apologized and moved the rifle shooter to the far end against a wall.

As far as running a Doppler Radar at a crowded indoor or outdoor range, it does take some patients to wait for the neighbor to have a gap in their shooting to take your data. I don't have the problem at my clubs, but if I spare myself the 60-mile drive and go to the nearby indoor range for a quick test, I just wait or ask to space out the lanes.

There is a beam divergence on all of these units, so they neighboring shots have to be close enough to cause trouble, and that can happen at an indoor range or a tightly spaced outdoor rifle range.
 
Depending on separation and amount of muzzle blast, you will get shots from other folks regardless of the brand of unit. It is an engineering issue.

This isn’t exactly correct.

The Garmin and Athlon radar chronographs are radar triggered, whereas the Caldwell Velociradar and both LabRadar V1 and LX are acoustic triggered (with wired recoil trigger options). So the Garmin and the Athlon don’t care about muzzle blast, they only care about bullet signature within their beam. The LabRadars and VelociRadar can be triggered by a nearby blast, even if the bullet does not pass through their beam.

IMG_2142.jpeg

I certainly do agree, at small, close quarters indoor ranges, any of them can and will pick up shots from neighboring shooters - but I will say, the Garmins have done very well at filtering these for me (although I’m not shooting indoors currently as often as I once was).

Does the new version support the external trigger (rifle mounted)?
Yes.
 
This isn’t exactly correct.

The Garmin and Athlon radar chronographs are radar triggered, whereas the Caldwell Velociradar and both LabRadar V1 and LX are acoustic triggered (with wired recoil trigger options). So the Garmin and the Athlon don’t care about muzzle blast, they only care about bullet signature within their beam.
At our club, we often have several Garmins on the line simultaneously and they don't interfere with each other. It doesn't matter even when they're on adjacent shooting positions. I read on Garmin's website that the chronograph uses a frequency hopping algorithm. If it detects another transmitter, it shifts its own frequency to another channel to avoid interference. I assume it can also detect other brands of RADAR chronographs and shift its transmit frequency.

This is in contrast to the original Labradar. It's necessary to manually choose its transmit frequency. I had issues with mine when more than one chronograph was on the line. Typically, they were set to the same (default) transmit channel. People didn't know how or why to change the channel, so they didn't. They used the factory default setting. Change the channel and the interference problems disappeared. It's great that the Garmin does that "automagically."
 
At our club, we often have several Garmins on the line simultaneously and they don't interfere with each other. It doesn't matter even when they're on adjacent shooting positions. I read on Garmin's website that the chronograph uses a frequency hopping algorithm. If it detects another transmitter, it shifts its own frequency to another channel to avoid interference. I assume it can also detect other brands of RADAR chronographs and shift its transmit frequency.

This is in contrast to the original Labradar. It's necessary to manually choose its transmit frequency. I had issues with mine when more than one chronograph was on the line. Typically, they were set to the same (default) transmit channel. People didn't know how or why to change the channel, so they didn't. They used the factory default setting. Change the channel and the interference problems disappeared. It's great that the Garmin does that "automagically."
When I shoot at our club, using a Garmin, I will often have a Garmin next to me, sometimes on either side of me. I have found on occasion the Garmin picks up the shot next to me and shows on the screen that it has picked up a shot, then it discards the shot. Nothing is recorded. Even if it picks up a shot next to me, then I shoot seconds later, it only records my shot. Have no idea how it does this, but it works.
 
Last edited:
we often have several Garmins on the line simultaneously and they don't interfere with each other.

Garmins have automated channel hopping capability, so they detect interfering units and change channel to dodge the interference. This ONLY happens when the unit is initialized, so it’s not fool proof, but it does prevent most of the issues shooters can have.

However, I will state directly, Garmins have a “warning message” which will tell shooters when the Garmin “senses” co-channel interference after initialization, it can warn the shooter to restart the unit and force the channel hop - or, of course, move out of range of the interfering unit.

The LabRadar LX’s retain the ability to swap channels manually, but because the LX’s are acoustically triggered, rather than radar triggered, the ONLY way the shooter will notice is when they have a bad reading from a false-echo record.

Athlons do not have any ability to swap channels, so they cannot get out of the way of co-channel interference unless physically removed from the proximity of the interfering unit. (Personally, I do suspect they are sensitive to NEAR-channel interference as well, because I have repeatedly ran into co-channel interference with all 3 of the Athlons I have used, which is a much higher rate of occurrence than then combination of ~100-150 possible channels would suggest).

Recognizing: co-channel interference, systemic interference, picking up neighboring muzzle blasts with acoustic triggers, triggering for neighbor’s shots which break the beam, and recording neighbors shots which break the beam are all independent failure modes.

I have found on occasion the Garmin picks up the shot next to me and shows on the screen that it has picked up a shot, then it discards the shot. Nothing is recorded. Even if it picks up a shot next to me, then I shoot seconds later, it only records my shot. Have no idea how it does this, but it works.

It’s largely a process of comparison of echo reception - these units are hitting the bullet with multiple “pings,” so it does have some ability to determine which shots are intentionally aligned to the beam and which are not. Not perfect, of course - I’ve had all of them pick up neighboring shots and display as intentional shots (not only during the process of TRYING to make that happen). But by and large, the programming around “is that our bullet or not” is doing pretty well.
 
The fact that the Garmon LX will accept a recoil trigger will seal the deal for me. I use one on my LabRadar and it simply eliminates the problems of missed shots or sound interference from the next bench. The sensors are cheap, around $25, and they really work well. I have a small piece of velcro on each rifle on the side of the stock about half way between the action and the front end of the stock. With the mating velcro on the back of the sensor, I just slap it on the rifle that I am testing.
Also I can use my iphone with the labradar app, and never touch the LX when I am testing loads.

Again, Varminterror, thanks for the info.
 
The fact that the Garmon LX will accept a recoil trigger will seal the deal for me. I use one on my LabRadar and it simply eliminates the problems of missed shots or sound interference from the next bench.

Owning the LabRadar for something like 8 years, and now using the LabRadar LX, Garmin Xero C1, and Athlon Velocity Pro, that “problem of missed shots” has almost completely been eliminated.

The “sound” from neighbors will remain a factor, as I described above, for the LabRadar LX, but only because of its design to use an acoustic radar as its primary trigger mode - with manually selected option to use an external recoil trigger. The Garmin and the Athlon use radar echo triggers, NOT acoustic triggers, so they cannot be triggered by neighboring blast.

What we had to do with recoil triggers and the LabRadar V1 (and the copycat Caldwell VelociRadar, which comes with a recoil trigger, and also uses an acoustic trigger as the default) has conditioned you to expect a paradigm which has completely evaporated when it comes to using the new units on the market, especially the Garmin.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,574
Messages
2,221,412
Members
79,720
Latest member
TMA
Back
Top