• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Nightforce Scope Problem

No one is perfect. Likewise, no manufacturer has an absolutely perfect track record. If a problem occurs, the first step should always be to give the manufacturer the opportunity to correct the problem.
I'm trying to work with them.
 
Stiller told you wrong about bedding the bases, I've seen more than one come in with accuracy issues and when you pull the base you can see where it's working, I won't send a rifle out with a rail not bedded especially with a heavy NF going on top.
 
Stiller told you wrong about bedding the bases, I've seen more than one come in with accuracy issues and when you pull the base you can see where it's working, I won't send a rifle out with a rail not bedded especially with a heavy NF going on top.
Are you familiar with the Stiller Predator action and picatinny base? It is pinned and attached with screws.
 
I received the scope, mounted per their suggestions, and torqued it to their specs. I will test it and report results. I'm convinced Nightforce makes good quality optics. Their scopes have been used to set records and win many matches. I also know that anything mechanical can fail and no manufacturer is perfect.
I did some more testing, and it has improved very much. In this area it's difficult to catch a day without wind issues. I hope to do a box test.
 
Are you familiar with the Stiller Predator action and picatinny base? It is pinned and attached with screws.
I am extremely familiar with them since I build dozens of heavy cal long range rifles on them a year, they need bedded, I've seen a number of them that were not bedded start allowing zero to move, bedded them and they've been fine for years.
 
I am extremely familiar with them since I build dozens of heavy cal long range rifles on them a year, they need bedded, I've seen a number of them that were not bedded start allowing zero to move, bedded them and they've been fine for years.
I had mine bedded today. I appreciate the input. Will test it this Sunday and report back.
 
I am extremely familiar with them since I build dozens of heavy cal long range rifles on them a year, they need bedded, I've seen a number of them that were not bedded start allowing zero to move, bedded them and they've been fine for years.
This was going completely off of paper and everything was tight. I can see how slight movement might cause several inches, but this was off the chart movement. I had it bedded and will do extensive testing.
 
I received the scope, mounted per their suggestions, and torqued it to their specs. I will test it and report results. I'm convinced Nightforce makes good quality optics. Their scopes have been used to set records and win many matches. I also know that anything mechanical can fail and no manufacturer is perfect.
I had the base bedded. It seems to be holding zero. I will do additional testing for tracking.
 
No one is perfect. Likewise, no manufacturer has an absolutely perfect track record. If a problem occurs, the first step should always be to give the manufacturer the opportunity to correct the problem.

???
First step is verify everything (including barrel) like he did. Second step is verify the rifles accuracy with another scope, like he did. 3rd step, The OP sent the scope to NF and they sent it back saying it was fine. Yet it has the same problem. All before he ever posted this topic.

So it's not like he's bashing NF before giving them a chance. They had the scope, but seemed to have misplaced their responsibility amongst their arrogance.
 
You're a little late to this parade. My comment was general to anyone reading this thread, not specifically aimed at the OP, who as you pointed out did the right thing. Too many times in other posts (NOT this one), I have seen people rant and attack a manufacturer before giving them the opportunity to identify and/or correct a problem. It seemed like a reasonable place to make the statement I made. In any event, from his more recent posts it looks as though it wasn't the scope, or at least it seems to be holding zero now. That would lead me to believe NF's original response was correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRS
You're a little late to this parade. My comment was general to anyone reading this thread, not specifically aimed at the OP, who as you pointed out did the right thing. Too many times in other posts (NOT this one), I have seen people rant and attack a manufacturer before giving them the opportunity to identify and/or correct a problem. It seemed like a reasonable place to make the statement I made. In any event, from his more recent posts it looks as though it wasn't the scope, or at least it seems to be holding zero now. That would lead me to believe NF's original response was correct.
It has grouped better since they sent it back. The rifle has not grouped as well with the NF scope as it did when I mounted my Leupold VX-6 4-24 on it. I did some tracking tests and I am not pleased with the results. That being said, I am not sure my testing was the best it could be. I am sending it to another shooter to test it on his proven accurate rifle. After those tests are done, I will test it again with a load that shoots accurately in the rifle.130 Berger Load Development 5-28-16.jpg 130 Berger Load Development 5-28-16.jpg
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,556
Messages
2,198,204
Members
78,961
Latest member
Nicklm
Back
Top