I have a j lock era vls in .223 that is extremely accurate with 40 v maxes. I think the new Remingtons are hit and miss with quality and accuracy. I would look for an older one but I wouldn't expect the 12 twist .223's to shoot 55s all that well.
Plus one on the Mueller scope. A great buy for the money and all of mine track very well and repeatedly.
Buy a Savage and don't look back.I own a pair and intend to buy more.
Greg
You know, with each passing year, I hear more and more quality horror stories about Remington. And I'm a Remington Man. I'm not talking about deep hidden issues but grade school, easily noticeable stuff that should never have made it by QC much less out the front door. It's as if there's a bunch of monkeys slinging stuff out the back door any more. I mean, if you can't even drill the scope base mounting holes in top of the action in a straight line then I have to question their ability to handle more complex tasks.I just got in two Remington's that started life as bare actions and came in as barreled actions. One didn't have the scope base screw holes tapped. Of course I didn't catch it until after they were Cerakoted. No big deal to run a tap in but no good deed goes unpunished. I broke a tap. Finish on the bolt got chewed up.
While that $297.00 Remington might be a good deal if all you're looking for is something to put meat on the table you have to realize that they will not get better as long as people are OK with an inferior rifle. What drives quality control is sales. Stop buying those cheap guns and they will be forced to build better guns or go out of business.Have bought some of their recent stuff and have some older stuff. I've had great luck with their varmint contour barrels in .223 and .308. In fact, I couldn't ask for better accuracy out of a factory tube. Their recent sporter barrels are OK for hunting and will hold MOA for 3 shots. What I do see is a canted recoil lug as well as a horrible finish on the blued (i.e. SPS/ADL) models. While I've not had rust issues (I keep them oiled), it does feel like there is grit in the action when running the bolt due to a rough bolt and raceway. I'll give $297 for a package Remington 700 from Wal-Mart. I won't give any more. Maybe I'm to blame.
While that $297.00 Remington might be a good deal if all you're looking for is something to put meat on the table you have to realize that they will not get better as long as people are OK with an inferior rifle. What drives quality control is sales. Stop buying those cheap guns and they will be forced to build better guns or go out of business.
I have two Tikka heavy blue in .223 , one NIB the other has been shooting winning groups for two years now...paid less than 1 k for each. the stocks can be helped with pillars and some relief of forearm material, all the best scores are shot with Tikka and Savage rifles at our Tuesday fun matches....in .223 and out to 300 yds.I drank the Sako/Tikka KoolAid and lived to regret it; only now getting my A7 to shoot (after 150+ test rounds), but still doesn't always eject and rounds pop thru the mag in warm weather. Wish now I'd just re-barreled one of my "known-entity" 700s to desired chambering.
The low-end Sako A7 and Tikka T-3s are IMO just Euro-trash versions of Savage Axis, Rem 783, etc.; you have to get into say, at least an $1800 Sako 85 to break into the accuracy, quality - and (barely) prestige (according to the snotty Sako Owners Club). But, the T3 Tikka Varmints do seem to be almost always accurate; wish they sold the .243 here. Another issue with Tikka-Sako is their purchase by Berreta; not sure their QC and CS is any better than the conglomerate that owns Remington is.
Another option would be to just spend the extra bucks for a semi-custom 700 from RedHawk Rifles (or, if one's a Savage fan, Shaw's), and save some worry while getting somewhat of an accuracy guarantee. Or, buy a 700 action from Bud's or Northwest and go from there...