Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't see it clearly in the picture, but the nose cone shape is very different. The 144 is wider further out. They do have very similar boattails and bearing surfaces though.Something doesn’t look right to me. In the pic showing the 4 Bullets, the 140 and 144 Berger look almost identical. How could you possibly have that big of a change to contact? I’m not arguing. I’m just curious.
I have done extensive tests with the 147 ELD and 144 Berger in my 29" 6.5x47 Kreiger/Bat F-class rifle.
I tested several (9) powders for velocity, then seating depth, then primers.
Attached is a 144 Berger primer test, shot at 600 yards.
1st target 20 shots for score using BR4 primers.
2nd target 20 shots for score using #450 Primers.
All else is same, except for the wind. Shot back to back, had a wind flag at 300, apparently I ignored it a few times! This was shot during a 10 mph full value cross wind.
This is an AR service rifle target which is 2X ring size of a normal F-Open MR-1 mid range target. Any shot outside the 6" diameter X ring would be a 9 score (one point penalty) in F-Open.
Seems like too much vertical (~5" 1MOA) for my liking, could be better...the right target is with CCI #450 and the left with BR4.
If the #450 hadn't dropped one shot low on the right target, I would feel pretty good about it, I needed a little more elevation on that string. Excluding the one low shot, the vertical is 4.40", which is workable.
Seems like the BR4 primer launched two shots high.
Go figure!
View attachment 1195413 View attachment 1195414
Hi Evan,
Not sorting primers, cases or bullets.
Might need to sort cases however, that may explain dropped or high shots. I keep telling myself to trash cases that shoot high or low immediately upon extraction! Hard to do tho..
I did not find any consistency with any of my 147 ELD groups. One day .25 moa, the next .75 moa. No time to sort them.
Berger 144s much better.
In my 6.5x47 barrel and relative short freebore, the best powders were: RL-17, N550, Stabal6.5 and H414.
Worst powders were: RL-16, IMR4350, H4350, IMR4451, Superformance.
Your results may be different. I wont have heavy bolt lift, I stop there - to prevent galled lugs. My freebore prevents huge charge weights - so my coal with 144s is around 2.850”.
I should also mention I used Quickload to make all my initial powder selections for the heavy bullets in the 6.5x47 case, since little data exists in the loading manuals. I ran QL simulations till I was sick of it.
I also did not compress loads over 103-4%.
So there are lots of possibilities still out there.