March vs NF

[Tesoro]

Can you expound on what was “off”? Was there insufficient adjustment to place the reticle on the scope’s focal plane?

ie: I will use the focus to find wind in focus at a specific distance setting down range with my HM cause it works the way it is supposed to. (I shoot in mountains) With my NXS if I were shooting at 100 I think I had to dial the focus/parallax to a setting for 350 yds ! same with the other 2 I had but dont remember specifics. Seems like for such a hyped up product you should not have to set parallax at a different range to be in focus at the range you are using. Just google NF+parallax problems!

 

[saunaking]

Honestly I have not done a side by side comparison. I do think both seem very clear and are a step up from the glass in the GEs. I haven’t used the SVSSED for some time due to the weight.

I have both the SVSSed and the S6 (66012). The SV has the standard floating dot, while the S6 is MOA-BD reticle. The SV has slightly better glass overall, but my old eyes can't see much difference. The biggest advantage is being able to use 32" 1.25 inch diameter barrels with the S6, as opposed to having to use the the "Speedy profile" if you want to go with 32 barrel and the SV.
The SV is built like a tank with massive turrets. Both have well built mechanics, and both of the ones that I have were dead nuts on with the box test performed.
Cheers

 

[HTSmith]

Once he started doing well in US sales he ordered the Japanese company, now dedicated to his production, to start cutting corners to reduce his costs.

And I thought American companies had a corner on this

 

[rwj]

And I thought American companies had a corner on this

Nah… greed is universal!

 

[Retired shooter]

Nah… greed is universal!

Especially corporate.!