These threads are all devolving into the same old topic. That topic being that people are mad as hell that their needs are not being met. I'm stunned by the number of people making collectivist arguments and
These threads are all devolving into the same old topic. That topic being that people are mad as hell that their needs are not being met. I'm stunned by the number of people making collectivist arguments and joining the cult of victimhood.
And you sound like your taking your own medicine. Way to be proactive there Rambo.
Has anyone sat down and written out a statement to the any of the manufacturers that explains the specific problem? These are public companies with typical MBA's at the helm. They need to have it put into their own language.
- Has anyone performed a cost\benefit analysis of providing components only?
- What ratio would satisfy or reduce the demand curve?
- Has anyone performed a profit\ratio study to determine what the market would bear in a cost analysis?
- Is it sustainable?
- Can capacity be created in manufacturing?
- Is there achievable goodwill and community standing in publicly acknowledging and addressing shortfalls?
- Is there an equitable return on investment by promoting competitive shooting sports? Will new shooters be apt to become "volume" shooters if there is availability to use their "shiny new toys"?
- How much "marketability" is lost by not addressing shortfalls? Will our traditional customers poorly review emerging products unfavorably from spite? Are new or improved products going to be ignored. If you need evidence of this just ask Remington, or Bushmaster, or Winchester, or...
These companies may not have addressed these issues because they are not aware of secondary markets (That just happen to be PRIMARY MARKETS to a portion of their customers). They are just trying to keep their heads above water and their board of directors is trying to take profit as quickly as possible before the bubble bursts.
It doesn't have to burst. There is a sustainable path forward.
Fair analysis is necessary to determine that new path forward. I cannot look at the company's books or make a guess at what they have determined or where they plan to capitalize in the future. CEO's make the case to the board. They are too busy to think about us unless we notify them. They can't make a sales package to the board and investors without defining the problem and a potential solution.
The current scenario is not pretty. Many shooting sports are going to be adversely affected by shortages. Standards and rules will need to be altered to make the sport accessible - the days of 250+ round matches are dwindling. I would like to see sustainable competitive shooting - it ain't going to happen at benchrest, PRS, FPS, F-class, or many other disciplines with factory ammo.
What I can do is try to send a politely worded and succinct memo and suggestions instead of a rant.
Kind of like you...