Thanks for sharing your experience based information on these various issues. I hope you continue to do so in the futures.We've maybe seen 2-3 guns reliably average this good.
That’s 2-3 guns out of how many tested?
Thanks for sharing your experience based information on these various issues. I hope you continue to do so in the futures.We've maybe seen 2-3 guns reliably average this good.
This is what I look for in a lot. I don't shoot Olympic style only RFBR ARA to be more correct. only 25 shots but this was not in a tunnel it was shot outside. 0.084 +.223 = 0.307More importantly is when you overlay 4 or 5 - 10 shot groups what then is the total group size. Olympic standard was a 40 shot group < or = to 14mm at 50 meters
Could you please put a little more flesh on this, ie. is the 14mm ctc or outside. And by Olympic standard do you mean rifles needed to achieve this standard in order to have a chance to win an event. What event? And under what conditions would the test groups have been shot ...indoors?from a bench?in a fixture.More importantly is when you overlay 4 or 5 - 10 shot groups what then is the total group size. Olympic standard was a 40 shot group < or = to 14mm at 50 meters
Could you please put a little more flesh on this, ie. is the 14mm ctc or outside. And by Olympic standard do you mean rifles needed to achieve this standard in order to have a chance to win an event. What event? And under what conditions would the test groups have been shot ...indoors?from a bench?in a fixture.
I am not challenging the veracity of your info ... I just really want to understand the context. Thanks.
Shooting consistently good results outdoors at 100 yards is challenging. Even in the calmest of conditions there are times that suggest that the ammo is less consistent than desired.So here’s question about acceptable 10 shot group size at 100 yds you may be able to shed light on given the accumulated data from your testing.
Can you give us your opinion, based on your testing, what is a reasonably acceptable 10 shot group size at 100 yds for a rifle/ammo combo? And even, better, can you give us two answers, one for custom and one for factory.
What I’m looking for is some general guidance from your testing results to help us testing at home evaluate what we should be aiming for in terms of 10 shot group size at 100 yds








Eck? Seriously?? Are you, perhaps, new to the Galaxy?TRSR8,
Eck ?
Dave Way ,
My metric to imperial is not a mental smooth transition , I basically think imperial , 6mm =.243 etc , known equivalents
So ,,,,, thank you
Edit :
I was typing while others answered , about c to c and edge to edge
Thanks
Many more times than not people ask questions because they are lazy to do just a minimal search first. Spoon feeding comes to mind. And I'm not from NY, but northern Jersey just out of the city. I'm talking generality here.I don’t shoot bench rest , and it’s not done or popular ,local /close to me , I do however like to shoot and like accurate rifles and learning /tinkering , mild gunsmithing
My Sincerest apologies for not putting two and two together when seeing the last name Eck and immediately thinking Gordon Eck , God forbid I should have anything else on my mind and not be as perfect as you are
This is great , people love when some ask a question and someone else jumps on them instead of offering a simple reply with a nice simple answer , you fit the typical NY stereotype , although I’ve done business with people in New York they must’ve been outside the city and they’re actually quite nice you make me rethink I don’t like New York anymore
Anyway ,I will try not to disturb you with any more questions or take up any of your time and I would your reciprocation
I don’t shoot bench rest , and it’s not done or popular ,local /close to me , I do however like to shoot and like accurate rifles and learning /tinkering , mild gunsmithing
My Sincerest apologies for not putting two and two together when seeing the last name Eck and immediately thinking Gordon Eck , God forbid I should have anything else on my mind and not be as perfect as you are
This is great , people love when some ask a question and someone else jumps on them instead of offering a simple reply with a nice simple answer , you fit the typical NY stereotype , although I’ve done business with people in New York they must’ve been outside the city and they’re actually quite nice you make me rethink I don’t like New York anymore
Anyway ,I will try not to disturb you with any more questions or take up any of your time and I would your reciprocation
This is an interesting point. One could posit that overlaying five 10 shot groups allows you to just add up the total number of shots for one big beautiful group size. And I think this process probably does give a reasonable result. One caveat to think about: when you shoot all your shots at one bullseye, there are a certain number of minute technique variables between each shot introduced by things like slight changes in grip, trigger pull, gun movement in the rest, etc. When you add in the additional degree of slight technique variations by moving to a different bullseye after every 5 shots the results can be affected. One would expect that more variation should equal a wider total group. The question is if the effect of added variation by shooting multiple bulls and its effect on total group size is significant or even measurable. I don’t know the answer to that. Does anyone have any data on that?More importantly is when you overlay 4 or 5 - 10 shot groups what then is the total group size. Olympic standard was a 40 shot group < or = to 14mm at 50 meters
6mm = .236 inchTRSR8,
Eck ?
Dave Way ,
My metric to imperial is not a mental smooth transition , I basically think imperial , 6mm =.243 etc , known equivalents
So ,,,,, thank you
Edit :
I was typing while others answered , about c to c and edge to edge
Thanks
No.Would using a tuner be able to compensate for velocity variations at 100 yards ?
Obviously not everyone is of the PC school of thought.Would using a tuner be able to compensate for velocity variations at 100 yards ?
Strong advice from a guy that insulted an entire state.Hey John mind your business and Trar8
This is simple , I look at the post , E c k , I’m not perfect , what is Eck , I made a mistake , just say , Gordon Eck , don’t be Jerk , I try to be helpful , and not be an a jerk on the forums
I remember those days but my preference was Scotch. Got me on trouble more than once. We're good. Nice post. I too could have done better.My last comment on this whole subject
and I wish a “MODERATOR” would delete all of this junk and let it go back on track to the subject Whidden started and get this thread back on track
1. If I would not have been curious as to what E c k meant and asked ,this would not have happened
2. If you would have said Gordon Eck, this would probably not have happened
3. If you had come back and just said hey Gordon Eck the gunsmith, this ,,,,,,,,probably would not have happened
4.if I had not had a whisky or two before one of the responses I may not have typed what I typed
5. If I had done what I usually do and just let people be what people be on the internet , and let you make your jerk of a comment and not say anything this would not be happening ,,,,,but I was in a mood to not put up with people at that particular moment and felt the need to respond ,,,,, people feel strong , empowered , behind a keyboard
So ,,,,,, with that , I will make a sincere, apology to the people of NY , whom I have grouped into one group because of the actions of one individual , again my apologies to NY as I do know , have met and dealt with some very nice people from there
Now without further ado , let us please get this thread back on track and try to learn something
I would also like to apologize to Whidden gun works for the slight derail
