It's an error.
The representative at Labradar told me the unit was actually measuring the speed of unburned powder.
It's an error.
Hmmm. It was my impression that plugging something in to the trigger jack on the unit disabled the blast-trigger. I can verify that this weekend (3-12, 13.)
I've run Oehler 33 and 35p chronographs for about 35 years and have been happy with it.ive been around the orange Sponge Bob machines at our range. They seem to have just as many issues as the old screen style I use just in different areas.When they are down to $250 I "might" buy one.the phenomenon I am seeing with them is shooters will fixate on the data and pay less attention to their bag handling and range conditions.
I did some testing where we fired different rifles through a labradar, light curtain and magnetospeed at the same time, Then compared the results.
We found the Labradar was less accurate with 223 and more accurate with 308. It seems to have a hard time seeing smaller projectiles.
One other interesting tidbit I ran into (that I forgot to post):
LR has a battery door that hides a spot for 6 - AA batteries. I was getting a weird error where the LR said the battery condition was too poor to arm, despite having a battery bank attached to the USB port. So, to verify that I was running on the battery bank, I removed one of the AA cells. Got the same error. So to check, I removed the battery bank, and was surprised to see the attached image as a result. Apparently, the LR uses 2 banks of 3 AA cells in parallel. Kind of a surprise to pull one battery and still have the unit work.
My battery bank problem ended up being a balky cable.
When we have had a full set of benches with multiple Labradar users they seem to have trouble.i just don't set up a chronograph all that much these days.Most of the LabRadar issues are user error. There is a definite learning curve to using one. I too was a long time user of the Oehler 35 series. My LabRadar replaced a 35P severe years ago and I'll never go back.
What did you use to determine which chrono was more accurate?
We compared the reading between all 3 chronographs for each shot. With larger calibers the values aligned closely relative to each other.
With the 223 however there was strange outliers that were in agreement between the light curtain and magnetospeed but the labradar was off considerably. The value provided by the labradar was well outside the bounds of probability given the ES of the well tested load used.
The only explanation we surmised was that it was likely because the projectile was smaller and therefore harder to pick up on the radar, but you are welcome to draw your own conclusions.
When we have had a full set of benches with multiple Labradar users they seem to have trouble.i just don't set up a chronograph all that much these days.
The Oehler can be a pain to set up if you don't have a good system. The orange monster seems easier I'd think?
Good info.i will pass it alongThe issue with multiple LabRadar uses is mostly likely channel separation. If they are all operating on the same channel, none will work. There are a dozen channels, IIRC, and instructions in the manual to make sure of channel separation.
I am not throwing stones. One day at the range my LR was working great--as usual, then it quit working. A couple buddies had shown up with their LabRadar. I jokingly said "mine was working fine until you guys showed up" which got us to start digging. Right there plain as day in the manual it takes about channel separation. We set different channels and everything worked great again.
One day at the range my LR was working great--as usual, then it quit working. A couple buddies had shown up with their LabRadar.
Obviously we were hoping to get the same speed on all three systems but that was never the case.Got it. It really wasn't less accurate, but less reliable with the 22z
That brings up one of the issues with any chronograph. We really don't know how precisely they measure the true velocity. That said, perfectly accurate velocities aren't as important as many might think.....
My only real complaint with the LabRadar is they chose to use a Micro or Mini USB connector for the external battery pack. I have used mine so much that the connector receptacle has lost its ability to grip the connector. I can bend the metal back in shape, but that won't last for long.
INTJ: I shared your same concern with the micro USB port. The solution is fairly simple and not expensive at all. Instead of plugging into the USB port and unplugging all the time I use a magnetic connector permanently attached to the micro USB port on the LR and a mating cable for the external battery. I'll attempt to attach three pictures that explain my setup. The cable and connectors were purchased on Amazon, we use the same setup to charge cell phones and most anything else that uses the micro USB ports.
The products come from Net Dot called NetDot Magnetic Products, they have tons of different of these types of products for different purposes. BTW:I have no affiliation with any of the above.
Mike
I Velcro the lithium battery to the front of the LabRadar and use a 6" right-angle cable for the connection.