The 185 Juggernaut will be sunk pretty far down in the neck when seated to be fed from a magazine. Nonetheless, they should shoot just fine, assuming the rifle has at least a 12-twist barrel (preferably 11-twist). If you're feeding from a mag as is likely, just be sure to start out well to the low side with charge weight testing, as you will have less effective case volume with the bullets seated well down into the case. For seating depth testing, determine the longest average COAL you can reliably feed from your magazine. Next, determine average CBTO for those same rounds and set that as your "zero" reference point, then test bullets seated incrementally farther from the lands. Regardless of the actual distance from the lands, you should be able to find an optimized seating depth window using this method, and by starting at the "zero" reference point with regard to feeding from the mag, and only seating bullets further off the lands, whatever load you come up with should not be too long feed reliably.
The 185 Juggernaut is likely a much heavier and longer bullet than you will likely be accustomed to loading for an AR platform. However, it is very forgiving with respect to tuning loads (i.e. seating depth). There is no need to push it excessively hard with respect to velocity/pressure. Let the rifle tell where it wants to shoot and if the resulting load seems a bit slower than you might be accustomed to, so be it. The higher BC of the Juggernaut will take care of that.
Edited to add: if for any reason you are not satisfied with the performance of the Juggernauts, don't be concerned, as you can easily sell the remainder off. If that happens, I would suggest giving the Berger 175 OTM bullet a look. It also has a tangent ogive, a good BC, and is very forgiving to tune, but is a little better suited to feeding from a magazine due to its shorter length dimensions.