You know what, just tell me what range you are the match director at, so I can be sure not to shoot there.
As was said..there ya go. It is what it is and now it's clear. Agree or disagree, but lets all just go shoot and enjoy!
kzin...are you a lawyer?
No. Analyst/programmer for 30 years.kzin...are you a lawyer?
Common sense would discern from the above statement that the forend contact patch with the bag cannot exceed 3" wide and the front to back contact length of the bag cannot exceed 3".
You must not remember carpet-gate!
Or I remember it VERY well
Maybe go back to muzzle loaders and lock that in?
Works for me. Thx Keith for getting to the bottom of this!
We all have opinions. I'm sorry if I said anything to upset anyone. I tried to be clear that it was just my opinion. This clarification doesn't change my opinion but it's an answer, whether I like or agree with it is not the point, to me. Yes, I think it'd be nice if equipment rules were more universal across more disciplines and that was my point all along. I feel bad for Rod, who apparently felt like he had been given a different understanding and has a lot of time and money invested in a fantastic rest/top design. All that is water under the bridge now unless it is a determining factor to if someone competes in this game or not. It hasn't deterred me but it has opened my eyes to some things that I wish were not a part of the sport and that there are still differences in how things are viewed. It's up to me now, as to if I choose to participate in f class or not. Nuff said really. I enjoy a good debate over things like this and I hope it gets people to think, even if I don't agree with the outcome. It does seem as though it was a compromise, although I'm sure neither side really sees it that way, as I do.
A gun that can't move, generally won't shoot well. As I said before...let em lock em down tight as hell, until they figure out that perceived advantage may well have been a disadvantage. Again, I like simple rules but this has been settled in my mind.
Unfortunately, too late for some thinking about joining in my experience, and too late for many who might read this thread. We are our worst enemy, all while complaining about others.
Yes, and that’s why I innovate. I never intended to cause a problem and was never told my equipment was not allowed. In short, the system worked. Someone filed a question or complaint about my rollers and did so properly. It then went through the process and was ruled illegal by the committee. Good job!
" I think it spells out you have to wear trousers, not shorts." No, it spells out that IF you are wearing trousers, they may have non-slip applied but not of the type smallbore shooters wear. Shorts aren't mentioned nor anything else is specified for the bottom half.
Excellent news. Please keep us posted on what you have for sale. I am always looking for new hardware. We need more active shooters and less people complaining about an "interpertation" of a rule. Good luck in PRS, you think Fclass has politics you aint seen nothing yet. Drop me a PM on what youre selling....
Interesting find.
