Alex Wheeler
Site $$ Sponsor
By running a mandrel over it that may remove some or iron it in, maybe running a brush over it would help. I just tested it painting the neck and seating the bullet since I dont madrel.
I’ve been using Imperial Dry Neck Lube for a good while now, but have been reading a good bit about the Neo Lube product and was wondering if it is better than the other? I can see that as the Neo Lube is a liquid that dries, you might get a more even distribution of the product on the necks, over the powder. I realize that they are both graphite, but does the Neolube do a better job? I was wondering if anyone has actually used both and compared them as they translate into results on paper?
No, Neolube#2 isn't building up a resin layer, it is just graphite. Some graphite may stay behind, but gunpowder soot is mostly similar.Does repeated use cause a build up of the resin?
It will take a little longer for Lock-ease solvents to evaporate compared to the isopropanol used in Neo.
Stoddard Solvent was a historical dry cleaning fluid. It isn't in the Lock-ease to flash off quickly but it is intended to help both transport some graphite as well as penetrate a stubborn or distressed lock.I tested this in a side by side comparison dropping the same amount by volume on a plastic lid and letting the solvent flash off. The solvent in the Neolube evaporated within minutes and was dry to the touch. The Lock-ease was still wet hours later. At that point, I decided there was no way for me to determine how fast the solvent in the Lock-ease flashed off. I assume the solvent did indeed evaporate at some point and the reason it was still wet was due to it having a petroleum base. I have no other explanation.
The company write-up says it contains a thermo plastic resin. Also states it contains a binder (the resin)? Look at the price, add HAZMET $. Is this price correct. It's from the NEOLUBE website?No, Neolube#2 isn't building up a resin layer, it is just graphite. Some graphite may stay behind, but gunpowder soot is mostly similar.
Neolube #2 is designed to "plate out" on a surface.
It has a narrow spectrum of particle size, mostly 4 microns with the largest being 10 microns. It is 3 - 3.5% by weight of graphite. The carrier is isopropanol with traces of halogenated solvents in the ppm range. It is not designed to leave any layer of resin or oils. The carrier is basically all going to evaporate and leave you with a graphite layer that is roughly 0.0002" - 0.0004" thick, unless you really stack it on to make it thicker. The main idea is for use as an anti-galling lubricant for fasteners in aerospace and nuke environments where there is an effort to control organic and hydrocarbon contamination.
Lock-ease is designed to penetrate into capillaries and gaps in locks.
It has a very wide spectrum of graphite particle size compared to Neolube #2 from very coarse to very fine. It also contains as much aluminum isopropoxide. Both of these are listed as 0.1 - 1% by weight. For the most part, it is Stoddard Solvent and Naptha with some other hydrocarbon ingredients. It will take a little longer for Lock-ease solvents to evaporate compared to the isopropanol used in Neo. The main idea is to get inside gaps in locks and to penetrate joints to free them up, and to leave graphite and aluminum propoxide behind over the long term.
Both of these have their pros and cons in terms of reloading usage. YMMV
But you could probably mix up your own...
Yes, however... It is less than 0.01% of the content and barely detectable unless you are in the lab.The company write-up says it contains a thermo plastic resin. Also states it contains a binder (the resin)? Look at the price, add HAZMET $. Is this price correct. It's from the NEOLUBE website?
Amazon or MicroMartWhere can you buy the NEO LUBE??