• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

How to open a bolt face?

The original comment was regarding pressure. Grendel pressure is right up there with the BR's. Does the larger diameter (.473") change things? Just trying to understand whats going on. Thanks

Bolt thrust is easy to calculate:


It's likely as others have stated, that the mini receiver was not designed to handle the bolt thrust of "standard" diameter caseheads.

Other receivers, like the ubiquitous M700, use the same receiver design insofar as bolt lugs and abutments whether it's a non-magnum, or magnum- which is why opening the boltface or changing bolts is commonly done. Different story when it comes to Lapua boltface cartridges, where the increased bolt thrust is not considered in the design engineering. Some will do this conversion on standard magnum receivers (not moi), and while it's not likely to result in a catastrophic failure off the bat, the potential for plastic deformation of the lugs and abutments (setback) resulting in increasing headspace is expected.
 
Yes it does. Bolt thrust increases as well as the hoop strength of the barrel tenon.
Where does one find these hoop strength and bolt thrust calculations? Ottesons books?
Bolt thrust is easy to calculate:


It's likely as others have stated, that the mini receiver was not designed to handle the bolt thrust of "standard" diameter caseheads.

Other receivers, like the ubiquitous M700, use the same receiver design insofar as bolt lugs and abutments whether it's a non-magnum, or magnum- which is why opening the boltface or changing bolts is commonly done. Different story when it comes to Lapua boltface cartridges, where the increased bolt thrust is not considered in the design engineering. Some will do this conversion on standard magnum receivers (not moi), and while it's not likely to result in a catastrophic failure off the bat, the potential for plastic deformation of the lugs and abutments (setback) resulting in increasing headspace is expected.
Thanks.
Interesting. The larger the case head diameter, the more force (thrust). Opposite of something like surface area of tires on the roadway or the size of the pad under a crane outrigger. Learn something every day!
 
Bolt thrust is the reason we "roughen up" the inside of the chamber with sandpaper or Scotchbrite pad as the final step in the chambering process. This allows the case to grip the chamber walls upon detonation- a slick, shiny chamber results in increased bolt thrust.
 
Where does one find these hoop strength and bolt thrust calculations? Ottesons books?

Thanks.
Interesting. The larger the case head diameter, the more force (thrust). Opposite of something like surface area of tires on the roadway or the size of the pad under a crane outrigger. Learn something every day!

Best explanation here. Scroll down to the thrust section.
 
Bolt thrust is the reason we "roughen up" the inside of the chamber with sandpaper or Scotchbrite pad as the final step in the chambering process. This allows the case to grip the chamber walls upon detonation- a slick, shiny chamber results in increased bolt thrust.
I have to respectfully disagree with that. Think about case head separation. It can't be both ways.
I have never bought into the idea that a roughened up chamber lessons bolt thrust. Possibly reducing the brass flow into the shoulder area maybe.
 
I have to respectfully disagree with that. Think about case head separation. It can't be both ways.
Not following, Dave...
If there was zero adhesion of the brass to the chamber wall, wouldn't the entire case slide back to the boltface at ignition- preventing casehead separation (blowing out the shoulder instead)?

IOW, isn't it the case sticking to the chamber that causes the case head to separate in a rifle with excessive headspace?

From the WIki bolt thrust page...

Friction effects​

A complicating matter regarding bolt thrust is that a cartridge case expands and deforms under high pressure and starts to "stick" to the chamber. This "friction-effect" can be accounted for with finite elements calculations on a computer, but it is a lot of specialized work and generally not worth the trouble.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolt_thrust#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>

By oiling proof rounds during NATO EPVAT testing procedures, NATO test centers intentionally lower case friction to promote high bolt thrust levels.



Please explain what I'm not understanding here?
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
 
I'm not saying that there is no adhesion of the case in the chamber but it has little influence on bolt thrust. The case is driven forward by the firing pin. Pressure builds, when the pressure exceeds the yield point of the brass the case expands in every direction. using the case head separation line, as an indicator, shows that part of the case, about .400" + up the case moves to the rear to fill the chamber. That happens each and every time the case is fired regardless of the chamber finish, regardless of shoulder bump. If it didn't why would we need to bump the shoulder when sizing? Varying degrees of hard bolt lift is an example of bolt thrust.

" IOW, isn't it the case sticking to the chamber that causes the case head to separate in a rifle with excessive headspace?"

That would be partial case adhesion with pressure pushing the rear part case against the bolt face. Thus bolt thrust. Can we manipulate the bolt thrust numbers one way or the other in a small way. Maybe
 
On top of that, the amount of deflection in a strong, front locking action, is pretty insignificant; under .001". It doesn't take much pressure to move the case head .001". I made a fixture which was essentially a chamber section, split at 60 degrees. I can the clamp a case in it by putting it in the three-jaw chuck. It has about 1/2 inch of protrusion on the case. I can put a rod through the headstock and push on the inside of the case. With a dial indicator, I can tell how much I have to push to deflect that case head by .001 or more. I don't think it is much over 200-300 pounds. It varies according to where the case is gripped.
Now, in an action which is not so rigid, like a Lee Enfield, the bolt will deflect about .004 or .005 when fired with heavy loads. If the case adheres to the chamber wall, case head separation will occur in 4 or 5 firings. If the case does not adhere, the shoulder will move forward that much until the action will no longer stretch enough to accommodate the case. I have tested this. I even made up a fixture, using a lead ball, to measure the amount of deflection of the bolt head. It was a bit of a failure because I couldn't separate bolt deflection from receiver stretch. I might try again later. First things first though. First, I have to achieve a respectable result at the Tack Driver! WH
 
And …. Don’t forget that today modern commercial cases can be steel , coated steel or brass or coated brass ( which was around commercially for a while . Each has different reactions to expansion and adhering to the chamber walls . Then we can get into a situation where we are marginal on thrust pressures under normal conditions but when things change , like wet cartridges, it could become a bit too much bolt thrust and ruin a good day hunting with stuck case , broken extractor or a locked action .
 
Where does one find these hoop strength…calculations
Engineers Toolbox has a pressure vessel calculator. It’s typically used for things like tubes in a boiler.

It’s not intuitive and not simply plug and play without some research and understanding about what is going on.

Mby if I get the time I’ll run the numbers of a PPC and BR case.
 
Last edited:
I have to respectfully disagree with that. Think about case head separation. It can't be both ways.
I have never bought into the idea that a roughened up chamber lessons bolt thrust. Possibly reducing the brass flow into the shoulder area maybe.

I'm going to agree. I'm sure there's pressure on the wall of the chamber, but dressing the chamber with some sandpaper isn't doing anything. If it did... Wouldn't the brass come out with a rough finish?


Some "data" - Here's a crazy youtube who shot 223,308,and 50BMG with the bolt lugs removed.
 
Bolt thrust is the reason we "roughen up" the inside of the chamber with sandpaper or Scotchbrite pad as the final step in the chambering process. This allows the case to grip the chamber walls upon detonation- a slick, shiny chamber results in increased bolt thrust.
I started doing this a few years ago to newly chambered barrels
It's a good move, plus I think it looks nicer.
A quick cross hatching of scotch brite similar to a cylinder takes about 30 seconds to 1 minute
it could be a "feel good" move that seems good more in theory if we consider one thing
A brass case still sticks pretty darn good into a highly polished FL sizing die ...
........................sometimes even when lubed
so the jury is still out on chamber finish
(Meaning if the load has enough pressure to expand the case and the pressure ring seals there should not be that much difference in bolt thrust if the case is expanding to the chamber walls.)
---
I used to read about how guys would POLISH the inside of their chambers for what seemed to be more perceived smoother extraction (BR Guys)
but at the expense of more bolt thrust, but also read it isn't a whole lot more thrust
---
I read an article where one guy did some testing on lubed chamber vs dry to measure for bolt thrust such as in wet conditions if it rained or your chamber got wet from cleaning solutions.
the extra thrust from a wet chamber wasn't even that much more (approx 1000 psi more)
Here is a quick article I found measuring the pressure trace of a 30-30 standard vs an Ackley Chamber
but notice in the OILED Ackley chamber the pressure developed is still even lower than the standard


1764810578290.png



1764810551522.png

 
Last edited:
I didn't finish the video. TOO much noise.
I've seen first hand a Remington bolt imbedded in a friends shoulder.
The setup.
Multiple hang fires during a match.
In a hurry to chamber the next round.
Bolt was about 90% open when the round went off.
The bolt lugs hit the action lug cam surfaces snapping the bolt open.
Bolt rotates to the max.
Bolt handle snaps off leaving the imprint of the checkering on the bolt knob on the side of the scope.
Bolt leaves the action clipping several fingers on his hand which was on the stock cheek piece.
Bolt entered his shoulder, minus the bolt handle, and went through the joint with the lugs exposed on the entrance side.
Chamber finish doesn't mean shit. Just saying
 
I didn't finish the video. TOO much noise.
I've seen first hand a Remington bolt imbedded in a friends shoulder.
The setup.
Multiple hang fires during a match.
In a hurry to chamber the next round.
Bolt was about 90% open when the round went off.
The bolt lugs hit the action lug cam surfaces snapping the bolt open.
Bolt rotates to the max.
Bolt handle snaps off leaving the imprint of the checkering on the bolt knob on the side of the scope.
Bolt leaves the action clipping several fingers on his hand which was on the stock cheek piece.
Bolt entered his shoulder, minus the bolt handle, and went through the joint with the lugs exposed on the entrance side.
Chamber finish doesn't mean shit. Just saying
I agree here
But also, I read PO Ackley fired certain cases with no bolt lugs at all
 
An old timer gunsmith friend of mine (learned his trade as an armorer in the Korean War) once told me that it's a pipe bomb beside your face every time you proof test a new barrel/chambering.
I would defer to Dave Tooley on this one...
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,905
Messages
2,243,011
Members
80,872
Latest member
eclayson
Back
Top